Class Differences for Women in Attaining Work-Family Balance and Consciousness of Government Responsibility for Child Care: Focusing on the Korean Case
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to closely examine the issues embedded in the work-family conflict with an emphasis on women's social rights. This research focuses on the Korean case, which has shown plummeting birthrate largely due to difficulties of attaining work-family balance. Focusing on work-family conflicts, in which various women’s social rights issues are presented, and examines class differentials among women in both the relative difficulty in attaining work-family balance and public consciousness of social rights via attitude towards government responsibility for childcare. The study finds that there is class differences embedded in “difficulties of work-family balance.” The group with the most favorable environment for work-family balance is the middle class or the middle class–standard employment group. Secondly, there is a lack of class differentials among women regarding “consciousness of governmental responsibility for childcare derived from social rights.” It can be interpreted that class consciousness is not commensurate with class interests, despite material differences among classes in the relative ease of attaining work-family balance.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to closely examine the issues embedded in the work-family conflict with an emphasis on women's social rights. This research focuses on the Korean case, which has shown plummeting birthrate largely due to difficulties of attaining work-family balance. Focusing on work-family conflicts, in which various women’s social rights issues are presented, and examines class differentials among women in both the relative difficulty in attaining work-family balance and public consciousness of social rights via attitude towards government responsibility for childcare. The study finds that there is class differences embedded in “difficulties of work-family balance.” The group with the most favorable environment for work-family balance is the middle class or the middle class–standard employment group. Secondly, there is a lack of class differentials among women regarding “consciousness of governmental responsibility for childcare derived from social rights.” It can be interpreted that class consciousness is not commensurate with class interests, despite material differences among classes in the relative ease of attaining work-family balance.
참고문헌 (32)
- Acker, J., "Women and social stratification : A case of intellectual sexism", American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), pp.936~945 (1973)
- 장지연, "돌봄노동의 사회화 유형과 여성노동권", 페미니즘연구, 11(2), pp.1~47 (2011), 한국여성연구소
- Esping-Andersen, G., "The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton" (1990), Princeton University Press
- Esping-Andersen, G., "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Goldthorpe, J. H., "Women and class analysis : In defence of the conventional view", Sociology, 17(4), pp.465~488 (1983)
- 허수연, "복지국가의‘자녀유무별 여성임금격차(Family gap)'비교연구 : 가족정책과 노동시장구조의 영향을 중심으로", 사회복지연구, 41(2), pp.279~308 (2010), 한국사회복지연구회
- 황정미, "여성 사회권의 담론적 구성과 아내.어머니.노동자 지위", 페미니즘연구, 2007(7), pp.1~42 (2007), 한국여성연구소
- Jeon, B. Y., "Polarization of Labor Market and its Policy Challenge", Labor Review (2005), Korean Labor Institute
- Kim, B. S., "Employment structure in female labor market", Labor Review, 87, pp.64~73 (2012)
- 김영미, "동아시아 가구고용형태의 다양성: 한국, 일본, 대만 비교 연구", 여성학논집, 29(2), pp.107~137 (2012), 한국여성연구원
- Kim, Y. M., "Work-family policy from perspective of intersection of gender and class", Journal of Social Science, 31(2), pp.1~26 (2014)
- 김영미, "기혼여성 노동시장의 양극화와 가구소득 불평등의 변화", 경제와 사회, (77), pp.79~106 (2008), 비판사회학회
- 김영란, "성 인지적 관점에서 본 사회권의 재정립에 관한 연구", 경제와 사회, 54, pp.8~208 (2002), 비판사회학회
- 김영순, "비정규직 여성노동자의 사회권을 통해 본 한국의 젠더체제", 사회보장연구, 26(1), pp.261~287 (2010), 한국사회보장학회
- 김윤태, "한국의 복지태도의 정치적 역동성: 탈계급성과 정치적 기회의 재평가", 한국학연구, (45), pp.183~212 (2013), 한국학연구소
- Korpi, W., "The Democratic Class Struggle" (1983), Boston
- Korpi. W., "New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization : Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975-95", The American Political Science Review, 97(3), pp.425~446 (2003)
- 이숙진, "돌봄노동의 제도화와 여성들의 차이", 페미니즘연구, 11(2), pp.49~83 (2011), 한국여성연구소
- Leira, A., "Caring as social right : Cash for child care and daddy leave. Social Politics : International studies in gender", State &Society, 5(3), pp.362~378 (1998)
- Lewis, J., "Gender and welfare regimes : Further thoughts. Social politics : International studies in gender", State & Society, 4(2), pp.160~177 (1997)
- Marshall, T. H., "Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays" (1950), Cambridge University Press
- O’Connor, J. S., "Gender, class and citizenship in the comparative analysis of welfare state regimes : Theoretical and methodological issues", The British Journal of Sociology, 44(3), pp.501~518 (1993)
- O’Connor, J. S., "From women in the welfare state to gendering welfare state regimes", Current Sociology, 44(2), pp.1~130 (1996)
- Orloff, A. S., "Gender and the social rights of citizenship : The comparative analysis of state policies and gender relations", American Sociological Review, 58(3), pp.303~328 (1993)
- 박홍주, "기혼여성노동자의 일·가족 경험과 직업의식", 한국여성학, 20(2), pp.141~178 (2004), 한국여성학회
- Park, S. M., "Women in nonstandard employment and parental rights", Annual Conference of Korean Sociological Association Conference, pp.81~93 (2007)
- Sainsbury, D., "Gender and Welfare State Regimes" (1999), Oxford
- 신광영, "서비스 사회와 계급구성의 변화", 동향과 전망, (68), pp.1~18 (2006), 한국사회과학연구회
- Sørensen, A., "Women, family and class", Annual Review of Sociology, 20(1), pp.27~47 (1994)
- Stanworth, M., "Women and class analysis : A reply to John Goldthorpe", Sociology, 18(2), pp.159~170 (1984)
- Taylor-Gooby, P., "New risks, new welfare: the transformation of the European welfare state" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Wright, E. O., "Classes" (1985), Verso