‘관형사형 어미＋성싶/듯싶/듯하-’의 기능 차이
A Study on Functional Differences between Adnominal Ending＋‘seong sip-’, ‘dus sip-’, and ‘dus ha-’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate functional differences of the grammatical collocations ‘adnominal ending＋seong sip/dus sip/dus ha-’. The first, compared to the bound noun ‘seong’, the bound noun ‘dus’ implicates not only positive dimension, but also negative dimension. Based on this difference, the grammatical collocations ‘adnominal ending＋seong sip-’ and ‘adnominal ending＋dus sip-’ can be distinguished on functional view point. Secondly, compared to ‘ha-’, ‘sip-’ has more subjective feature and it represents speaker’s strong subjective attitude. From this view point, the grammatical collocations ‘adnominal ending＋dus sip-’ and ‘adnominal ending＋dus ha-’ are distinguished. In the last, we concluded that the form ‘adnominal ending＋seong sip-’ is differ from ‘adnominal ending＋dus sip-/ha-’ from the view point of ‘territory of information’ and this kind of difference is a result from the functional difference between ‘seong’ and ‘dus’.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate functional differences of the grammatical collocations ‘adnominal ending＋seong sip/dus sip/dus ha-’. The first, compared to the bound noun ‘seong’, the bound noun ‘dus’ implicates not only positive dimension, but also negative dimension. Based on this difference, the grammatical collocations ‘adnominal ending＋seong sip-’ and ‘adnominal ending＋dus sip-’ can be distinguished on functional view point. Secondly, compared to ‘ha-’, ‘sip-’ has more subjective feature and it represents speaker’s strong subjective attitude. From this view point, the grammatical collocations ‘adnominal ending＋dus sip-’ and ‘adnominal ending＋dus ha-’ are distinguished. In the last, we concluded that the form ‘adnominal ending＋seong sip-’ is differ from ‘adnominal ending＋dus sip-/ha-’ from the view point of ‘territory of information’ and this kind of difference is a result from the functional difference between ‘seong’ and ‘dus’.
참고문헌 (18)
- 가미오 아키오, "続·情報のなわ張り理論" (2002), 大修館書店
- 다카치 토모나리, "현대 한국어 문법적 연어의 양태체계 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2014
- 다카치토모나리, "‘–(으)ㄹ 것이–’와 ‘–(으)ㄹ 터이–’에대한 일고찰", 언어와 정보 사회, 27, pp.87~118 (2016), 언어정보연구소
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
- 안효경, "현대국어의 의존명사 연구" (2001), 도서출판 역락
- 이기종, "{듯하다}, {듯싶다}, {성싶다}의 의미 차이", 한국언어문학, 44, pp.647~676 (2000)
- 이영경, "싶다' 구문의 史的 변천에 대한 일고찰", 한국문화, (35), pp.1~25 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
- 이주행, "한국어 의존 명사 연구" (2009), 한국문화사
- 이필영, "서술부 양태 표현의 부정 양상 -보조용언적 구성을 중심으로", 國語學, (48), pp.175~201 (2006), 국어학회
- 임근석, "문법적 연어와 문법화의 관계", 國語學, (51), pp.115~147 (2008), 국어학회
- 장경희, "한국어의 양태 범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
- 정유남, "현대 국어 추측의 양태 의미 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2006
- 정혜선, "‘싶다’ 構文의 歷史的 變化", 어문연구(語文硏究), 38(2), pp.169~191 (2010), 한국어문교육연구회
- 차현실, "‘싶다’의 의미와 통사구조", 언어, 9(2), pp.305~326 (1984)
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- 문화체육관광부, "21세기 세종계획 최종 성과물(2011.12. 수정판)", ~ (2011)
- 김별아, "꿈의 부족" (2002), 문이당
- 주요섭, "사랑 손님과 어머니(외)" (2012), 유페이퍼