사법민주주의와 법원의 판결문
Judicial Democracy and Case Opinions of Courts
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper attempts to analyse Korean court’s case opinion in terms of its function, role, and significance in the legal system based on the assumption that the case opinion could play significant role for the enhancement of judicial democracy and the institutional development of judiciary. This paper suggests that court’s case opinion should be written in the way which allows any third party could review and verify the appropriateness of the decision. For this purpose, a case opinion must provide the legal standard as an interpretation of the applicable law which it chooses and its application to the facts of the case to show how it reaches the decision.
Abstract
This paper attempts to analyse Korean court’s case opinion in terms of its function, role, and significance in the legal system based on the assumption that the case opinion could play significant role for the enhancement of judicial democracy and the institutional development of judiciary. This paper suggests that court’s case opinion should be written in the way which allows any third party could review and verify the appropriateness of the decision. For this purpose, a case opinion must provide the legal standard as an interpretation of the applicable law which it chooses and its application to the facts of the case to show how it reaches the decision.
참고문헌 (23)
- Joyce Geroge, "Judicial Opinion Writing Handbook" (2000), William S. Hein & Co
- Richard A. Wasserstrom, "The Judicial Decision: toward a Theory of Legal Justification" (1961), Stanford University Press
- Ruggero J. Aldisert, "The Judicial Process" (2009), AuthorHouse
- William Burnham, "Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States" (2002), West Group
- 박철, "경제발전을 위한 법치주의 - 사회적 신뢰와 협조의 기초인 법과 법치주의를 중심으로 -", 저스티스, (106)통권 : 106, pp.39~79 (2008), 한국법학원
- 황도수, "근대 법치주의에 대한 이해 ― 시민 법치주의 ―", 행정법연구, (26), pp.169~198 (2010), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- Chad M. Oldfather, "Writing, Cognition, and the Nature of the Judicial Function", Georgetown Law Journal, pp.1283~1345 (2008)
- Daniel Farber, "The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents", Minnesota Law Review, pp.1173~1203 (2006)
- Earl M. Maltz, "The Function of Supreme Court Opinions", Houston Law Review, (Winter), pp.1395~1420 (2000)
- Elizabeth Ahlgren Francis, "The Elements of Ordered Opinion Writing", Judges’ Journal, (Spring), pp.8~12 (1999)
- Frederick Schauer, "Precedent", Stanford Law Review, pp.571~605 (1987)
- Frederick Schauer, "Giving Reasons", Stanford Law Review, pp.633~659 (1995)
- Frederick Schauer, "Opinions as Rules", University of Chicago Law Review, (Fall), pp.1455~1475 (1995)
- Gerald Lebovits, "Ethical Judicial Opinion Writing", Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, (Spring), pp.237~280 (2008)
- Lauren Robel, "The Practice of Precedent: Anastasoff, Noncitation Rules, and the Meaning of Precedent in an Interpretive Community", Indiana Law Review, pp.399~421 (2002)
- Michael Sinclair, "Precedent, Super-Precedent", George Mason Law Review, (Winter), pp.363~411 (2007)
- Nancy A. Wanderer, "Writing Better Opinions: Communicating with Candor, clarity, and Style", Maine Law Review, pp.47~70 (2002)
- Patricia M. Wald, "The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings", University of Chicago Law Review, (Fall), pp.1371~1419 (1995)
- Peter M. Tiersma, "The Textualization of Precedent", Notre Dame Law Review, pp.1187~1278 (2007)
- Ruggero J. Aldisert, "Opinion Writing and Opinion Readers", Cardozo Law Review, pp.1~43 (2009)
- Thomas Healy, "Stare Decisis as a Constitutional Requirement", West Virginia Law Review, (Fall), pp.43~121 (2001)
- 사법개혁추진위원회, "사법개혁을 위한 건의문, 2004. 12. 31", ~ (2004)
- 재판의 심리, 판결 및 기록공개의 헌법적 문제와 그해결방안 연구, "한국헌법학회", 대법원, ~ (2010)