홀로코스트 기억과 포스트식민주의 – 글로벌 시대의 독일 기억 문화
Holocaust Memory and Postcolonialism - Germany's memory culture in a Global Age
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
At the center of Germany's memory culture is the Holocaust, the genocide of European Jewry. Germany's undeniable responsibility for the Holocaust, defined as a historically unique destruction of civilization, is part of its identity. But by the 2020s, the ‘uniqueness’ of the Holocaust, which had been crystallized into a proposition, was again being questioned. In 2021, Germany was abuzz with the debate over the ‘uniqueness’ of the Holocaust, which led to a debate about the direction of Germany's memory culture that gripped the country and was soon labeled the ‘Historians' Debate 2.0’. The ‘Historians' Debate 2.0’ involved intellectuals from many countries, not just Germany, as the debate involved not only the assessment of the Holocaust and criticism of memory culture, but also very complex issues such as the legacy of the colonial past, racism, and Germany's political stance towards Israel. There is a growing consensus that it is important to expand the culture of remembrance to include colonial history, which until recently has been repressed in Germany's collective memory, and that Germany's political culture needs to change, especially in light of the immigration of recent decades. This is because immigrants who bring their own culture, experiences, and memories inevitably change and expand the political culture of the host country.
Abstract
At the center of Germany's memory culture is the Holocaust, the genocide of European Jewry. Germany's undeniable responsibility for the Holocaust, defined as a historically unique destruction of civilization, is part of its identity. But by the 2020s, the ‘uniqueness’ of the Holocaust, which had been crystallized into a proposition, was again being questioned. In 2021, Germany was abuzz with the debate over the ‘uniqueness’ of the Holocaust, which led to a debate about the direction of Germany's memory culture that gripped the country and was soon labeled the ‘Historians' Debate 2.0’. The ‘Historians' Debate 2.0’ involved intellectuals from many countries, not just Germany, as the debate involved not only the assessment of the Holocaust and criticism of memory culture, but also very complex issues such as the legacy of the colonial past, racism, and Germany's political stance towards Israel. There is a growing consensus that it is important to expand the culture of remembrance to include colonial history, which until recently has been repressed in Germany's collective memory, and that Germany's political culture needs to change, especially in light of the immigration of recent decades. This is because immigrants who bring their own culture, experiences, and memories inevitably change and expand the political culture of the host country.
참고문헌 (37)
- Böckmann, Matthias, "Jenseits von Mbembe. Geschichte, Erinnerung, Solidarität" (2022)
- Brumlik, Micha, "Postkolonialer Antisemitismus? Achille Mbembe, die palästinensische BDS-Bewegung und andere Aufreger" (2021)
- "Besonders das postkoloniale, ‚woke‘ Milieu macht Stimmung" (2023)[URL]
- Detjen, Stephan, "Antisemitismusbeauftragter als diskursiver Schrankenwärter", Deutschlandradio, ~ (2020)
- Diner, Dan, "Ein Verbrechen ohne Namen", pp.71~86 (2022)
- "Die postkoloniale Schablone" (2020)[URL]
- Postkolonialismus und Antisemitismus. In: Centrum für Antisemitismus- und Rassismusstudien(CARS) an der Katholischen Hochschule Nordrhein-Westfalen, "Elbe, Ingo", ~, pp.Working Paper 6 (2022)
- Ernst, Andreas, "Die Globalisierung verändert die Vergangenheit – das zeigt die Debatte um Holocaust und Kolonialismus", Neue Zürcher Zeitung, ~ (2021)
- Frei, Norbert, "Ein Verbrechen ohne Namen", pp.35~51 (2022)
- Friedländer, Saul, "Ein Verbrechen ohne Namen", pp.17~31 (2022)
- Funke, Hajo, "Erinnerungskämpfe", pp.310~327 (2023)
- "Leerstelle Antisemitismus" (2020)[URL]
- "Der neue Historikerstreit" (2021)[URL]
- "Das kann wie Zensur wirken" (2021)[URL]
- Jureit, Ulrike, "Gefühlte Opfer. Illusionen der Vergangenheitsbewältigung" (2010)
- "Der Holocaust ist ein globales Ereignis geworden(Interview mit Aleida Assmann)" (2020)[URL]
- Köhler, Henning, "Deutschland auf dem Weg zu sich selbst. Eine Jahrhundertgeschichte" (2002)
- "Ihr seid gegen jede Diskriminierung, außer sie betrifft Juden und Israelis?" (2022)[URL]
- Malinowski, Stephan, "Die Logik der Täter", Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, ~ (2023)
- "Diffuse Erinnerung" (2021)[URL]
- "Die Welt reparieren" (2020)[URL]
- "Rede von Bundeskanzlerin Dr. Angela Merkel vor der Knesset am 18. März 2008 in Jerusalem" (2008)[URL]
- "Deutschstunde für alle Welt" (2020)[URL]
- "Der Katechismus der Deutschen" (2021)[URL]
- Moses, Dirk, "Historiker streiten. Gewalt und Holocaust – Die Dabatte", pp.199~242 (2022)
- Moses, Dirk, "Erinnerungskämpfe", pp.264~290 (2023)
- Niven, Bill, "Aufarbeitung des Nationalsozialismus. Ein Kompendium" (2021)
- Olick, Jeffrey K., "The Sins of the Fathers: Germany, Memory, Method" (2016)
- "Streit um Achille Mbembe" (2020)[URL]
- Reinecke, Stefan, "Meinungsfreiheit zuerst. Laut Wissenschaftlichem Dienst ist der BDS-Beschluss des Bundestags nicht verbindlich. Als Gesetz wäre er verfassungswidrig", taz, ~ (2020)
- "Immerwährende Verantwortung für die Sicherheit des Staates Israel" (2022)[URL]
- "Rede zur Eröffnung der Ausstellungen des Ethnologischen Museums und des Museums für Asiatische Kunst der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin im Humboldt-Forum" (2021)[URL]
- Wildt, Michael, "Historiker streiten", pp.309~328 (2022)
- "Enttabuisiert den Vergleich! Die Geschichtsschreibung globalisieren, das Gedenken pluralisieren: Warum sich die deutsche Erinnerungslandschaft verandern muss" (2021)[URL]
- "Von Afrika nach Russland" (2021)[URL]
- Zimmerer, Jürgen, "Erinnerungskämpfe. Neues deutsches Geschichtsbewusstsein", pp.55~79 (2023)