본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일제강점초기 조선의 형사사법구조 - 조선형사령을 중심으로 -

The Criminal Procedural System under Early Japan`s Colonial Imperialism - Centering around the Criminal Ordinance of Chosun -

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This study is intended to examine the criminal procedural system that characterized the legislation of Korea that started with the Japanese annexation of Korea in 1910. The disgraceful annexation of Korea by Japan on August 29, 1910, drove Korean Jurisprudence and legal culture into separating previously modern Reform in law. During the thirty-five years of Japanese rule of Korea, the Korean legal system and jurisprudence became by the Japanese. The 35-year of Japanese rule is generally divided into the period of the law of criminal procedure of Japanese as Meiji era (1912), the period of the law of criminal procedure of Japanese as Taisho era (1922), and the Period of war preparation(1944). But the sphere of the study itself is usually confined to the criminal procedure in the first period. The judicial system of criminal action under the rule of Japanese imperialism had intrinsic problem that, unlike Japan`s own land, could not organize the court 'by the law' in the constitution of Japanese imperialism. The first stage of the colonial modern criminal law system was completed through the Korea-Japan Memorandum on the Delegation of the Administration of Courts and Prisons in November 1909, the Japanese Governor-General`s Ordinance on Penal Matters in Korea in March 1912. The modern law system that the Japanese had established in their country since Meiji Renovation look after the model of the European legal systems such as France and German seemed to come into force in Korea, but it was not fully implemented. That are extension of application of that ordinance, limitation of Korean people`s right of defence, ordinance of medieval flogging, extension of the preliminary inspection, endowment with summary punishment to the police, ect. Especially, the stage of pre-trail preliminary investigation is meaningful for the police and state attorney. Futhermore, the summary punishment to the police is regarded as another accelerated procedural system, which is provided to speed up the process in relation specially to minor offences. This can only be done on application of the police in cases of simple facts.

Abstract

This study is intended to examine the criminal procedural system that characterized the legislation of Korea that started with the Japanese annexation of Korea in 1910. The disgraceful annexation of Korea by Japan on August 29, 1910, drove Korean Jurisprudence and legal culture into separating previously modern Reform in law. During the thirty-five years of Japanese rule of Korea, the Korean legal system and jurisprudence became by the Japanese. The 35-year of Japanese rule is generally divided into the period of the law of criminal procedure of Japanese as Meiji era (1912), the period of the law of criminal procedure of Japanese as Taisho era (1922), and the Period of war preparation(1944). But the sphere of the study itself is usually confined to the criminal procedure in the first period. The judicial system of criminal action under the rule of Japanese imperialism had intrinsic problem that, unlike Japan`s own land, could not organize the court 'by the law' in the constitution of Japanese imperialism. The first stage of the colonial modern criminal law system was completed through the Korea-Japan Memorandum on the Delegation of the Administration of Courts and Prisons in November 1909, the Japanese Governor-General`s Ordinance on Penal Matters in Korea in March 1912. The modern law system that the Japanese had established in their country since Meiji Renovation look after the model of the European legal systems such as France and German seemed to come into force in Korea, but it was not fully implemented. That are extension of application of that ordinance, limitation of Korean people`s right of defence, ordinance of medieval flogging, extension of the preliminary inspection, endowment with summary punishment to the police, ect. Especially, the stage of pre-trail preliminary investigation is meaningful for the police and state attorney. Futhermore, the summary punishment to the police is regarded as another accelerated procedural system, which is provided to speed up the process in relation specially to minor offences. This can only be done on application of the police in cases of simple facts.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 정긍식, "한국근대법사고", pp.195~ (2002), 박영사
  2. 신동운, "일제하의 예심제도에 관하여", 서울대학교 법학, 27(1) (1986)
  3. 玉名友彦, "朝鮮刑事令繹義", 법원도서관, 1~ (2005)
  4. 대법원, "바람직한 형 사사법시스템의 모색 자료집(III)", 25~ (2004)
  5. "朝鮮總督府 官報 西紀 1912年 (明治 45年) 3月 22日)", ~ (1912)
  6. 문준영, "제국일본의 식민지 형사사법체계의 형성", 132~133
  7. 鈴木敬夫, "법을 통한 조선식 민지 지배에 관한 연구", pp.82~83 (1989), 고려대 민족문화연구소
  8. 신동운, "일제하의 형사절차에 관한 연구, In 한국법사학논총 박병호교수 환갑기념논문집", pp.409~ (1991), 박영사
  9. 이완규, "형사소송법연구II", pp.121~122 (2011), 법문사
  10. "朝鮮高等法院 大正 2年 11月 24日 判決 刑上 第106號", ~
  11. 신동운, "일제하의 형사절차에 관한 연구", pp.410~
  12. 정긍식, "한국근대법사고", pp.268~
  13. 이완규, "형사소송법특강", pp.118~144 (2006), 법문사
  14. 김병화, "한국사법사 (근세편)", pp.35~47 (1992), 일조각
  15. 박병호, "근세의 법과 법사상", pp.368~392 (1996), 진원
  16. 김병화, "한국사법 사", pp.41~
  17. 대법원, "바람직한 형사사법시스템의 모색 자료집 III", 30~ (2004)
  18. 일제하의 형사절차에 관한 연구, "신동운", 407~
  19. 신동운, "일제하의 예심제도에 관하여", pp.151~157
  20. 이완규, "형사소송법 특강", pp.118~144 (2006), 법문사
  21. 최종고, "심포지엄: 법의식과 법생활에서의 일제유산의 극복", 법사학연구, (16), pp.17~21 (1995), 한국법사학회
  22. 정긍식, "한국근대법사고", pp.267~ (2002), 박영사
  23. 문준영, "帝國日本의 植民地 刑事司法制度의 形成 -1895~1912년 臺灣과 朝鮮에서의 法院과 刑事法規를 중심으로-", 법사학연구, (23), pp.97~138 (2001), 한국법사학회
  24. 박은식, "한국독립운동지혈사", pp.97~ (1979), 서문당
  25. 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮總督府統計年報", ~ (1910)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)