한국 번역사의 시대 구분
A Tentative Demarcation of Korean Translation History
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims at demarcating the Korean translation chronicle, after having established some resonable demarcation criteria from the dawn of translation era to the early part of the 20th century. The results discussed so far are as follows: The key point on which the author persistently has emphasized in finding out the proper, and relatively objective, criteria to demarcate the Korean translation history, is that they should be based upon the intra-history, not extra-history, of translation; that is, they should be extracted from the thorough survey for concrete translation materials themselves, which in turn form the body of translation history. Taking this basic principle into consideration, the author has tried to find out some factors which led the changes revealed in the Korean translation history by examining both outer and inner aspects of translated books. The former aspects taken into account in this paper are their source and target languages, their translation techniques applied to the translation, their translation formats, and the latter ones are the kinds of fields such as Buddhist/ Confucian scriptures, armory books, medical books, etc. The strongest factor that we have found out from our survey and analysis of the necessary translated materials, is the kinds of languages relevant languages, especially target language. The tentative demarcation of Korean translation history is as follows: I. The Pseudo Translation Period (From 11th to 13th century) II. The Pure Translation Period (From the 14th century and after) II.a. The Translation-by-Idu Stage (To the middle of 15th century) II.b.The Translation-by-Korean Alphabet Stage (From the middle of 15th century and after) II.b.1. The Translation-by-Jeongeum Phase (To the latter of 19th century) II.b.2. The Translation-by-Hangeul Phase (From the latter of 19th century and after)
Abstract
This paper aims at demarcating the Korean translation chronicle, after having established some resonable demarcation criteria from the dawn of translation era to the early part of the 20th century. The results discussed so far are as follows: The key point on which the author persistently has emphasized in finding out the proper, and relatively objective, criteria to demarcate the Korean translation history, is that they should be based upon the intra-history, not extra-history, of translation; that is, they should be extracted from the thorough survey for concrete translation materials themselves, which in turn form the body of translation history. Taking this basic principle into consideration, the author has tried to find out some factors which led the changes revealed in the Korean translation history by examining both outer and inner aspects of translated books. The former aspects taken into account in this paper are their source and target languages, their translation techniques applied to the translation, their translation formats, and the latter ones are the kinds of fields such as Buddhist/ Confucian scriptures, armory books, medical books, etc. The strongest factor that we have found out from our survey and analysis of the necessary translated materials, is the kinds of languages relevant languages, especially target language. The tentative demarcation of Korean translation history is as follows: I. The Pseudo Translation Period (From 11th to 13th century) II. The Pure Translation Period (From the 14th century and after) II.a. The Translation-by-Idu Stage (To the middle of 15th century) II.b.The Translation-by-Korean Alphabet Stage (From the middle of 15th century and after) II.b.1. The Translation-by-Jeongeum Phase (To the latter of 19th century) II.b.2. The Translation-by-Hangeul Phase (From the latter of 19th century and after)
참고문헌 (37)
- 김병철, "한국 근대 번역문학사 연구" (1975), 을유문화사
- 김병철, "한국 현대 번역문학사 연구 (상, 하)" (1998), 을유문화사
- 김완진, "세종대의 어문 정책에 대한 논의 -훈민정음을 圍繞한 數三의 과제", 성곡논총, 3, pp.185~215 (1972), 성곡학술문화재단
- 김정우, "15세기 불경 언해의 문체와 어휘-능엄경언해의 경우?, 『팔리대장경 우리말옮김』, 115-148, 경전읽기모임", ~ (1990)
- 김정우, "북한의 번역 연구와 고전 번역 사업", 교육이론과 실천, 12(3), pp.307~317 (2003), 경남대학교 교육문제연구소
- 김정우, "한국 번역사 논의의 전제", 우리말연구, 16, pp.139~161 (2005), 우리말학회
- 김지원, "한국의 번역 전통(Korean Tradition in Translation), 이화여대 국제학술대회 “통역번역에서 문화 요소의 차이: 아시아를 중심으로” 발표문(2007. 06.14)", ~ (2007)
- 남풍현, "고대 국어 자료 -국어학의 상대 자료-" (1998), 국립국어연구원
- 남풍현, "국어사를 위한 구결 연구" (1999), 태학사
- 박소동, "퇴계 四書釋義의 경학적 특성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1995
- 백두현, "국어사 연구의 새로운 방향 설정을 위하여", 국어학, 47, pp.3~38 (2006), 국어학회
- 백두현, "석독구결의 문자 체계와 기능" (2005), 한국문화사
- 송 민, "국어에 대한 일본어의 간섭", 국어생활, 14, pp.25~34 (1988), 국어연구소
- 안병희, "中世國語 硏究 資料의 性格에 대한 硏究 -飜譯樣式을 중심으로 하여-", 어학연구, 9(1), pp.75~86 (1973), 서울대 어학연구소
- 안병희, "口訣과 漢文 訓讀에 대하여", 진단학보, (41), pp.143~165 (1976), 진단학회
- 여찬영, "조선조 언해서의 번역비평적 연구", 배달말, 33, pp.239~262 (2003), 배달말학회
- 여찬영, "언해서 ‘여훈언해’의 번역학적 연구", 어문학, 86, pp.61~84 (2004), 어문학회
- 유명우, "한국 번역사 정리를 위한 시론(試論)", 번역학연구, 3(1), pp.9~38 (2002), 한국번역학회
- 유명우, "한국 번역사에서 본 조선조 언해(諺解) 번역", 번역학연구, 5(2), pp.69~91 (2004), 한국번역학회
- 윤용선, "15세기 언해 자료와 구결문" (2003), 역락
- 이광호, "국어사의 시대 구분, 그 실상과 문제점", pp.11~35 (2001), 태학사
- 이기문, "新訂版 국어사 개설" (1998), 태학사
- 이현희, "중세 국어 자료" (1996), 국립국어연구원
- 이희재, "번역사 산책" (2001), 궁리
- 전현주, "다중체계 이론과 한국 현대번역문학사", 번역학연구, 5(1), pp.167~181 (2004), 한국번역학회
- 정? 광, "일본어투 문장 표현", 새국어생활, 5(2), pp.87~107 (1995)
- 정혜옥, "번역과 제국: 포스트 식민주의 이론 해설" (2002), 동문선
- 조규태, "배달말이란 무엇인가, 배달말, 진단과 전망 (학술대회 초록집) 1-19, 배달말학회", ~ (2007)
- 조항범, "다시 쓴 우리말 어원 이야기" (1997), 한국문원
- 최현배, "(고친) 한글갈" (1982), 정음문화사
- 홍윤표, "근대 국어 자료" (1997), 국립국어연구원
- Baker M., "Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies" (1998), Routledge
- Basnett-McGuire, "Translation Studies, Methuen" (1980), Routledge
- Jacobson, R, "On Linguistic Aspects of Translation" (1959), Harvard U P
- Nida, E. A., "The Theory and Practice of Translation, Leiden, Brill", ~ (1969)
- Pym,Anthony, "Method in Translation History" (1998), St. Jerome, UK
- Song, Yo-In, "Translation: Theory and Practice" (1975), Dongguk U P