한국학과 서양 인문학의 소통 문제
On the mutual understanding between Korean studies and the western humanities
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There is a high barrier between the West and Korea in thoughts and art. The Westerners look the world from a substantial paradigm, but Koreans, from a mutual relational paradigm. The Western people think with binarism(A or not-A), but Koreans with fuzzy logic(A and not-A). Orientalism, ultra-nationalism, and toadyism obstruct mutual communication between two. Despite the differences, there is the way through which the two can understand and communicate mutually. Firstly, Korean scholars must know exactly the peculiar characteristic of Korean thought and art. After understanding this thoroughly, he or she may as well mention about Korean art and thought. Secondly, Koreans as well as the Westerns must cognize the differences between substantialism and mutual relational paradigm. Then, he or she should bridge between two. Thirdly, as proposed by subaltern theory or dependence theory, Korean scholars must develop original theories which are based on Korea's unique conditions and thoughts. Fourthly, as Thích Nhất Hạnh did, Korean scholars must explain Korean thoughts and art with the discourse about Western values and paradigm. Lastly, the Westerners and Koreans take part in traditional art performance of each other, and then look other's art and culture in other's view.
Abstract
There is a high barrier between the West and Korea in thoughts and art. The Westerners look the world from a substantial paradigm, but Koreans, from a mutual relational paradigm. The Western people think with binarism(A or not-A), but Koreans with fuzzy logic(A and not-A). Orientalism, ultra-nationalism, and toadyism obstruct mutual communication between two. Despite the differences, there is the way through which the two can understand and communicate mutually. Firstly, Korean scholars must know exactly the peculiar characteristic of Korean thought and art. After understanding this thoroughly, he or she may as well mention about Korean art and thought. Secondly, Koreans as well as the Westerns must cognize the differences between substantialism and mutual relational paradigm. Then, he or she should bridge between two. Thirdly, as proposed by subaltern theory or dependence theory, Korean scholars must develop original theories which are based on Korea's unique conditions and thoughts. Fourthly, as Thích Nhất Hạnh did, Korean scholars must explain Korean thoughts and art with the discourse about Western values and paradigm. Lastly, the Westerners and Koreans take part in traditional art performance of each other, and then look other's art and culture in other's view.
참고문헌 (23)
- Bonnefoy, Y., "Mythologies(vol.Ⅰ, Ⅱ)" (1991), University of Chicago Press
- Covell, Jon Carter, "Korean impact on Japanese culture: Japan's hidden history" (1984), Hollym International
- Lee, Doheum, "A Possibility of Hwajaeng Semiotic as Intertextuality Theory", International Conference: Translation and Modernity in Korea (2004), Center for Korean Studies
- Lee, Doheum, "A Comparative Study on the Hwajaeng Buddhism and Postmodern Philosophy", Conference on Process and Han (2007), Claremont University, The Center for Process
- Saussure, Ferdinand de, "Course in General Linguistics" (1959), Philosophical Library
- Whitehead, "A.N.. Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology" (1991), The Free Press
- 權寧弼, "韓國傳統美術의 美學的課題, In 韓國美學試論", pp.70~97 (1994)
- 김헌선, "한국의 창세신화: 巫歌로 보는 우리의 신화" (1994), 길벗
- 까르마 츠앙, "화엄철학" (1990), 경서원
- 리차드 니스벳, "생각의 지도" (2004), 김영사
- 바트 코스코, "퍼지식 사고" (1995), 김영사
- 심광현, "한국의 미와 예술", 대중매체와 국어교육, 81 (2003)
- 元曉, "金剛三昧經論, In 韓國佛敎全書. 第1冊" (1979), 東國大學校出版部
- 유동식, "韓國巫敎의 歷史와 構造" (1975), 연세대학교 출판부
- 유동식, "풍류도와 예술신학" (2006), 한들
- 이도흠, "화쟁기호학, 이론과 실제-화쟁사상을 통한 형식주의와 마르크시즘의 종합" (1999), 한양대출판부
- 이도흠, "온 생명을 아우르는 화쟁적 합리성에 대하여, In 생명에 관한 아홉 가지 에세이" (2002), 민음사
- 이도흠, "한국예술의 심층구조로서 情과 恨의 아우름", 미학예술학연구, 17, pp.43~74 (2003), 한국미학예술학회
- 이도흠, "소쉬르, 하이데거, 원효의 언어관 비교 연구", 기호학 연구, 21(1), pp.217~253 (2007), 한국기호학회
- 이도흠, "근대성 논의에서 패러다임과 방법론의 혁신 문제 -식민지근대화론과 내재적 근대화론을 넘어 差異와 異種의 근대성으로", 국어국문학, (153), pp.253~286 (2009), 국어국문학회
- 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (1999), 푸른숲
- 전성운, "한국학의 개념과 세계화의 방안", 한국학연구, 32, pp.317~337 (2010), 한국학연구소
- 김보국, "해외한국학백서" (2007), 을유문화사