판결서의 구조와 양식에 관한 비교법적 고찰
A Comparative Study on the Structure and Style of Judicial Opinions
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
A civil procedure proceeds to a final judgment. As a general rule, judgments come into existence through addressing of judicial opinions. It is needless to say that judgments come into existence orally without written judicial opinions. But, oral judgments should be filed by law clerks in order to come into effect. So, a judicial opinion occupies an very important position in civil procedure irrespective of judgment's form. The minimal requirements of judicial opinion is prescribed by statutes, and supplemented by practice of the courts in the Civil Law Tradition. In contrast, practice of the courts have developed almost all forms and contents of judicial opinions in the Common Law Tradition. The legal tradition and culture of a nation have filtered into the structure & style of its own judicial opinions. In addition, judicial opinions are the documents that judges make their own thoughts and beliefs clear about cases. Judicial opinions are the ways and means that judges communicate with society. So, the structure & style of judicial opinion is a mirror of the judge's individual character and personality. In short, a study on the structure & style of judicial opinions furnishes the method of evaluating judges' capacity as well as understanding legal tradition and culture. This article analyzes and estimates the structure & style of judicial opinions from a comparative perspective.
참고문헌 (51)
- 김광해, "우리나라 판결문의 텍스트성에 대한 연구", 텍스트언어학, 8 (2000)
- 김상영, "민사판결서의 간이화, in: 21세기 민사소송법의 전망 (하촌정동윤선생화갑기념논문집)" (1999), 법문사
- 김성진, "미국연방대법원 판결문에 대한 이해", 헌법논총, 14 (2003)
- 김영철, "독ㆍ불ㆍ미ㆍ영ㆍ일의 판결문 작성방식", 법조, 통권 : 428호 (1992)
- 박시현, "판결문의 특성", 인문학연구, 8 (2007), 원광대
- 박우동, "대법원ㆍ대법원판결, in: 민사판례연구(Ⅰ)" (1979), 박영사
- 박우동, "대법원전원합의체재판에 있어서의 의견의 표시, in: 민사법과 환경법의제문제 (송헌안이준박사 화갑기념논문집)" (1986)
- 박 철, "판결서 글쓰기에 관한 몇 가지 생각들", 민사재판의 제문제, 14 (2005)
- 안경환, "미국 연방대법원판결문에 나타난 서양고전작품", 저스티스, 27(1) (1994)
- 양창수, "민법입문, 제4판" (2004), 박영사
- 윤정옥, "판결문의 시기별 문제 연구", 석사, 교육학, pp.1997
- 이원범, "민사판결서 작성방식의 현황과 개선방향", 법률신문 2006년 3월 2일자 (제3439호), ~ (2006)
- 이재홍, "우리나라와 외국의 판결서 작성방식과 그 개선과정", 법조, 46(9) (1997)
- 정재오, "독일의 구술변론과 판결서, in: 사법개혁과 세계의 사법제도" (2006), 사법연구지원재단
- (하), "비교법(상)", pp.2005, 조규창
- 조규창, "논리와 직관 - 대법원민사판례를 중심으로 -", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 101호 (1984), 대한변호사협회
- "법원사" (1995), 법원행정처
- "민사재판실무" (2003), 사법연수원
- "새로운 판결서 작성방식" (2009), 사법연수원
- P.S. Atiyah, "Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law" (1987), Clarendon
- J. Dawson, "Dawson,The Oracles of the Law" (1968), University of Michigan Press
- W. Domnarski, "In the Opinion of the Court" (1996), University of Illinois Press
- R. Dworkin, "Taking Rights Seriously" (1977), Harvard UP
- R. Ferguson, "The Judicial Opinion as Literary Genre", Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 2 (1990)
- J. George, "Judicial Opinion Writing Handbook, 5th ed." (2007), Hein
- J. Gillis Wetter, "The Styles of Appellate Judicial Opinions" (1960), Sythoff
- J. L. Goutal, "Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Bratain and the U.S.A.", American Journal of Comparative Law, 24 (1976)
- C. Jungman, "Ein neuer “horror pleni” in den Zivilsenaten des Bundesgerichtshofs?", JZ, 64 (2009)
- D. Klinck, "“Criticising the Judges”: Some Preliminary Reflections on Style", McGill Law Journal, 31 (1986)
- F. Lawson, "Comparative Judicial Style", American Journal of Comparative Law, 25 (1977)
- R. Leflar, "Some Observations concerning Judicial Opinions", Columbia Law Review, 61 (1961)
- D. MacCormick, "Interpreting Statutes" (1991), Ashgate
- D. MacCormick, "Interpreting Precedents" (1997), Ashgate
- J. Mance, "The common law and Europe: differences of style or substance and do they matter?(The Holdsworth Address 2007)" (2007), Holdsworth Club
- B. Markesinis, "A Matter of Style", Law Quarterly Review, 110 (1994)
- B. Markesinis, "Judicial Style and Judicial Reasoning in England and Germany", Cambridge Law Journal, 59 (2000)
- R. Martin, "Criticising the Judges", McGill Law Journal, 28 (1982)
- R. Mendegris, "Le commentaire d'arrêt en droit privé. Méthodes et exemples, 7.éd." (2004), Dalloz
- P. Mimin, "Le Style des Jugements, 4e éd." (1962), Libraries techniques
- V. Palmer, "From Embrace to Banishment: A Study of Judicial Equity in France", American Journal of Comparative Law, 47 (1999)
- W. Popkin, "Evolution of the Judicial Opinion: Institutional and Individual Styles" (2007), NYU Press
- R. Posner, "Law and Literature" (1988), Harvard UP
- R. Posner, "Judge’s Writing Styles(And Do They Matter?)", University of Chicago Law Review, 62 (1995)
- L. Ray, "Judicial Personality: Rhetoric and Emotion in Supreme Court Opinions", Washington and Lee Law Review, 59 (2002)
- A. Rodger, "The Form and Language of Judicial Opinion", Law Quarterly Review, 118 (2002)
- L. Rosenberg, "Zivilprozessrecht, 16.Aufl." (2004), C.H. Beck
- B. Rudden, "Courts and Codes in England, France and Soviet Russia", Tulane Law Review, 48 (1974)
- P. Sattelmacher, "Bericht, Gutachten und Urteil, 34 Aufl." (2008), F. Vahlen
- P. Wald, "The Rhetoric of Results and the Results of Rhetoric: Judicial Writings", University of Chicago Law Review, 62 (1995)
- P. Wald, "A Reply to Judge Posner", University of Chicago Law Review, 62 (1995)
- M. Wells, "French and American Judicial Opinions", Yale Journal of International Law, 19 (1994)