본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

文武王의 安勝 책봉과 그 배경

The King Munmu's Investiture for Anseung and its Background

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

On August 1st, 670 King Munmu of Silla dispatched Geumsumisan(金須彌山) as an envoy and proclaimed Anseung as the King of Goguryeo. Geom Mo-jam crowned Anseung as king in June and immediately asked Silla for help. Silla responded to this request. According to Samguksagi Sillabongi(『三國史記』 新羅本紀), King Munmu's investiture for Anseung was the decision that matched justice of the world and command of the emperor. Considering the international situation at the time, however, it seems difficult to say that King Munmu's actions were purely aimed at providing aid for Goguryeo's refugees. Analyzing Munmu's royal certificate, Anseung was described as a justified successor to Jumong, founder king of Goguryo regardless of King Bojang(寶藏王) staying in Tang. Whether it is true or not, it can be shown that political realm of Goguryeo was sustained through Anseung. Perhaps it seems that King Munmu deliberately emphasized Anseung's authority in order to embrace Goguryeo refugees additionally while he claimed an international status equal to that of Tang at the beginning of war with Tang. In the same context, it can be seen as Munmu's deliberate action that Geom Mo-jam, who actually led to the group of refugees, didn't appear in the record of Samguksagi since June in 690. Through the part of Goryeomoban(高麗謀叛) in Letter of Response to Seol In-gwi(答薛仁貴書), which seems that its content was passed on autonomously in Silla, the fact is identified that Munmu defined that Geom Mo-jam plotted Goguryeo's revolt and called him a rebel to have to conquer. Munmu was grounded on the event that Geom Mo-jam killed Tang's official and Beob-an, who was a priest. It can be seen that Munmu probably secured the justification that Silla did not accept the traitor defined as the target of subjugation by Gaozong of Tang(唐高宗), while excluding Geom Mo-jam for the purpose of integrating Goguryeo's refugees into Silla fundamentally. Eventually, King Munmu intentionally excluded or ignored Geom Mo-jam, emphasizing only the symbolism and authority of Anseung, and then embraced and reorganized Goguryeo's refugees.

Abstract

On August 1st, 670 King Munmu of Silla dispatched Geumsumisan(金須彌山) as an envoy and proclaimed Anseung as the King of Goguryeo. Geom Mo-jam crowned Anseung as king in June and immediately asked Silla for help. Silla responded to this request. According to Samguksagi Sillabongi(『三國史記』 新羅本紀), King Munmu's investiture for Anseung was the decision that matched justice of the world and command of the emperor. Considering the international situation at the time, however, it seems difficult to say that King Munmu's actions were purely aimed at providing aid for Goguryeo's refugees. Analyzing Munmu's royal certificate, Anseung was described as a justified successor to Jumong, founder king of Goguryo regardless of King Bojang(寶藏王) staying in Tang. Whether it is true or not, it can be shown that political realm of Goguryeo was sustained through Anseung. Perhaps it seems that King Munmu deliberately emphasized Anseung's authority in order to embrace Goguryeo refugees additionally while he claimed an international status equal to that of Tang at the beginning of war with Tang. In the same context, it can be seen as Munmu's deliberate action that Geom Mo-jam, who actually led to the group of refugees, didn't appear in the record of Samguksagi since June in 690. Through the part of Goryeomoban(高麗謀叛) in Letter of Response to Seol In-gwi(答薛仁貴書), which seems that its content was passed on autonomously in Silla, the fact is identified that Munmu defined that Geom Mo-jam plotted Goguryeo's revolt and called him a rebel to have to conquer. Munmu was grounded on the event that Geom Mo-jam killed Tang's official and Beob-an, who was a priest. It can be seen that Munmu probably secured the justification that Silla did not accept the traitor defined as the target of subjugation by Gaozong of Tang(唐高宗), while excluding Geom Mo-jam for the purpose of integrating Goguryeo's refugees into Silla fundamentally. Eventually, King Munmu intentionally excluded or ignored Geom Mo-jam, emphasizing only the symbolism and authority of Anseung, and then embraced and reorganized Goguryeo's refugees.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "三國史記", ~
  2. "三國遺事", ~
  3. "舊唐書", ~
  4. "新唐書", ~
  5. "資治通鑑", ~
  6. "唐會要", ~
  7. "冊府元龜", ~
  8. "通典", ~
  9. 李基白, "韓國史講座-古代篇" (1982), 一潮閣
  10. 주보돈, "김춘추와 그의 사람들" (2018), 지식산업사
  11. 강경구, "高句麗 復興運動 新考察", 한국상고사학보, 47(47), pp.89~113 (2005), 한국상고사학회
  12. 金甲周, "統一期의 新羅社會硏究" (1987), 東國大學校 新羅文化硏究所
  13. 김강훈, "요동지역의 고구려부흥운동과 검모잠", 군사, (99), pp.1~38 (2016), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
  14. 김수진, "670년 평양 일대 고구려 유민의 남하와 부흥운동의 전개", 역사와 실학, (72), pp.5~37 (2020), 역사실학회
  15. 김수태, "李基白先生古稀紀念 韓國史學論叢(上)" (1994), 一潮閣
  16. 김진한, "「답설인귀서」(答薛仁貴書)에 보이는 신라·당밀약 기사의 사료적 검토", 인문논총, 71(1), pp.253~277 (2014), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  17. 盧泰敦, "對唐戰爭期(669~676) 新羅의 對外關係와 軍事活動", 軍史, 34 (1997)
  18. 梁炳龍, "羅唐戰爭 進行過程에 보이는 高句麗遺民의 對唐戰爭", 史叢, 46 (1997)
  19. 박현숙, "「답설인귀서」, 나당전쟁기 신라 외교의 표상", 내일을 여는역사, 10 (2002)
  20. 방용철, "고구려 부흥전쟁의 발발과 그 성격", 대구사학, 133, pp.115~149 (2018), 대구사학회[DOI]
  21. 李丙燾, "高句麗의 一部遺民에 대한 唐의 抽戶政策", 震檀學報, 25・26 (1964)
  22. 이상훈, "노태돈 교수 정년기념논총2-한국 고대사 연구의 자료와 해석" (2014), 사계절
  23. 이재석, "7세기 후반 報德國의 존재 의의와 왜국", 일본역사연구, (31), pp.33~52 (2010), 일본사학회
  24. 이정빈, "고연무의 고구려 부흥군과 부흥운동의 전개", 역사와 현실, (72), pp.131~157 (2009), 한국역사연구회
  25. 임기환, "報德國考", 강좌 한국고대사, 10 (2003), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
  26. 정선여, "신라로 유입된 고구려 유민의 동향 - 報德國 주민을 중심으로 -", 역사와 담론, (56), pp.71~106 (2010), 호서사학회
  27. 정원주, "唐의 고구려 지배정책과 安勝의 行步", 한국고대사탐구, (29), pp.75~118 (2018), 한국고대사탐구학회[DOI]
  28. 정원주, "안승(安勝)의 향방(向方)과 고구려 부흥운동", 군사, (110), pp.39~92 (2019), 국방부군사편찬연구소[DOI]
  29. 조인성, "고구려의 정치와 사회" (2007), 고구려역사재단
  30. 존・씨・재미슨, "羅唐同盟의 瓦解-韓中記事 取捨의 比較", 歷史學報, 44 (1969)
  31. 주보돈, "7世紀 羅唐關係의 始末", 영남학, (20), pp.131~172 (2011), 영남문화연구원[DOI]
  32. 최재도, "漢城의 高句麗國 再檢討", 동북아역사논총, (47), pp.139~169 (2015), 동북아역사재단
  33. 최호원, "고구려 검모잠・안승 세력과 대신라관계 인식", 신라사학보, (49), pp.171~206 (2020), 신라사학회
  34. 池內宏, "滿鮮史硏究』上世 第二册" (1951), 吉川弘文館
  35. 村上四男, "新羅と小高句麗國", 朝鮮學報, 37・38 (1966)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)