유만주(兪晩柱)의 전겸익(錢謙益) 수용 - 조선후기 지식인이 명청 교체기 문학을 읽는다는 것 -
Yu Manju兪晩柱’s Way of Reading Qian Qianyi錢謙益
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Yu Manju兪晩柱, when he was 23 years old, had read through most of writings ofQian Qianyi錢謙益 in a mere two months. He held Qian’s works in esteem andsympathized with him. But since Qian’s name was branded with infamy for hisdisloyalty to the Ming dynasty and his works were censored by the Qing court, Joseon朝鮮 intellectuals generally despised him for his equivocal behavior and double identity. And Qian’s some disparaging remarks about Chinese writing style of Joseon in “Anafterword to Huánghuájí跋皇華集” caused some kind of nationalism and publicindignation among Joseon intellectuals. So Qian’s works had been understudied andmisinterpreted in Joseon. Instead of being obsessed with some unfriendly comment of aforeign writer, Yu Manju focused on Qian’s voluminous work itself and explored thecomplexities of life and mind of him. As a result, he could understand accurately Qian,the eminent writer of the Ming-Qing明淸 dynastic transition, reputing him as both aliterary critic and historiographer. Yu’s way of capacitive reading Qian as a foreignwriter of modern times is still valid and meaningful.
Abstract
Yu Manju兪晩柱, when he was 23 years old, had read through most of writings ofQian Qianyi錢謙益 in a mere two months. He held Qian’s works in esteem andsympathized with him. But since Qian’s name was branded with infamy for hisdisloyalty to the Ming dynasty and his works were censored by the Qing court, Joseon朝鮮 intellectuals generally despised him for his equivocal behavior and double identity. And Qian’s some disparaging remarks about Chinese writing style of Joseon in “Anafterword to Huánghuájí跋皇華集” caused some kind of nationalism and publicindignation among Joseon intellectuals. So Qian’s works had been understudied andmisinterpreted in Joseon. Instead of being obsessed with some unfriendly comment of aforeign writer, Yu Manju focused on Qian’s voluminous work itself and explored thecomplexities of life and mind of him. As a result, he could understand accurately Qian,the eminent writer of the Ming-Qing明淸 dynastic transition, reputing him as both aliterary critic and historiographer. Yu’s way of capacitive reading Qian as a foreignwriter of modern times is still valid and meaningful.
참고문헌 (15)
- 郭紹虞, "中國文學批評史" (1961), 中華書局
- 김윤조, "조선후기 한문학에 있어서 전겸익", 대동한문학, 13 (2000)
- 윤지훈, "朝鮮後期文人들의 錢謙益批評", 대동문화연구, 69(69), pp.35~64 (2010), 대동문화연구원
- 남공철, "與吳士執 允常"
- 유만주, "欽英丁酉叙", ~
- 朴璟蘭, "明末淸初 시대와 錢謙益의 文學主張", 중국어문학논집, 20, pp.451~480 (2002), 중국어문학연구회
- 錢謙益, "有學集 卷29"
- 南公轍, "金陵集 卷14"
- 朴趾源, "熱河日記"
- 심경호, "燕巖의 錢謙益論", 한문교육연구, 2 (1988)
- 牛林杰, "17-18世纪中韩文人之间的跨文化交流与文化误读", 韩国研究论丛, 15 (2007), 世界知识出版社
- 華察, "慕齋集 卷8"
- 申昉, "屯菴集 卷8"
- 申緯, "警修堂全藁 冊7"
- 金邁淳, "臺山集 卷20"
