본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혼잣말 종결어미 ‘-구나’와 ‘-네’ 의 의미 차이 연구

A Study on the Differences in Meaning Sentence-final Endings ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne’

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to examine what causes the difference in meaning between ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’ For the examination, this study used a research method that differentiates grammar category from semantic category, and showed that grammar category should be used as a standard point for the meaning analysis of ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’ In addition, this study also used a research method that differentiate utterance situation from utterance sentence, and showed that utterance situation should be used as a standard point for the meaning analysis of ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’By using these methods, first, this study found that the sentence-final endings of ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne’ are both used when a speaker talks to himself or herself. Next, this study also found that, “whether a speaker has interest in a combined proposition” is an important criterion for differentiating between ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne. More specifically, ‘-guna’ is used when a speaker does not has an interest in a combined proposition (unbiased position), whereas ‘-ne’ is used when a speaker has an interest in a combined proposition (biased position). This study is meaningful because it provides an opportunity to reconsider the current trend of meaning analysis which uses ‘evidentiality,’ ‘inference,’ or ‘perception’ for the interpretations of the difference in meaning between ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’

Abstract

This study aims to examine what causes the difference in meaning between ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’ For the examination, this study used a research method that differentiates grammar category from semantic category, and showed that grammar category should be used as a standard point for the meaning analysis of ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’ In addition, this study also used a research method that differentiate utterance situation from utterance sentence, and showed that utterance situation should be used as a standard point for the meaning analysis of ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’By using these methods, first, this study found that the sentence-final endings of ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne’ are both used when a speaker talks to himself or herself. Next, this study also found that, “whether a speaker has interest in a combined proposition” is an important criterion for differentiating between ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne. More specifically, ‘-guna’ is used when a speaker does not has an interest in a combined proposition (unbiased position), whereas ‘-ne’ is used when a speaker has an interest in a combined proposition (biased position). This study is meaningful because it provides an opportunity to reconsider the current trend of meaning analysis which uses ‘evidentiality,’ ‘inference,’ or ‘perception’ for the interpretations of the difference in meaning between ‘-guna’ and ‘-ne.’

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 구현정, "반영적 경청에 쓰이는 ‘-구나’의 담화기능", 어문학연구, 4, pp.49~72 (1996), 상명대학교 어문학연구소
  2. 김석득, "우리말 형태론-말본론-" (1992), 탑출판사
  3. 김유정, "담화 분석을 통해 본 ‘-구나’ 용법 연구 (1) -담화 분석 범주 설정과 담화 맥락 분석 결과를 중심으로-", 한국어학, 41, pp.229~256 (2008), 한국어학회
  4. 남기심, "국어문법의 시제문제에 관한 연구" (1978), 탑출판사
  5. 문혜심, "한국어 어미 교육 연구의 변천 -학위 논문을 대상으로-", 문법 교육, 9, pp.75~104 (2008), 한국문법교육학회
  6. 박나리, "한국어 교육문법에서의 종결어미 기술에 대한 한 제안", 이중언어학, 26(26), pp.91~116 (2004), 이중언어학회
  7. 박재연, "한국어의 인식론적 범주와 관련한 몇 문제", 國語學, 66(66), pp.79~108 (2013), 국어학회
  8. 박재연, "한국어 종결어미 ‘-구나’의 의미론", 한국어 의미학, 43, pp.219~245 (2014), 한국어의미학회
  9. 서정수, "국어문법의 연구 I" (1983), 한국문화사
  10. 신선경, "‘-군(요)’와 ‘-네(요)’의 쓰임에 대한 연구: 서술 시점의 차이를 중심으로", 형태론, 3(1), pp.69~84 (2001)
  11. 이관규, "학교 문법과 한국어 문법의 성격과 내용 체계", 문법 교육, 13, pp.29~56 (2010), 한국문법교육학회
  12. 이재성, "과거 사건의 구조와 과거 사건 인식 방식", 한글, 271(271), pp.77~106 (2006), 한글학회
  13. 이재성, "시간 현상 관련 문법 범주 정립을 위한 몇 가지 개념에 대한 고찰", 한국어학, 43, pp.29~50 (2009), 한국어학회
  14. 임채훈, "‘감각적 증거’ 양태성과 한국어 어미 교육- ‘-네’, ‘-더라’, ‘-더니’, ‘-길래’ 등을 중심으로-", 이중언어학, 37(37), pp.199~234 (2008), 이중언어학회
  15. 장경희, "현대 국어의 양태 범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
  16. 정경숙, "한국어 종결어미 '-네'의 의미: 증거성 및 의외성과 관련해서", 언어, 37(4), pp.995~1016 (2012), 한국언어학회
  17. 정인아, "한국어의 증거성(Evidentiality) 범주에 관한 연구", 박사, 한국언어문화, pp.2010
  18. 최현배, "우리말본" (1980), 정음사
  19. 허 웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)