북한의 남한 점령기 민간인 학살― 한국정부와 미군(KWC) 조사기록의 비교를 중심으로 ―
A Study on the South Korean Civilian Massacre during the North Korean Occupation of South Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this article is to analyze on the South Korean Civilian Massacre by the North Korean Army and the left wings during the North Korean Occupation of South Korea. This paper is aimed to put a valuation on the problematic issues in War Crimes Division in Korea(KWC). This study was the reference of conducted with following documents: NARA, RG 153 Records of the Office of the Judge Advocate General Army, International Affairs Division; War Crimes Branch; “Investigation of Atrocities against POW’s in Korea”, 1952-1954, Entry A1 181, Box 891-976, KWC #1∼#1848; “Interim Historical Report”, 30 June 1953; “Final Historical and Operational Report”, 31. May 1954. Since the outbreak of the Massacre, the existing studies regarding this issue concentrated on elucidating actual conditions of civilian massacre and studies in the region have been still focused on understanding each regional cases, expected size, and so on. However, it has been challenged to understand entire matters of victims and wrongdoers because the signed confession research throughout the area sampled some regions. Therefore, this study suggest a debate on the three problematic issues in those historical records. I found that those historical records oncy emphasize the perspectives of the anti-communism in while analyzing the massacres. Also they have been recorded without the sufficient and reliable resources. They have only been discussed about the mass slaughter committed by several specific forces which are included with the North Korean government, the police of the North Korean government, and the South Korean communists. We have to recognize other mass slaughters happened in the same region from July 1950 to January 1951. Especially, the mass slaughter of civilians, the murders of people who acted in a way to Anti North Korea happened in the same areas. Thus, I believe that we have to give a definition of other massacres. Most historical records do not demonstrate the reason many people should have been victimized in the massacres. For example, even though they put many pages to describe the massacre, there are few reliable resources in them. As a result of the poor research achievements on the historical records, it is very hard for us to identify what kinds of “military command chains” the massacres had been carried out. Thus, it is still ambiguous to what extent North Korean government involved in those tragedies. I think that the massacres happened during Korean War should be researched from the multidimensional viewpoints by closely relating to political, economical, and social issues. These approaches help us bring objectivity into my research. I also think that if we can make any research with more possible reliability and objectivity, that research would allow us to find the person who were responsible for those mass slaughters, and the reason they happened in the time. This work will help add further studies based on empirical researches that have been conducted until now and define that the massacre occurred independently or the government intervened in the massacre.
Abstract
The main purpose of this article is to analyze on the South Korean Civilian Massacre by the North Korean Army and the left wings during the North Korean Occupation of South Korea. This paper is aimed to put a valuation on the problematic issues in War Crimes Division in Korea(KWC). This study was the reference of conducted with following documents: NARA, RG 153 Records of the Office of the Judge Advocate General Army, International Affairs Division; War Crimes Branch; “Investigation of Atrocities against POW’s in Korea”, 1952-1954, Entry A1 181, Box 891-976, KWC #1∼#1848; “Interim Historical Report”, 30 June 1953; “Final Historical and Operational Report”, 31. May 1954. Since the outbreak of the Massacre, the existing studies regarding this issue concentrated on elucidating actual conditions of civilian massacre and studies in the region have been still focused on understanding each regional cases, expected size, and so on. However, it has been challenged to understand entire matters of victims and wrongdoers because the signed confession research throughout the area sampled some regions. Therefore, this study suggest a debate on the three problematic issues in those historical records. I found that those historical records oncy emphasize the perspectives of the anti-communism in while analyzing the massacres. Also they have been recorded without the sufficient and reliable resources. They have only been discussed about the mass slaughter committed by several specific forces which are included with the North Korean government, the police of the North Korean government, and the South Korean communists. We have to recognize other mass slaughters happened in the same region from July 1950 to January 1951. Especially, the mass slaughter of civilians, the murders of people who acted in a way to Anti North Korea happened in the same areas. Thus, I believe that we have to give a definition of other massacres. Most historical records do not demonstrate the reason many people should have been victimized in the massacres. For example, even though they put many pages to describe the massacre, there are few reliable resources in them. As a result of the poor research achievements on the historical records, it is very hard for us to identify what kinds of “military command chains” the massacres had been carried out. Thus, it is still ambiguous to what extent North Korean government involved in those tragedies. I think that the massacres happened during Korean War should be researched from the multidimensional viewpoints by closely relating to political, economical, and social issues. These approaches help us bring objectivity into my research. I also think that if we can make any research with more possible reliability and objectivity, that research would allow us to find the person who were responsible for those mass slaughters, and the reason they happened in the time. This work will help add further studies based on empirical researches that have been conducted until now and define that the massacre occurred independently or the government intervened in the massacre.
참고문헌 (24)
- 공보처통계국, "서울특별시 피해자명부(1950.6.25-9.28)", 통계국, ~ (1950)
- 내무부 통계국, "대한민국통계연감(창간호)", 통계국, ~ (1952)
- 공보처 통계국, "6․25사변 피살자명부 (1-4권)", 통계국, ~ (1953)
- 공보처통계국, "6․25사변 종합피해조사표", 통계국, ~ (1954)
- 국방부정훈국전사편찬회, "한국전란2년지(1951.6-1952.6)", 국방부, ~ (1953)
- NARA, "RG 153 Records of the Office of the Judge Advocate General Army, International Affairs Division; War Crimes Branch; “Investigation of Atrocities against POW’s in Korea”, 1952-1954", Entry A1 181, Box 891-976, KWC #1 - #1848.; “Interim Historical Report, 30 June 1953; “Final Historical and Operational Report”, ~ (1954)
- 김동춘, "전쟁과 사회" (2000), 돌베게
- 김기진, "한국전쟁과 집단학살-미국 기밀문서의 최초 증언" (2005), 푸른역사
- 함평군 한국전쟁기간 민간인 희생자 피해연구 보고서, "함평군", 전라도 함평, ~ (2006)
- 피해자 현황조사 용역결과 최종결과보고서, "전남대 사회과학연구소", 전남대, ~ (2009)
- 한국역사연구회현대사분과, "역사학의 시선으로 읽는 한국전쟁" (2010), 휴머니스트
- 역사문제연구소, "한국전쟁에 대한 11가지 시선" (2010), 역사비평사
- 박찬승, "마을로 간 한국전쟁" (2010), 돌베개
- 한국구술사학회, "구술사로 읽는 한국전쟁" (2011), 휴머니스트
- 서중석, "전쟁속의 또 다른 전쟁-미국 문서로 본 한국전쟁과 학살" (2011), 선인
- 김성동, "6․25때 좌익이 학살한 5만 9964명 명부 발견: 영광 대학살의 현장을 가다", 월간조선 (2003)
- 김행복, "북한군 양민학살에 관한 연구, In 한국전쟁의 새로운 연구 2" (2003), 신오성
- 정병준, "한국전쟁 초기 국민보도연맹원 예비검속·학살사건의 배경과 구조", 역사와 현실, (54), pp.91~130 (2004), 한국역사연구회
- 최정기, "해방-한국전쟁 형무소 실태 연구", (2) (2007), 제노사이드학회
- 지수걸, "공주의 한국전쟁과 전쟁피해", (3) (2008), 제노사이드학회
- 정병준, "한국전쟁기 남한 민간인 인명피해 조사의 유형과 특징-한국정부의 통계 · 명부를 중심으로-", 한국문화연구, 14, pp.133~171 (2008), 한국문화연구원
- 박정석, "전쟁과 폭력 - 영광 지역 한 마을 사람들의 기억을 중심으로", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (66), pp.226~257 (2004), 한국사회사학회
- 황윤희, "한국전쟁범죄조사단 문서 자료 소개-RG153, Investigation of Atrocities against POW’s in Korea", 숭실사학, 28 (2012)
