개화기 ‘學部 편찬 修身書’가 지니는 敎科用 圖書로서의 의의와 한계
The Meaning and Limitation as Textbook Included in the Time of Enlightenment ‘Moral Training Textbooks Compiled by Hakbu’
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The subject of this study is about moral training textbooks compiled by Hakbu(學部) from 1894 to 1910. During the period were compiled three moral training textbooks: Suk Hye Gi Ryak(『夙惠記略』), So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』), and Elementary School Textbook of the Self-cultivation(『普通學校 學徒用 修身書』). Suk Hye Gi Ryak(『夙惠記略』) is a textbook to introduce Chinese people in the different age groups. The first feature of it is that it does not cover the people with the equal weight. Secondly, the figures written in the textbook have a variety of nationality and organizations they belong to. Thirdly, the people introduced in the textbook are so called a ‘genius’. So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』) focused on introducing the people of Goryeo(高麗) and Joseon(朝鮮) by subjects. It has very systematic and precise features. But, it has a tendency towards Confucianism-centered contents. Elementary School Textbook of the Self-cultivation(『普通學校 學徒用 修身書』), unlike other moral training textbooks, was compiled after the establishment of the Residency-General(統監府) in 1906. It hardly contains the contents related to loyalty and patriotism, and features negative description about Daehan Empire(大韓帝國). However, the textbook has considerably advanced for the practical use of teaching and learning. Based on the features described earlier, the comparative analysis of the three moral training textbooks came to the conclusion as follows. So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』) is more stable and better than two other moral training textbooks in various aspects. Although So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』) has an excellent systematic composition and stability regarding practical use and suitability of purpose better than two other textbooks, it has the limitations of Confucianism-centered contents and lack of futuristic value. In fact, Elementary School Textbook of the Self-cultivation(『普通學校 學徒用 修身書』) has considerably advanced regarding the suitability of purpose and practical use, but there is some suspicion that Japan had been involved in removing the contents related to loyalty and patriotism, which were the purpose of moral training subject from 1906 to 1910. Moreover, since the textbook contains disparagement and negative ideas of Daehan Empire, this study concludes that it is problematic textbook. Its composition is very effective only in achieving the purpose of the restricted moral training subject. In the case of Suk Hye Gi Ryak(『夙惠記略』), it has the lowest level of assessment in various aspects so that it leaves something to be unsatisfied.
Abstract
The subject of this study is about moral training textbooks compiled by Hakbu(學部) from 1894 to 1910. During the period were compiled three moral training textbooks: Suk Hye Gi Ryak(『夙惠記略』), So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』), and Elementary School Textbook of the Self-cultivation(『普通學校 學徒用 修身書』). Suk Hye Gi Ryak(『夙惠記略』) is a textbook to introduce Chinese people in the different age groups. The first feature of it is that it does not cover the people with the equal weight. Secondly, the figures written in the textbook have a variety of nationality and organizations they belong to. Thirdly, the people introduced in the textbook are so called a ‘genius’. So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』) focused on introducing the people of Goryeo(高麗) and Joseon(朝鮮) by subjects. It has very systematic and precise features. But, it has a tendency towards Confucianism-centered contents. Elementary School Textbook of the Self-cultivation(『普通學校 學徒用 修身書』), unlike other moral training textbooks, was compiled after the establishment of the Residency-General(統監府) in 1906. It hardly contains the contents related to loyalty and patriotism, and features negative description about Daehan Empire(大韓帝國). However, the textbook has considerably advanced for the practical use of teaching and learning. Based on the features described earlier, the comparative analysis of the three moral training textbooks came to the conclusion as follows. So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』) is more stable and better than two other moral training textbooks in various aspects. Although So Hak Dok Bon(『小學讀本』) has an excellent systematic composition and stability regarding practical use and suitability of purpose better than two other textbooks, it has the limitations of Confucianism-centered contents and lack of futuristic value. In fact, Elementary School Textbook of the Self-cultivation(『普通學校 學徒用 修身書』) has considerably advanced regarding the suitability of purpose and practical use, but there is some suspicion that Japan had been involved in removing the contents related to loyalty and patriotism, which were the purpose of moral training subject from 1906 to 1910. Moreover, since the textbook contains disparagement and negative ideas of Daehan Empire, this study concludes that it is problematic textbook. Its composition is very effective only in achieving the purpose of the restricted moral training subject. In the case of Suk Hye Gi Ryak(『夙惠記略』), it has the lowest level of assessment in various aspects so that it leaves something to be unsatisfied.
참고문헌 (34)
- 한국학문헌연구소, "한국 개화기 교과서 총서 9, 수신․윤리편 Ⅰ" (1977), 아세아 문화사
- 한국학문헌연구소, "한국 개화기 교과서 총서 1, 국어편 Ⅰ" (1977), 아세아 문화사
- "小學校令", 官報, (119) (1895)
- "漢城師範學校 規則", 官報, (121) (1895)
- "普通學校令", 官報, (3546) (1906)
- 교육과학기술부, "초등학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅲ) 국어, 도덕, 사회" (2008), 미래엔 컬처그룹
- 교육과학기술부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅱ)국어,도덕,사회" (2008), 미래엔 컬처그룹
- 교육과학기술부, "고등학교 교육과정 해설 3. 도덕" (2008), 미래엔 컬처그룹
- 김경자, "한국 근대 초등교육의 좌절―일제강점기 초등교육" (2005), 교육과학사
- 김순전, "제국의 식민지 수신―조선총독부 편찬 <修身書> 연구" (2009), 제이앤씨
- 이성은, "한국 근대 초등교육의 성립" (2005), 교육과학사
- 申海永, "근대 수신 교과서 3" (2011), 소명출판
- 안춘근, "한국고서평석" (1986), 동화출판공사
- 유봉호, "한국교육과정사 연구" (1992), 교학연구사
- 윤여탁, "국어교육 100년사 Ⅰ" (2006), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이종국, "한국의 교과서 출판 변천 연구" (2002), 일진사
- 이종국, "한국의 교과서 변천사" (2008), 대한교과서
- 제7차 교육과정에 의거한 초등학교 교과용 도서의 현장 타당도 분석․평가 연구, "한국교과서연구재단", ~ (2002)
- 교과용 도서 평가 연구(Ⅰ)―질 관리 체제 구축을 중심으로, "한국교육과정평가원", ~ (2007)
- 교과용 도서 평가 연구(Ⅱ)―평가모형 개발 및 평가 기준 설정, "한국교육과정평가원", ~ (2008)
- 함종규, "한국교육과정 변천사 연구" (2004), 교육과학사
- 稻葉繼雄, "구한말 교육과 일본인" (2006), 온누리
- 古川 昭, "구한말 근대학교의 형성" (2006), 경인문화사
- 김국현, "도덕 교과서의 총체적 질 관리 방안 연구", 윤리교육연구, (15), pp.193~220 (2008), 한국윤리교육학회
- 김국현, "도덕과 교과서 선정 평가기준 연구", 윤리교육연구, (18), pp.23~46 (2009), 한국윤리교육학회
- 김민재, "근대 수신 교과서를 통해 살펴본 ‘도덕과 교육’의 연속성 -『윤리학 교과서』와 『고등 소학수신서』를 중심으로", 한국문화연구, 19, pp.85~127 (2010), 한국문화연구원
- 김승주, "구한말 『수신서』와 『바른 생활』의 교과서에 관한 비교 연구", 석사, pp.1994
- 김항구, "근대 이후 한국 교과서의 변천", 한국교원대학교 박물관 연보, 1 (2001)
- 서재복, "한말 개화기 초등용 교과서 분석", 교육종합연구, 3(2) (2005)
- 石松慶子, "통감부 치하 대한제국의 수신 교과서․국어독본 분석", 석사, pp.2003
- 이성후, "『夙惠記略』 硏究", 금오공과대학교 논문집, 5 (1985)
- 이명준, "개화기 전후의 도덕과 교육과정에 대한 교육사적 고찰", 교육철학연구, (43), pp.65~87 (2008), 한국교육철학학회
- 이해명, "개화기 교육목표와 교과서 내용과의 차이점 연구", 단국대학교 논문집, 22 (1988)
- 홍호선, "대한제국말기 수신 교과서에 나타난 인물의 인용상황 분석", 한국교육사학, 19 (1997)
