能因と公任の相互認識 ―関連説話と『玄々集』の公任詠を中心に―

Abstract

Noin was a poet in the middle of the Heian era, under Fujiwarano Kinto’s rule. Those two contemporary figures might have known each other, I suspect, and therefore, I’m about to investigate how they’d thought of each other based on a relative story and Kinto’s poem from <Gengenshu>. This work will help to understand the whole of <Gengenshu>. Firstly I examined <Fukurozoshi>, a book of Japanese poem, focusing on that Noin has criticized poem. This criticism essentially seems to be under the relationship between Noin and Kinto, though, at first sight, it refers to the pros and cons of poem. Secondly I examined that Kinto has highly appreciated on poem in a story and his theoretical work presented his book <Shinsenzuino>. It seems that Noin’s poem was not suitable for Kinto’s theory, and therefore Kinto didn’t consider Noin as a great poet. Then I examined Kinto’s poem in <Gengenshu>. Six of his work are contained and this number is the third priority amongst the poets introduced in this book. This clearly reveals that Noin had highly appreciated Kinto as a poet. As a result of investigation in regards to Kinto’s work in <Gengensshu>, he didn’t utilize technique over all of six and none of his original manner reveals. He might had referred to precede examples. Noin gave credit for Kinto’s Job in this manner. However, Noin had chosen none of Kinto’s work affected Tsurayuki on a certain unkown purpose. This is worthwhile to examine as a further study, because what Noin had wanted through <Gengenshu> would be revealed from the standard he employed.