통감부시기 궁방전의 소유권 판별과 조선토지조사사업 국유지분쟁의 원인

Abstract

The distribution of collection amount connecting the collection amount, occurrence origin and management type of Royal Households’ Land has been checked to grasp if it is possible to discriminate the ownership of Royal Households’ Land is possible or not passing through the change progress over a long period of time. The Gungbang managed with the indirect method, the collection amount of the farmland that the first occurrence origin couldn’t be known has been distributed intensively in less than 100 do. The practical owner of this farmland was the people. The collection amount, occurrence origin and management type of Royal Households’ Land has the mutual connectivity, plays the important index role capable of discriminating the land ownership, could discriminate the ownership of Royal Households’ Land through this. But, the Japanese imperialism didn’t apply these criteria by implementing the Actual Survey of Yeok-Dun-To. The Japanese Imperialism denied Jungdabju and Dojang being the practical owner of Yeok-Dun-To by implementing the Actual Survey of Yeok-Dun-To and intended to secure the private land included in the Yeok-Dun-To as the national land. And Japanese Imperialism intended to secure the national land to the maximum by including the Yeok-Dun-To that Office of Crown Prosperities has returned to the private land. The dispute of national land occurred extensively in the Chosun Land Survey Project as the Japanese Imperialism made the output of the Actual Survey of Yeok-Dun-To that has been promoted to the direction securing the national land to the maximum as the object of inspection as it is and utilized in the investigation of national land. The cause that the dispute of national land occurred in the Chosun Land Survey Project was in the policy of Japanese Imperialism intending to secure the national land to the maximum.