朝鮮初期 世祖代 佛敎的 祥瑞의 政治的 意味
The Political Meaning of the Buddhist Omen under King Sejo’s Reign in the Early Years of Choson
1
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This work is to explain political meaning of the buddhist omen which happened at King Sejo’s reign in the early years of Choson. Contrary to general understandings, which pointed the Confucian growing in the early years of Choson, the buddhist omen based on the buddhist symbol, with forgiving and grace of the King, occurred over 40 times in the Sejosillok and other historical materials. In former studies. it was understanded as features of King Sejo. However, King Sejo cannot help choosing the buddhist symbol system at that time. There were three political problems to be solved, trouble with Neo-Confucian politics, resistance of people caused by centralizing policies, instability with Japan and North barbarians. In this time, the Buddhism was very useful. The buddhist omen was used as making King Sejo the absolute, easing people with representing King Sejo the mercy king, stressing King Sejo's aspect as Real Buddha to Japan and North barbarians. The buddhist omen occurred mainly after 8th year of King Sejo’s reign when centralizing policies were pushed powerfully. It is contrary to critical opinions of the buddhist omen before King Sejo’s reign, and King Sejo accepted the buddhist omen actively, instead of the confucian omen. The buddhist omen found on examples of successive wise kings and legends spreaded before Choson dynasty. It clarifies the meaning of the buddhist omen. King’s aspect made by the buddhist omen was reproducted. Forgiving and grace after the buddhist omen, mainly targeted people, and was especially accented after 7th year of King Sejo’s reign, when drought and disaster occurred. Also, Building Wongaksa temple at the center of the capital city, containing Buddha’s bones, was intended to make people memorize the buddhist omen. Showing amrita to envoies of Japan and North barbarians, then making them taste it, was also intended to display the buddhist omen of King Sejo. So far, we can see that the buddhist omen under King Sejo’s reign was closely related to King Sejo’s political intents. However, not like former prejudices, Sejo’s buddhist policies were limited to certain line, not contradicting the late king’s policy, confiscating lands and slaves of temples. King Sejo used the Buddhism approriately as politics.
Abstract
This work is to explain political meaning of the buddhist omen which happened at King Sejo’s reign in the early years of Choson. Contrary to general understandings, which pointed the Confucian growing in the early years of Choson, the buddhist omen based on the buddhist symbol, with forgiving and grace of the King, occurred over 40 times in the Sejosillok and other historical materials. In former studies. it was understanded as features of King Sejo. However, King Sejo cannot help choosing the buddhist symbol system at that time. There were three political problems to be solved, trouble with Neo-Confucian politics, resistance of people caused by centralizing policies, instability with Japan and North barbarians. In this time, the Buddhism was very useful. The buddhist omen was used as making King Sejo the absolute, easing people with representing King Sejo the mercy king, stressing King Sejo's aspect as Real Buddha to Japan and North barbarians. The buddhist omen occurred mainly after 8th year of King Sejo’s reign when centralizing policies were pushed powerfully. It is contrary to critical opinions of the buddhist omen before King Sejo’s reign, and King Sejo accepted the buddhist omen actively, instead of the confucian omen. The buddhist omen found on examples of successive wise kings and legends spreaded before Choson dynasty. It clarifies the meaning of the buddhist omen. King’s aspect made by the buddhist omen was reproducted. Forgiving and grace after the buddhist omen, mainly targeted people, and was especially accented after 7th year of King Sejo’s reign, when drought and disaster occurred. Also, Building Wongaksa temple at the center of the capital city, containing Buddha’s bones, was intended to make people memorize the buddhist omen. Showing amrita to envoies of Japan and North barbarians, then making them taste it, was also intended to display the buddhist omen of King Sejo. So far, we can see that the buddhist omen under King Sejo’s reign was closely related to King Sejo’s political intents. However, not like former prejudices, Sejo’s buddhist policies were limited to certain line, not contradicting the late king’s policy, confiscating lands and slaves of temples. King Sejo used the Buddhism approriately as politics.
참고문헌 (77)
- "龍門寺鐘記", ~
- "高麗史", ~
- "觀音現象記", ~
- "國朝寶鑑", ~
- "起世經", ~
- "金石萃篇", ~
- "唐六典", ~
- "大明律直解", ~
- "大方廣佛華嚴經 진본", ~
- "大佛頂如來密因修證了義諸菩薩萬行首楞嚴經諺解", ~
- 김무봉, "조선시대의 간경도감 간행의 한글 경전 연구", 한국사상과 문화, (23), pp.373~418 (2004), 한국사상문화학회
- "묘법연화경", ~
- "文宗實錄", ~
- "法苑珠林", ~
- "三國遺事", ~
- "書經", ~
- "成宗實錄", ~
- "世祖實錄", ~
- "世宗實錄", ~
- "拭疣集", ~
- "新增東國輿地勝覽", ~
- "練藜室記述", ~
- "睿宗實錄", ~
- "龍門寺記", ~
- "월인석보", ~
- "『諛聞瑣錄』(『朝鮮佛敎通史』 상편, 佛化時處에서 재인용.)", ~
- "전당문", ~
- "定宗實錄", ~
- "朝鮮佛敎通史", ~
- "『朝鮮佛敎通史』 ｢襄陽洛山寺鐘銘｣(정난종 찬)", ~
- "『朝鮮佛敎通史』 ｢華山光德寺舍利閣記銘幷序｣(한계희 찬)", ~
- "『朝鮮佛敎通史』 ｢興天寺新鑄鐘銘幷序｣(한계희 찬)", ~
- "『朝鮮寺刹史料』 ｢大圓覺寺碑銘幷序｣(김수온 찬)", ~
- "太宗實錄", ~
- 刊經都監本, "妙法蓮華經", 進經錢文
- 강제훈, "朝鮮 世祖代의 朝會와 王權", 사총, 61 (2005)
- 朝鮮初期 田稅制度 硏究, "강제훈", 고려대학교 민족문화연구원, ~ (2002)
- "국립중앙박물관 소장. 유물번호 본관12360", ~
- 권연웅, "世祖代의 佛敎政策", 진단학보, 75 (1993)
- 김범, "朝鮮前期의 王權과 政局運營:成宗·燕山君･中宗代를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2005
- 김석근, "전륜성왕(轉輪聖王), 미륵(彌勒), 그리고 메시아: 미륵신앙의 정치적 기능과 함의에 대한 시론적 접근", 동양정치사상사, 9(1), pp.5~22 (2010), 한국[DOI]
- 김종명, "한국 중세의 불교의례:사상적 배경과 역사적 의미" (2000), 문학과 지성사
- 김진무, "중국불교와 정치권력""불교와 국가권력의 갈등과 상생" (2010), 조계종출판사
- 김태영, "朝鮮初期 世祖王權의 專制性에 대한 一考察", 한국사연구, 87 (1994)
- 김택민, "당육전 해제. In 역주 당육전" (2003), 신서원
- 대한불교 조계종 교육원, "曹溪宗史 : 고중세편" (2004), 조계종출판사
- 도현철, "고려말 사대부의 일본 인식과 문화 교류", 한국사상사학, 32, pp.191~221 (2009), 한국사상사학회
- 박성지, "불교적 感應의 담론 형성에 관하여-힘의 역학관계를 중심으로-", 구비문학연구, (21), pp.459~486 (2005), 한국구비문학회
- 손승철, "朝鮮時代 對日關係史硏究", pp.55~89 (1994), 지성의 샘
- 송위지, "남방 불교지역과 북방 불교지역간의 왕권과 승단의 위상 비교", 외대사학, 8 (1998)
- 오항녕, "세조대 ‘친강’의 역사적 성격 in 朝鮮의 政治와 社會 : 최승희교수 정년 기념 논총" (2002), 집문당
- 와타나베 쇼오코, "불타 석가모니" (1981), 지식사업사
- 유정엽, "조선 초기 주역중심의 유불대론 연구", 韓國禪學(한국선학), 23, pp.489~520 (2009), 한국선학회
- 윤세원, "전륜성왕의 개념형성과 수용과정에 관한 연구", 동양사회사상, (17), pp.173~202 (2008), 동양사회사상학회
- 이병희, "朝鮮前期 圓覺寺의 造營과 運營", 문화사학, (34), pp.111~145 (2010), 한국문화사학회
- 이정주, "世祖代 後半期의 佛敎的 祥瑞와 恩典", 민족문화연구, 44, pp.237~269 (2006), 민족문화연구원
- 이태진, "朝鮮王朝의 儒敎政治와 王權", 한국사론, 23 (1990)
- 이현지, "세조 어제시 연구", 韓國古典硏究, 22, pp.319~356 (2010), 한국고전연구학회
- 정다함, "‘事大’와 ‘交隣’과 ‘小中華’라는 틀의 초시간적인 그리고 초공간적인 맥락", 韓國史學報, 42, pp.287~323 (2011), 고려사학회
- 鄭 多 函, "朝鮮初期 野人과 對馬島에 대한 藩籬 · 藩屛 認識의 형성과 敬差官의 파견", 동방학지, 141, pp.221~266 (2008), 국학연구원
- 鄭道傳, "書佛氏雜辯後", ~
- 정두희, "臺諫의 活動을 통해 본 世祖代의 王權과 儒敎理念의 對立", 역사학보, 130 (1991)
- 정두희, "세조 성종대 공신집단의 정치적 성격. In 조선초기 정치지배세력 연구" (1983), 일조각
- 전상인, "국가처럼 보기" (2010), 에코리브르
- 최승희, "세조대 왕위의 취약성과 왕권강화책. In 조선초기 정치사연구" (2002), 일조각
- 최승희, "世祖代 王位의 脆弱性과 王權强化策. In 朝鮮初期 政治史硏究" (2002), 일조각
- 최승희, "弘文館의 成立經緯", 한국사연구, 5 (1970)
- 최항, "觀音現相記", ~
- 하워드 J. 웨슬러, "비단같고 주옥같은 정치" (2005), 고즈윈
- 한상설, "朝鮮初期 世宗, 世祖의 佛敎信仰과 神權 牽制", 석사, pp.1981
- 한영우, "世祖의 民本政治와 부국강병책", 한국사, 9 (1984), 국사편찬위원회
- 한영우, "王權의 成立과 制度의 完成", 한국사, 9 (1984), 국사편찬위원회
- 한우근, "文宗-世祖朝에 있어서의 對佛敎施策. In 儒敎政治와 佛敎 : 麗末鮮初의 對佛敎施策" (1993), 일조각
- 한형주, "朝鮮初期 國家祭禮 硏究", 박사, pp.2000
- 허흥식, "高麗佛敎史硏究" (1986), 일조각
- K.S.케네쓰 첸, "중국불교" (1991), 민족사
- Pankaj Mohan, "6세기 신라에서의 아소카상징(Asokan Symbolism)의 수용과 그 의의", 한국사상사학, 23(23), pp.195~222 (2004), 한국사상사학회