프랑스어 전미래Futur antérieur의 양상적 용법에 관한 연구
A Study on Modal Use of ‘Future Perfect’ Tense in French Language
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examined the fundamental nature of the ‘future perfect’ tense focusing on the language theory of ‘Gustave Guillaume’. He designated ‘future perfect’ tense ‘futur antérieur catégorique’ in traditional grammar and distinguished its value categorized as future of denoting position future time and as future of interpretation that was obtainedunder the concept of supposition which future brings ‘Future perfect’ tense as future of denoting position future time is used together with ‘futur catégorique’ as immanence of ‘future’ tense and it is a tense related to future which expresses process which would be done earlier than ‘futur antérieur catégorique’. ‘Future perfect’ tense as future of interpretation is used for representing by conjecturing past fact and the result of conjectured fact is reserved until it unveils in the future. On the basis of theoretical speculation, meaning effect of ‘future perfect’ tense as interpreted future is as diverse as its uses besides conjecture. Since future time included ‘future perfect’ tense, tense of futur antérieur catégorique, and transcendental aspect are compositely act, ‘future perfect’ tense of future tense can represent the various aspects of the past facts.
Abstract
This paper examined the fundamental nature of the ‘future perfect’ tense focusing on the language theory of ‘Gustave Guillaume’. He designated ‘future perfect’ tense ‘futur antérieur catégorique’ in traditional grammar and distinguished its value categorized as future of denoting position future time and as future of interpretation that was obtainedunder the concept of supposition which future brings ‘Future perfect’ tense as future of denoting position future time is used together with ‘futur catégorique’ as immanence of ‘future’ tense and it is a tense related to future which expresses process which would be done earlier than ‘futur antérieur catégorique’. ‘Future perfect’ tense as future of interpretation is used for representing by conjecturing past fact and the result of conjectured fact is reserved until it unveils in the future. On the basis of theoretical speculation, meaning effect of ‘future perfect’ tense as interpreted future is as diverse as its uses besides conjecture. Since future time included ‘future perfect’ tense, tense of futur antérieur catégorique, and transcendental aspect are compositely act, ‘future perfect’ tense of future tense can represent the various aspects of the past facts.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김우진, "양상논리와 형이상학", pp.10~18 (2009), 새들녘
- 박옥숙, "의미의 논리를 위하여", pp.167~168 (1993), 한국문화사
- 장승일, "우리는 상에 대해 적어도 무엇을 말할 수 있는가?", 프랑스어문교육, 2, pp.219~238 (1994)
- Arnaut, L, "Grammaire expliquée du français", CLE International, 136, pp.339~340 (1810)
- Arrivé, M, "La Grammaire d’aujourd’hui: guide alphabéique de linguistique françise" (1986), Flammarion
- Azzopardi, S, "Le Futur et le Conditionnel: valeur en langue et effets de sens en discours. Analyse contrastive espagnol", français, de l’université Paul Valéry, 2012
- À propos d’un mouvement de pensée fondamental de la langue française, "Bidaud, S", Etudes Romanes de Brno, 123~130 (2013)
- Boteva, S, "Les temps futurs en français et en Bulgare", Langage, 165, pp.105~114 (2007)
- Charaudeau, P, "Grammaire du sens et de l’expression", pp.461~ (1992), Hachette
- Chevalier, J. C, "Grammaire Larousse du français contemporain", pp.494~ (1964), Larousse
- Ciszewska, E, "Comment peut-on déterminer les valeurs du futur antérieur", Romanica Cracoviensia, 11, pp.66~74 (2012)
- Culioli, A, "Valeurs modales et opéations énonciatives", Le Françis moderne, 4, pp.300~317 (1978)
- Engel, D.M, "Absolutely perfect? What is the status of ‘futur antérieur’", French Language Studies, 11, pp.201~220 (2001)
- Gosselin, L, "Les modalités en français!: la validation des représentations" (2010), Rodopi
- Grevisse, M, "Le bon usage: grammaire française avec des remarques sur la langue française d'aujourd'hui", pp.1156~ (1961), Duculot
- Guillaume, G, "Esquisse d'une grammaire descriptive de la langue française II", pp.303~315 (1944), Laval
- Guillaume, G, "Temps et Verbe", pp.21~59 (1970), Champion
- Guillaume, G, "Structure sémiologique et structure psychique de la langue française I", pp.138~ (1971), Laval
- Guillaume, G, "Esquisse d’une grammaire descriptive de la langue française II", pp.303~315 (1990), Laval
- Imbs, P, "L’emploi de temps verbaux en français moderne: essai de grammaire descriptive", pp.269~ (1960), Klincksieck
- Kazuko, T, "A propos du futur antérieur", L’Information Grammaticale, 97, pp.37~40 (2003)
- Krajčovičová, B. A, "L´expression et l´emploi du futur", pp.1~49 (2011), Brno
- Lyons, J, "Semantics", pp.452~ (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Martin, R, "Le futur linguistique: temps linéaire ou temps ramifié", Langages, 15(64), pp.81~92 (1981)
- Mauger, G, "Grammaire pratique du français d'aujourd'hui : langue parlée, langue écrite", pp.419~ (1968), Hachette
- Miquel, C, "Grammaire en dialogues, Niveau intermédiaire", pp.42~70 (2011), CLE International
- Novacova, I, "Le futur antérieur français: temps, aspect, modalité", Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literateur, pp.113~135 (2000)
- Ossipov, V, "Le françis moderne XLII", pp.20~33 (1974)
- Pinchon, J., "Grammaire du français classique et moderne", pp.648~ (1962), Hachette
- Taji, K, "À propos du futur antérieur", L’Information grammaticale, 97, pp.37~40 (2003)
- Yvon, H, "Le Françis moderne XXI", pp.167~177 (1953)