荀子“伪”概念特点之新探
The New Research into the Conceptual Characteristics of “wei(伪)” in Xunzi
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本文将对荀子“伪”概念做新的考察,主要涵盖以下四点内容: 第一,在文献上,具体举出荀子及相关文献之“伪”字的用例并加以分析,指出其所具之哲学意义,荀 子自身的目的不是绝对否定前人,而是为了把握确实的知识进行的独特尝试。 第二,荀子对“伪”之反转意识的契机,是从伪的“源流” 即心之微妙的作用中“再发现”的,亦可见荀子对 “伪”注重的不是表层上的而是有着深层的意义。 第三,本文考察了荀子“伪论”的局限,在于他认为正确的思想之来源都属于“圣人之伪”,真正“能为禹” 的只有“圣人”。他也没有明确地说明圣人之伪的外在根据。 第四,荀子对“伪”的概念下了两种定义,其间有着深层之关系,显示着“伪”之概念蕴含丰富的解释 可能。 总之,通过对荀子之“伪”概念的再考察、再审视、再定义,能够重新发现荀子“伪”概念的本义与丰富哲 学思想之内涵,这也是我们深入理解荀子思想的一个关键环节。
Abstract
This paper is the new research in four ways into the concept of “wei(伪)” in Xunzi. First, the purposes of this paper were to analyze in detail the examples of“wei”used in XunZi and in the pre-Qin literature, and to discover special characteristics and representative characters of wei in XunZi. The examples of “wei” in the pre-Qin literature before and after XunZi and the comparison analysis of “wei” appeared in the entire XunZi enable us not only to review the literature but also to find philosophical significance of Xunzi. Second, a new discovery of the most fundamental properties of “wei” through the investigation into relations with “xin(心)”: xin is the origin of wei, and Xunzi’s reversed sense of wei is rediscovered in the “origin” of wei, the subtle action of “xin”. Through this investigation, we can understand in-depth what the crucial factors are in producing and realizing “wei”. Third, an investigation into the restriction of the Xunzi’s wei theory: The Xunzi’s type of “Nature produces and man makes(天生人成)” seems harmless to the liberation of whole mankind, but all sources of the correct ideas belong to the Shengren(圣人)’s “wei”, according to the Xunzi. Therefore, those who can truly become a king Yu(禹) are only Shengren. Besides, Xunzi does not interpret and explain clearly the external basis of wei, so he encounters a problem that becoming Shengren is hard for us in fact. Fourth, this paper pays attention to that there are in the Xunzi’s idea two kinds of “wei” different in implication. As seen in Zheng-ming, the possibility of abundant interpretation of “wei” can be rediscovered through two definitions of the concept of Xun zi’s “wei”. Through this work of newly discovering the real meaning and abundant connotation of the Xunzi’s “wei”, a try to reinvestigate, reexamine and redefine the concept of the Xunzi’s “wei” could be made.
참고문헌 (63)
- "郭店楚简老子甲组", ~
- "公孙龙子", ~
- "管子", ~
- "论语", ~
- "道德经", ~
- "吕氏春秋", ~
- "孟子", ~
- "毛诗", ~
- "墨子", ~
- "文子", ~
- "史记", ~
- "尚书", ~
- "性自命出", ~
- "申子", ~
- "慎子", ~
- "礼记", ~
- "尹文子", ~
- "仪礼", ~
- "尔雅", ~
- "庄子", ~
- "周礼", ~
- "周易", ~
- "春秋繁露", ~
- "春秋左氏传", ~
- "韩非子", ~
- "孝经", ~
- 王先谦, "荀子集解" (2007), 中华书局
- 梁启雄, "荀子简释" (1983), 中华书局
- 王天海, "荀子校释" (2005), 上海古籍出版社
- 猪饲敬所, "荀子补遗", 青木嵩山堂
- 哈佛燕京学社引得, "仪礼引得" (1932), 哈佛燕京学社
- 哈佛燕京学社引得, "毛诗引得" (1934), 哈佛燕京学社
- 哈佛燕京学社引得, "孝经引得" (1950), 哈佛燕京学社
- 哈佛燕京学社引得, "荀子引得" (1988), 上海古籍出版社
- 香港中文大学中国文化研究所, "吕氏春秋逐字索引" (1994), 商务印书馆
- 香港中文大学中国文化研究所, "春秋左传逐字索引" (1995), 商务印书馆
- 香港中文大学中国文化研究所, "尹文子·公孙龙子逐字索引" (1998), 商务印书馆
- 香港中文大学中国文化研究所, "韩非子逐字索引" (2000), 商务印书馆
- 香港中文大学中国文化研究所, "申子·尸子·慎子逐字索引" (2000), 商务印书馆
- 香港中文大学中国文化研究所, "管子逐字索引" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 洪业, "礼记引得" (1983), 上海古籍出版社
- 윤무학, "荀子" (2005), 成均馆大学校出版部
- 高正, "诸子百家研究" (1997), 中国社科院出版社
- 郭沫若, "十批判书" (2008), 中国华侨出版社
- 裘锡圭, "纠正我在郭店 『老子』 简释读中一个错误——关于“绝伪弃诈”", 郭店楚简国际学术研讨会论文集 (2000), 湖北人民出版社
- 马积高, "荀子源流" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
- 牟宗三, "名家与荀子" (1994), 台湾学生书局
- 方克立, "中国哲学大辞典" (1994), 中国社会科学出版社
- 北京大学 『荀子』 注释组, "荀子新注" (1979), 中华书局
- 梁启超, "古史辨 第四册" (1933), 朴社
- 廖名春, "荀子二十讲" (2009), 华夏出版社
- 李德永, "荀子" (1959), 上海人民出版社
- 李零, "郭店楚简校读记" (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
- 王忠林, "新译荀子读本" (1977), 三民书局
- 熊公哲, "『荀子』 下" (2008), 重庆出版社
- 陈鼓应, "老子今注今释" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 陈鼓应, "庄子今注今释" (2006), 中华书局
- 郝明朝, "论荀子的“知性”之性", 文史哲, 6 (2000)
- 金谷治, "荀子の文献学的研究", 日本学士院纪要, 9(1)
- 渋谷由纪, "『荀子』 に见られる 「伪」 の观念について", 早稲田大学大学院文学研究科紀要 第1分冊, 46 (2000)
- 松尾善弘, "孔子と荀子の 「正名」 说について", 山口大学文学会志, 49 (1999)
- 儿宝六郎, "荀子の思想——自然·主宰の两天道观と性补说" (1992), 风问书房
- 倪德卫, "儒家之道" (2006), 江苏人民出版社
