본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

能因撰『玄々集』における撰歌意識に関する一考察 – 少数撰入歌人を中心に –

A Study on the Motives for Noin’s Selection of Waka Poems in Gengenshu – Focusing on the Poets Whose Works were Selected Less than Five Times –

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

Abstract

I explore the motives for Noin’s selection of waka poems in Gengenshu in terms of (i) the poets selected and (ii) the types of expression used in the selected waka poems. I focus on the poets whose works were selected in the selected poem books less than five times after Shuishu. The main results are summarized as follows. There is a tendency that Noin selected poets with whom he has some personal relation. For instance, while Oe-no Yoshitoki was famous as a poet, his brothers and father were not, but their works were included in the poem book because Noin was in a close relationship with them. This tendency also holds of female poets. For example, the sister of Anpo, Katano-no onna, and Minase-no onna, were far from famous figures in the imperial culture, but their works were included in the first volume of Noin-Hoshi-Shu. This is indicative that their relationship with Noin (before he became a monk) led him to select their works. At the same time, Noin paid attention to works of the imperial family and the Fujiwara family, but he selected works by not only the figures on the highest position of the era such as Michinaga but also those who were not famous as poets but whose stories were often at the center of attention such as Koichijoin, Shijo-no Miya, Jokyoden-no Nyogo, Michitsuna, Michikane, and Takamatsutono- no ue. For those who were not famous as poets, Noin highly valued the works which make use of the traditional waka expressions as used in the pre-Noin poem books such as Manyoshu, Isemonogatari, and Kokinshu. Also, he focused on the works which reflect the new waka expressions which suited his taste. Gengenshu was subsequently highly thought of in Shunjei’s Koraihuteisho, and this seems to be because Noin’s selection of waka poems which sought novelty in the search for traditional expressions was recognized as a precursor of Honkadori, a waka technique which was established around the time when Koraihuteisho was published.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 安西廸夫, "玄々集の成立", 国文学言語と文芸, 6(4), pp.61~67 (1964)
  2. 犬養廉, "能因法師研究(一)―その歌人的出発まで―", 国語国文学研究, 30, pp.1~9 (1965)
  3. 犬養廉, "河原院の歌人達―安法法師を軸として―", 国語と国文学, 44(10), pp.68~78 (1967)
  4. 小沢正夫, "古今和歌集", pp.1~591 (2006), 小学館
  5. 엄교흠, "能因法師の『玄々集』における撰歌意識に 関する一考察 - 『拾遺集』との重出歌を手掛かりに -", 일어일문학연구, 97(2), pp.43~61 (2016), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
  6. 厳教欽, "能因における貫之の影響―伝統と変奏―", 第40回国際日本文学研究集会会議録, 17~36 (2016)
  7. 厳教欽, "能因の撰歌意識に関する一考察―『玄々集』所収長能詠を手掛かりに―", 比較文学比較文化論集, 35, pp.1~15 (2018)
  8. 엄교흠, "能因と公任の相互認識 ―関連説話と『玄々集』の公任詠を中心に―", 日本學硏究, 55, pp.123~142 (2018), 일본연구소
  9. 片桐洋一, "後撰和歌集", pp.1~500 (1990), 岩波書店
  10. 片桐洋一, "竹取物語 伊勢物語 大和物語 平中物語", pp.1~592 (2006), 小学館
  11. 川上新一郎, "新撰朗詠集』と三奏本『金葉集』―『玄々集』の受容について―", 和歌文学研究, 38, pp.9~14 (1978)
  12. 川村晃生, "能因法師集․玄々集とその研究", pp.1~289 (1979), 三弥井書店
  13. 川村晃生, "摂関期和歌史の研究", pp.105~128 (1991), 三弥井書店
  14. 川村晃生, "新古今集と漢文学", pp.3~22 (1992), 汲古書院
  15. 久保木哲夫, "『玄々集』定家筆本の形態+定家本『玄々集』本文", 国文学言語と文芸, 89, pp.5~27 (1980)
  16. 小島憲之, "万葉集二", pp.1~527 (2006), 小学館
  17. 小町谷輝彦, "和歌的幻像の追求─能因法師論ノ一ト─", 日本文学, 19, pp.1~14 (1970)
  18. 橘健二, "大鏡", pp.1~565 (2007), 小学館
  19. 谷山茂, "玄々集と金葉集三奏本", 国語国文, 21(9), pp.61~72 (1952)
  20. 谷山茂, "金葉集と詞花集―玄々集をめぐって―", 国語国文, 22(6), pp.31~40 (1953)
  21. 樋口芳麻呂, "平安․鎌倉時代秀歌撰の研究", pp.3~22 (1983), ひたく書房
  22. 平野由紀子, "『玄々集』本文考―現存本の限界と失われた系統―", 国語と国文学, 57(7), pp.458~488 (1980)
  23. 藤岡忠美, "袋草紙考証 雑談篇", pp.1~592 (1991), 和泉書院
  24. 山田裕, "栄花物語一", pp.1~592 (2008), 小学館
  25. 山田裕, "栄花物語二", pp.1~568 (2008), 小学館
  26. 山端善明, "古事談 続古事談", pp.1~910 (2005), 岩波書店
  27. "新編国歌大観 古典ライブラリ一アプリ版、ver.5.0.4.-0500", ~
  28. "和歌文学大事典 古典ライブラリ一アプリ版、ver.0623-1", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)