번역을 통해 나타나는 한중 수사 논리의 차이 - 한중일 공동교과서 ‘미래를 여는 역사’의 번역 변이 분석
A research on the difference between Korean-Chinese and Chinese-Korean translation in ways rhetoric logic is reflected
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Due to various factors of the translation process, changes between the source text and target text inevitably occur. Nature of the shift is differs from language to language, however, contemporary research concentrates on Western languages and Oriental languages such as Korean and Chinese are less studied. Previous papers have provided a comparison of sentences excepted from English, Chinese, and Korean versions of the Encyclopedia Britannica. This paper tries to broaden the analytical category and the scope of research to beyond sentence units. Korean and Chinese history textbooks, which NGO’s from Korea, China, and Japan co-wrote and published in 2005 are examined and compared. This paper identifies four categories of differences between Korean and Chinese in advancing a logic or thought: order of sentence element arrangement (result/purpose), way of advancing logic (deductive/inductive), passive/active voice, and an ideology.
Abstract
Due to various factors of the translation process, changes between the source text and target text inevitably occur. Nature of the shift is differs from language to language, however, contemporary research concentrates on Western languages and Oriental languages such as Korean and Chinese are less studied. Previous papers have provided a comparison of sentences excepted from English, Chinese, and Korean versions of the Encyclopedia Britannica. This paper tries to broaden the analytical category and the scope of research to beyond sentence units. Korean and Chinese history textbooks, which NGO’s from Korea, China, and Japan co-wrote and published in 2005 are examined and compared. This paper identifies four categories of differences between Korean and Chinese in advancing a logic or thought: order of sentence element arrangement (result/purpose), way of advancing logic (deductive/inductive), passive/active voice, and an ideology.
참고문헌 (13)
- 도희진, "브리태니커 백과사전의 한국어 및 중국어 번역본의 비교를 통해 본 수사적 논리 전개 방식의 차이", 통역번역연구소 논문집, 9, pp.83~96 (2005)
- 유영난, "번역이란 무엇인가-박완서의 ‘엄마의 말뚝’ 영역을 중심으로" (1991), 태학사
- 이근희, "이근희의 번역산책" (2005), 한국문화사
- 한중일3국공동역사편찬위원회, "미래를 여는 역사", 한겨레신문사, ~ (2005)
- O.Reboul, "언어와 이데올로기" (1994), 역사비평사
- N.F.Chang, "번역학비판" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- J. Munday, "번역학입문" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- <??三?的??代史>共同??委??, "??三?的??代史" (2005), 社?科?文?出版社
- Baker,M., "Routledge encyclopedia of Translation Studies" (1998), Rourledge:London
- Hartman,K., "Ideology, identification and the construction of the feminine: Le journal de marie bashkirtseff", The Translator, 5(1), pp.61~82 (1999)
- Kaplan,R,B., "Cultural Thought Patterns in Inter-cultural Education" (1965), University of Southern California
- Reiss,C., "Translation Criticism - The Potentials & Limitations" (2000), St.Jerome Publishing
- Van dijk,T.A., "Discourse Analysis ad Ideology Analysis. Language and Peace", pp.17~33 (1995), Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing