본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한말 수원지역 역둔토 조사의 성격

The Characteristic of the Yeok-Dun-To survey in Suwon-gun in the late Great Han Empire

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Since the end of 18th century, Suwon-Bu(水原府) had developed as a political-military city where Jang-Yong-Oi-Yong, a military camp, was founded and Dun-To(屯土), the land of providing material support to Jang-Yong-Oi-Yong, was established. This paper analyzes the feature of the Chosun government’s survey on Yeok-Dun-To(驛屯土) in Suwon in the late of Great Han Empire. According to the Hwa-Sung-Ji(華城誌) written in 1831, Dun-To under the control of Suwon-Bu consisted of total 28 farmlands of Dun(屯) including 8 farmlands in Suwon-Bu, 5 farmlands in Yongin-Hyun, 6 farmlands in Kyunggi-Do, 3 farmlands in Chungcheong-Do, and 6 farmlands in Hwanghe-Do. The gross area of Dun-To reached 728.088 gyul(結) and 5,770.9 durak(斗落), only 18.5% of which was located in Suwon-Bu and the rest of which was located outside of the city. This implies that Suwon-Bu had been highly regarded as the new city based on city development policy of the Chosun government. The government purchased the farmlands of Deyou-Dun(大有屯) and Chukmanje-Dun(祝萬堤屯) and run these ones through the landowner system(地主制) in which the landowner, the government in this case, collects land rent from the peasants. The rest of farmlands, on the other hand, collected 100 du(斗) or 200 du of millet per gyul(結) from peasants in the form of land tax instead of land rent. Under this system, the overall scale of Dun-To had been largely maintained until the end of 19th century. In the action of Gab-O-Seung-Chong(甲午陞摠) which planned to abolish the tax-free farmland system and the survey on Yeok-Dun-To in 1894, Deyou-Dun and Chukmanje-Dun were excluded from targets of survey, which seems to prepare for the following investigation of land ownership. The overall amount of Dun-To under the control of Suwon-gun accounted for 7.3% of the gross area recorded in land ledger of Suwon-gun and 14.7% of taxed land, which allows us to see the scale of Dun-To in Suwon-Bu. In accordance with Ul-Mi-Sa-Pan(乙未査辦) of 1895 in which the Agriculture and Business Department of the Enlightenment Party Government investigated a demesne of the state in Suwon-gun, the results were as follows: 209.134 gyul of Yeok-To, 260.771 gyul of Dun-To, 42.701 gyul of Gung-Bang-Jyun(宮房田) and 166.46 gyul of Mok-Jang-To(牧場土). The basic unit of this survey was Durak which was an absolute unit for calculating area of land, and the land rent (or land tax) was charged every 100 duraks. Although this seems certainly a kind of preparations for the investigation of land ownership, it was still crucial to figure out and check the land rent (or land tax) of Yeok-Dun-To. The land rent was as low as 3 or 4 du of millet per durak since peasants paid fixed rent in advance regardless of how much they could produce in harvest season. The survey conducted by the Military Department, which took over the right of management of Yeok-To from the Agriculture and Business Department in 1897, identified that most of Dun-To was under control of Kung-Nae-Bu, the Department of Royal Household. This implies how Great Han Empire operated the government as well as how much of the demesne of the state belonged to Kung-Nae-Bu. While this survey showed that the characteristic of land rent (or land tax) differed from each other in various ways, the average rent, in the case of rice field, constituted 3 du of millet per one durak. Even though Kwang-Mu-Sa-Gum(光武査檢) since 1899, a kind of the self-survey of Nae-Chang-Won(內藏院) on its private land, basically followed the model of one conducted by the Military Department, the effort to take the control over Dun-To located in other areas was no more significant in that the farmlands in the center such as A-Mun-Dun-Jeon and Mok-Jang-To were entirely measured in the unit of Gun. In particular, by measuring all of farmlands as durak, this survey distinguished itself from the one of Gyul-Bu(結負) based on the feudal way of collecting tax. The payment in kind replaced the one in money, and the average rent of comparable rice field still fell on the extent of 3.4 Du of millet per durak. As Nae-Chang-Won pursued to raise the rent, peasants complained of the unfairness of its double taxation; however, it was common for them to compromise until reaching the rate of private land’s rent. Kyung-Ri-Won(經理院) whose function and scale were downgraded from those of Nae-Chang-Won in 1905 surveyed the Yeok-Dun-To in Suwon-gun, most of which was identified in this survey: the gross area including 3 farmlands of Yeok-To and 24 farmlands of Dun-To was 756 Ilkyung, 15,324.1 durak, 122.838 Kyul, etc.. The law issued in June 1908 announced that government nationalized this Yeok-Dun-To in Suwon and vested its control in Tak-Ji-Bu(度支部). Since then, the actual survey on Yoek-Dun-To conducted by the Residency-General of Japan identified that state had the exclusive right of possession over the farmlands. The rent of rice field per durak in this period came to 5.3 du of millet for the first time, which was significantly close to the rent of private land. Consequently, this implies that it was difficult for the committee of troubled land to decide the second type of You-To among Yoek-Dun-To in Suwon-gun as private land.

Abstract

Since the end of 18th century, Suwon-Bu(水原府) had developed as a political-military city where Jang-Yong-Oi-Yong, a military camp, was founded and Dun-To(屯土), the land of providing material support to Jang-Yong-Oi-Yong, was established. This paper analyzes the feature of the Chosun government’s survey on Yeok-Dun-To(驛屯土) in Suwon in the late of Great Han Empire. According to the Hwa-Sung-Ji(華城誌) written in 1831, Dun-To under the control of Suwon-Bu consisted of total 28 farmlands of Dun(屯) including 8 farmlands in Suwon-Bu, 5 farmlands in Yongin-Hyun, 6 farmlands in Kyunggi-Do, 3 farmlands in Chungcheong-Do, and 6 farmlands in Hwanghe-Do. The gross area of Dun-To reached 728.088 gyul(結) and 5,770.9 durak(斗落), only 18.5% of which was located in Suwon-Bu and the rest of which was located outside of the city. This implies that Suwon-Bu had been highly regarded as the new city based on city development policy of the Chosun government. The government purchased the farmlands of Deyou-Dun(大有屯) and Chukmanje-Dun(祝萬堤屯) and run these ones through the landowner system(地主制) in which the landowner, the government in this case, collects land rent from the peasants. The rest of farmlands, on the other hand, collected 100 du(斗) or 200 du of millet per gyul(結) from peasants in the form of land tax instead of land rent. Under this system, the overall scale of Dun-To had been largely maintained until the end of 19th century. In the action of Gab-O-Seung-Chong(甲午陞摠) which planned to abolish the tax-free farmland system and the survey on Yeok-Dun-To in 1894, Deyou-Dun and Chukmanje-Dun were excluded from targets of survey, which seems to prepare for the following investigation of land ownership. The overall amount of Dun-To under the control of Suwon-gun accounted for 7.3% of the gross area recorded in land ledger of Suwon-gun and 14.7% of taxed land, which allows us to see the scale of Dun-To in Suwon-Bu. In accordance with Ul-Mi-Sa-Pan(乙未査辦) of 1895 in which the Agriculture and Business Department of the Enlightenment Party Government investigated a demesne of the state in Suwon-gun, the results were as follows: 209.134 gyul of Yeok-To, 260.771 gyul of Dun-To, 42.701 gyul of Gung-Bang-Jyun(宮房田) and 166.46 gyul of Mok-Jang-To(牧場土). The basic unit of this survey was Durak which was an absolute unit for calculating area of land, and the land rent (or land tax) was charged every 100 duraks. Although this seems certainly a kind of preparations for the investigation of land ownership, it was still crucial to figure out and check the land rent (or land tax) of Yeok-Dun-To. The land rent was as low as 3 or 4 du of millet per durak since peasants paid fixed rent in advance regardless of how much they could produce in harvest season. The survey conducted by the Military Department, which took over the right of management of Yeok-To from the Agriculture and Business Department in 1897, identified that most of Dun-To was under control of Kung-Nae-Bu, the Department of Royal Household. This implies how Great Han Empire operated the government as well as how much of the demesne of the state belonged to Kung-Nae-Bu. While this survey showed that the characteristic of land rent (or land tax) differed from each other in various ways, the average rent, in the case of rice field, constituted 3 du of millet per one durak. Even though Kwang-Mu-Sa-Gum(光武査檢) since 1899, a kind of the self-survey of Nae-Chang-Won(內藏院) on its private land, basically followed the model of one conducted by the Military Department, the effort to take the control over Dun-To located in other areas was no more significant in that the farmlands in the center such as A-Mun-Dun-Jeon and Mok-Jang-To were entirely measured in the unit of Gun. In particular, by measuring all of farmlands as durak, this survey distinguished itself from the one of Gyul-Bu(結負) based on the feudal way of collecting tax. The payment in kind replaced the one in money, and the average rent of comparable rice field still fell on the extent of 3.4 Du of millet per durak. As Nae-Chang-Won pursued to raise the rent, peasants complained of the unfairness of its double taxation; however, it was common for them to compromise until reaching the rate of private land’s rent. Kyung-Ri-Won(經理院) whose function and scale were downgraded from those of Nae-Chang-Won in 1905 surveyed the Yeok-Dun-To in Suwon-gun, most of which was identified in this survey: the gross area including 3 farmlands of Yeok-To and 24 farmlands of Dun-To was 756 Ilkyung, 15,324.1 durak, 122.838 Kyul, etc.. The law issued in June 1908 announced that government nationalized this Yeok-Dun-To in Suwon and vested its control in Tak-Ji-Bu(度支部). Since then, the actual survey on Yoek-Dun-To conducted by the Residency-General of Japan identified that state had the exclusive right of possession over the farmlands. The rent of rice field per durak in this period came to 5.3 du of millet for the first time, which was significantly close to the rent of private land. Consequently, this implies that it was difficult for the committee of troubled land to decide the second type of You-To among Yoek-Dun-To in Suwon-gun as private land.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. "經國大典", ~
  2. "正祖實錄", ~
  3. "高宗實錄", ~
  4. "日省錄", ~
  5. "輿地圖書", ~
  6. "華城誌", ~
  7. "華城城役儀軌", ~
  8. "華營重記 (奎 古大4259-73)", ~
  9. "畿甸營事例(水原) (규12200)", ~
  10. "畿甸營誌 (규12187)", ~
  11. "議案 (규20066)", ~
  12. "結戶貨法細則 (奎古 5127-10)", ~
  13. "舊韓國官報", ~
  14. "驛土所關文牒去案 (규17898-2)", ~
  15. "驛土所關文牒來案 (규17898-3)", ~
  16. "驛土所關査員質報存檔 (규17896)", ~
  17. "訓令照會存案 (규19143)", ~
  18. "廣州府水原府春川府開城府各樣免稅甲午陞摠抄冊 (규16616)", ~
  19. "京畿牧場量案(水原) (규19124)", ~
  20. "京畿各郡牧場量案抄錄 (규19615)", ~
  21. "京畿道各郡所在各屯土調査成冊 (규19550)", ~
  22. "章程 (규18960)", ~
  23. "內藏院各牧場驛土各屯土各樣稅額捧稅官章程 (규20627)", ~
  24. "各道各郡所在牧場屯土總目 (규19612)", ~
  25. "京畿各郡公土案, 內藏院各道公土案 (규19614)", ~
  26. "京畿各郡捧稅査正都案 (규21987)", ~
  27. "京畿各郡各驛屯田畓日耕斗落結卜賭額實數抄錄 (규19178)", ~
  28. "京畿道各郡訴狀 (규19148), In 各司謄錄 2" (1981), 국사편찬위원회
  29. "度支部公報 2" (1988), 亞細亞文化社
  30. "韓國稅制考 (奎 想伯古336.2)", ~
  31. "朝鮮寺刹史料 1", 조선총독부, ~ (1911)
  32. "邑誌(京畿道)" (1982), 亞細亞文化社
  33. 越智唯七, "新舊對照朝鮮全道府郡面里洞名稱一覽" (1917), 中央市場
  34. 和田一郞, "朝鮮土地地稅制度調査報告書" (1967), 宗高書房
  35. 한국법제연구원, "朝鮮不動産用語略解", ~ (2006)
  36. 수원시사편찬위원회, "水原市史" (1996)
  37. 朴贊勝, "韓末 驛土 屯土에서의 地主經營의 강화와 抗租", 韓國史論, 9 (1983)
  38. 李泰鎭, "正祖代의 王權强化와 壯勇營 經營, In 朝鮮後記의 政治와 軍營制變遷" (1985), 한국연구원
  39. 金容燮, "近代韓國農業史硏究(增補版) 下" (1990), 一潮閣
  40. 裵英淳, "韓末日帝初期의 土地調査와 地稅改正, In 韓末日帝初期의 土地調査와 地稅改正" (2002), 영남대출판부
  41. 박진태, "대한제국 초기의 국유지 조사, In 대한제국의 토지조사사업" (1995), 민음사
  42. 박진태, "甲午改革期 국유지조사의 성격", 成大史林, 12·13 (1997)
  43. 박천우, "신읍치 시대의 수원, In 水原市史(上)" (1996), 수원시사편찬위원회
  44. 廉定燮, "正祖 後半 水利施設 築造와 屯田經營 –華城城役을 중심으로-", 韓國學報, 82 (1996)
  45. 염정섭, "18세기 말 華城府 수리시설 축조와 屯田 경영", 농업사연구, 9(1), pp.55~96 (2010), 한국농업사학회
  46. 송찬섭, "正祖代 壯勇營穀의 設置와 運營", 韓國文化, 24 (1999)
  47. 최홍규, "정조의 화성건설" (2001), 일지사
  48. 정해득, "정조시대 현륭원 조성과 수원" (2009), 신구문화사
  49. 이영호, "한말 일제초 근대적 토지소유권의 확정과 국유·민유의 분기 -경기도 안산 석장둔(石場屯)의 사례-", 역사와 현실, (77), pp.281~319 (2010), 한국역사연구회
  50. 이영호, "근대전환기 궁장토 소유권의 향방 : 경상도 창원 龍洞宮田畓 ‘永作宮屯=租200斗型’의 사례", 한국학연구, (24), pp.145~179 (2011), 한국학연구소
  51. 최원규, "한말 일제초기 공토 정책과 국유민유 분쟁", 한국민족문화, (45), pp.119~170 (2012), 한국민족문화연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)