朝鮮後期文人들의 錢謙益批評

Abstract

This paper is under order to uncover what the literary men in the late Joseon(朝鮮) regarded Qiánqiānyì(錢謙益) in Míng(明)․Qīng(淸) as and what they mainly discussed synthetically. Upon investigation, they gradually tried to collect more information related to him and his works through diverse routes as well as gradually broadened the scope of the concern to his whole works and peruse them since they were interested in him because of the influx of Lièzhāoshījí(列朝詩集) in the middle and late 17th century. And then, in the series of process, some introduced his literature positively in some's own way or other criticized his based on collected information of him. Considering the references that the literary men in the late Joseon(朝鮮)mentioned to Qiánqiānyì(錢謙益) on the criterion of the object to criticism,they can be divided into two: character grading and literary works ppreciating. The former that dealt with Qiánqiānyì(錢謙益)'s whole life is generally negative estimation of losing fidelity to his principle, humbling the Joseon's literary men, and discussing unfairly. On the other hand, the latter is to appreciate his literature. In the beginning of accepting his works, it seemed both positive and negative. But in the late 18th century, it gradually was occupied with criticism as the new theory of literature and negative recognition of him intervened in evaluating his works.