본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

두 번의 토지개혁과 냉전: 한국전쟁 前後 ‘38선 이북 수복지구’ 인제의 토지소유구조 변화

Two Land Reforms and the Cold War: The Change in the Land Ownership Structure in the Inje Area Representing One of the Reclaimed Districts North of the 38th Parallel before and after the Korean War

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study analyzes the characteristics of the Cold War that emerged during and after the two land reforms implemented in the reclaimed districts north of the 38th parallel. More to the point, a review of the features of the two land reforms carried out in local areas, and the impact of the Cold War thereon, is conducted based on an analysis of one of the reclaimed districts, namely Inje County in Gangwon Province. The change in the land ownership structure of the reclaimed districts in Inje was carried out in a multi-layered and complicated manner amid the clearing up of the structure and vestiges of Japanese colonialism and the advent of the Cold War. The transfer of the systems of the reclaimed districts north of the 38th parallel basically involved the incorporation from the North Korean system into the South Korean system. However, it was also related to the competition between the North and South Korean systems, as well as to the clearing up of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism. Right after liberation, North Korea sought to clear up the structure and vestiges of Japanese colonialism and to establish a people’s democracy as a means to showcase the superiority of their system over that of South Korea. For its part, South Korea intended to remove the people’s democracy that had been established under North Korean rule and to implement a capitalist system. This was accompanied by the management of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism as well as of the North Korean system. While the Cold War in Korea was a conflict and competition between North Korea and South Korea, or an element of the wider conflict and competition between the capitalist and communist systems respectively led by the United States and the Soviet Union, the transfer of the systems in the reclaimed districts can be regarded as the ‘intersection’ of the management of the structure and vestiges of Japanese colonialism and the Cold War. The hostile conflicts and confrontations between the two Koreas along the 38th parallel/military demarcation line that came as part of the wider Cold War exercised an overwhelming influence. The Cold War that erupted on the surface with the advent of the Korean War was the element that gave birth to the reclaimed districts. It also provided the cause for the failure to clear up of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism and to restore the nation after the war. The Cold War not only played a negative role in the clearing up of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism, but also in terms of the competition between the systems of the two Koreas. The two Koreas used agrarian and land reforms as a means to show off and prove that their respective system was superior to that of the other. However, the goals of these two reforms were only partially achieved and in some cases changed altogether.

Abstract

This study analyzes the characteristics of the Cold War that emerged during and after the two land reforms implemented in the reclaimed districts north of the 38th parallel. More to the point, a review of the features of the two land reforms carried out in local areas, and the impact of the Cold War thereon, is conducted based on an analysis of one of the reclaimed districts, namely Inje County in Gangwon Province. The change in the land ownership structure of the reclaimed districts in Inje was carried out in a multi-layered and complicated manner amid the clearing up of the structure and vestiges of Japanese colonialism and the advent of the Cold War. The transfer of the systems of the reclaimed districts north of the 38th parallel basically involved the incorporation from the North Korean system into the South Korean system. However, it was also related to the competition between the North and South Korean systems, as well as to the clearing up of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism. Right after liberation, North Korea sought to clear up the structure and vestiges of Japanese colonialism and to establish a people’s democracy as a means to showcase the superiority of their system over that of South Korea. For its part, South Korea intended to remove the people’s democracy that had been established under North Korean rule and to implement a capitalist system. This was accompanied by the management of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism as well as of the North Korean system. While the Cold War in Korea was a conflict and competition between North Korea and South Korea, or an element of the wider conflict and competition between the capitalist and communist systems respectively led by the United States and the Soviet Union, the transfer of the systems in the reclaimed districts can be regarded as the ‘intersection’ of the management of the structure and vestiges of Japanese colonialism and the Cold War. The hostile conflicts and confrontations between the two Koreas along the 38th parallel/military demarcation line that came as part of the wider Cold War exercised an overwhelming influence. The Cold War that erupted on the surface with the advent of the Korean War was the element that gave birth to the reclaimed districts. It also provided the cause for the failure to clear up of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism and to restore the nation after the war. The Cold War not only played a negative role in the clearing up of the vestiges of Japanese colonialism, but also in terms of the competition between the systems of the two Koreas. The two Koreas used agrarian and land reforms as a means to show off and prove that their respective system was superior to that of the other. However, the goals of these two reforms were only partially achieved and in some cases changed altogether.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. "每日申報", ~
  2. "조선중앙일보", ~
  3. "동아일보", ~
  4. "서울신문", ~
  5. 國史編纂委員會, "北韓關係史料集"
  6. 鄭在貞, "1945-50년 北朝鮮經濟資料集成", 東亞經濟硏究所
  7. "인제군 인제면당부 위원장 김흥순⟶인제군당부위원장: 38이남도주농호보고의건", ~ (1947)
  8. "인제군 북면당부 위원장 이천수⟶인제군당부위원장: 농민이거조사에 대한 건", ~ (1947)
  9. "인제군 남면당부 위원장 심상태⟶인제군당부위원장: 농민이거조사에 대한 건", 이상 통일부 북한자료센터 소장, ~ (1947)
  10. "麟蹄郡勢一班", 강원도 인제군, ~ (1930)
  11. 江原道, "緯北收復地區 地方行政一週年鑑" (1956), 江原日報社
  12. "1958년도 농지관계철, 1959년도 농지관계철", 이상 인제군 인제면, ~
  13. 대한민국국회, "제19회 국회임시회의속기록 제49호", ~ (1954)
  14. "제20회 국회정기회의속기록 제38호", ~ (1955)
  15. "권준호 인터뷰 (2007. 6. 16, 양구군 양구읍 자택)", ~ (2007)
  16. "김민수 인터뷰 (2007. 7. 6, 고성군 고성문화원)", ~ (2007)
  17. "김정호 인터뷰 (2011. 11. 16, 인제군 바르게살기운동협의회 사무실)", ~ (2011)
  18. "박상기ㆍ황도연 인터뷰 (2007. 7. 28, 양구군 양구읍 황도연 자택)", ~ (2007)
  19. "유성주 인터뷰 (2007. 7. 29, 양구군 남면 자택)", ~ (2007)
  20. "이호선ㆍ권영림 인터뷰 (2007. 6. 15, 양구군 남면 자택)", ~ (2007)
  21. "최용수 인터뷰 (2009. 3. 11, 인제군 인제읍 상동리 자택)", ~ (2009)
  22. "함주영 인터뷰 (2007. 7. 7, 고성군 죽왕면 자택)", ~ (2007)
  23. 姜萬吉, "日帝時代의 火田民生活", 동방학지, 27 (1981)
  24. 김성보, "북한의 토지개혁(1946년)과 농촌 계층 구성 변화—결정과정과 지역 사례—", 동방학지, (87) (1995)
  25. 김성보, "남북한 경제구조의 기원과 전개—북한 농업체제의 형성을 중심으로—" (2000), 역사비평사
  26. 김성보, "농지개혁 연구" (2001), 연세대학교 출판부
  27. 지개혁사연구, "김성호", 한국농촌경제연구원, ~ (1989)
  28. 김용진, "사례연구: 농지개혁법이 農地改革法이 三八以北의 收腹地區에 施行된 時期", 法曹, 16(1) (1967)
  29. 收復地區의 南ㆍ北韓 農地改革에 관한 硏究, "金沄根", 한국농촌경제연구원, ~ (1989)
  30. 손전후, "우리나라 토지개혁사" (1983), 과학백과사전출판사
  31. 신기욱, "일제파시즘 지배정책과 민중생활" (2004), 혜안
  32. 이송순, "일제하 1930ㆍ40년대 농가경제의 추이와 농민생활", 역사문제연구, 8 (2002)
  33. 이순근, "북조선 농업발전을 위한 제 문제", 인민, (창간) (1946), 북조선임시인민위원회
  34. 정범석, "農地改革法에 관한 考察: 收復地區 農地를 中心으로", 건대학술지, 13 (1972)
  35. 정연태, "1930년대 ‘조선농지령’과 일제의 농촌통제", 역사와 현실, 4 (1990)
  36. 지수걸, "일제하 농민조합운동연구―1930년대 혁명적 농민조합운동—" (1993), 역사비평사
  37. 한모니까, "1947~49년 인제군 개답(開畓)사업에 나타난 당·정의 역할과 인민노력동원", 역사와 현실, (60), pp.59~95 (2006), 한국역사연구회
  38. 한모니까, "한국전쟁 이후 ‘收復地區’에서의 농지개혁법 적용 과정과 그 의미", 한국근현대사연구, (62), pp.109~139 (2012), 한국근현대사학회
  39. 한모니까, "한국전쟁 전후 '수복지구'의 체제 변동 과정 : 강원도 인제군을 중심으로", 박사, 국사학, pp.2009
  40. 홍석률, "냉전의 예외와 규칙 - 냉전사를 통해 본 한국 현대사", 역사비평, (110), pp.112~135 (2015), 역사문제연구소

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)