관형사형 어미 ‘-는’에 대하여
Study on Adnominal Ending ‘-neun’
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is on the functional meaning and the combining restriction of ‘-neun’ under the assumption that ‘-neu-+-eun’ is fused into ‘-neun’. The functional meaning of ‘-neun’ conveys the meaning and logical oder of the events of the adnominal clause and the main clause in utterance time. ‘-neun’ is combined when the utterance time precedes or is concurrent with the event of the adnominal clause or when the events of the adnominal clause and the main clause are concurrent. The study reveals that the combining restrictions of ‘-neun’ and pre-final ending come from the persistence of the combining restriction of ‘-neu-’ and with the new functional meaning of ‘-neun’. It isn't combined with ‘-deo-’ due to the persistence. It is caused by the new functional meaning that it isn't combined with ‘-eot-, -get-.’ It can be explained by the persistence or the new functional meaning that it isn't combined with an adjective or ‘-ida.’
Abstract
This study is on the functional meaning and the combining restriction of ‘-neun’ under the assumption that ‘-neu-+-eun’ is fused into ‘-neun’. The functional meaning of ‘-neun’ conveys the meaning and logical oder of the events of the adnominal clause and the main clause in utterance time. ‘-neun’ is combined when the utterance time precedes or is concurrent with the event of the adnominal clause or when the events of the adnominal clause and the main clause are concurrent. The study reveals that the combining restrictions of ‘-neun’ and pre-final ending come from the persistence of the combining restriction of ‘-neu-’ and with the new functional meaning of ‘-neun’. It isn't combined with ‘-deo-’ due to the persistence. It is caused by the new functional meaning that it isn't combined with ‘-eot-, -get-.’ It can be explained by the persistence or the new functional meaning that it isn't combined with an adjective or ‘-ida.’
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
- 고영근, "표준국어 문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
- 권재일, "복합문 구성에서의 시상법", 한글, 182, pp.173~194 (1983)
- 김수태, "우리말 인용월 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
- 김수태, "관형사절의 ‘-더-’에 대하여", 한글, (303), pp.5~39 (2014), 한글학회
- 김수태, "관형사형 어미 ‘-을’에 대하여", 언어과학, 21(2), pp.1~24 (2014), 한국언어과학회
- 김창섭, "국어 관형절의 과거 시제", 어학, 14, pp.95~117 (1987)
- 남기심, "국어문법의 시제 문제에 관한 연구" (1978), 탑출판사
- 2009, , pp.국어학총서, 66, ~
- 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 국어학회
- 박재연, "한국어 관형사형 어미의 의미 기능과 그 문법 범주", 한국어학, 43, pp.151~177 (2009), 한국어학회
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 송진오, "The Abstract Nominalizers in Korean and Japanese", 언어, 6(2), pp.157~193 (1981)
- 안명철, "現代國語의 樣相硏究 : 認識樣相을 中心으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.1983
- 양동휘, "국어 관형사절의 시제", 한글, 162, pp.205~221 (1978)
- 양정석, "한국어 시간요소들의 형태통사론", 언어, 33(4), pp.693~722 (2008), 한국언어학회
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 이효상, "다각적 시각을 통한 국어의 시상체계 분석", 언어, 20(3), pp.207~250 (1995)
- 임동훈, "현대국어 어미 ‘느’의 범주와 변화", 國語學, (59), pp.3~44 (2010), 국어학회
- 장경희, "국어의 완형보절의 해석", 국어학, 16, pp.487~519 (1987)
- 崔東柱, "국어 시상체계의 통시적 변화에 관한 연구", 박사, 언어학, pp.1995
- 韓東完, "現代國語 時制의 體系的 硏究", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1985
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1981), 샘문화사
- 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사
- Bybee, J., "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and modality in the language of the world" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press