본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The official state ideology of the Joseon dynasty (1392-1910) was Confucianism. But many Joseon kings who held convictions about Confucian values as precepts for state management also held personal Buddhist beliefs. The Joseon kings’ Buddhist beliefs and practices were strongly criticized by the Confucian scholar-officials as undesirable behaviors for leaders of a Confucian state. Despite of these criticisms, the Joseon kings did not give up their Buddhist beliefs. My paper consists of three parts. First, I explain the Joseon kings’ theoretical defense of Buddhism and the cases of Joseon kings’ personal Buddhist beliefs and practices. Second, I focus on the sources of the Joseon kings’ political authority and Buddhism as a source of legitimacy. Third, I explain the flexible and realistic policies on Buddhism, the Kings’ amicable response to Buddhism, and the efficiency of kingship through the political use of Buddhism. Confucianism was regarded as the only source of a king’s political authority in a Confucian state. But the fact that many Joseon people believed in Buddhism could not be ignored. Buddhism also could be a useful element to increase the people’s religious and political ties to kings who believed in Buddhism. I think that the Joseon kings knew this fact and used it politically. Confucianism was the dominant element of the kings’ political authority and the sources of the legitimacy of Joseon Dynasty. But the kings’ Buddhist beliefs and amicable policies to Buddhism have political significance in that they contributed to the formation of people’ s friendly feelings toward the kings and the integration of national unity.

Abstract

The official state ideology of the Joseon dynasty (1392-1910) was Confucianism. But many Joseon kings who held convictions about Confucian values as precepts for state management also held personal Buddhist beliefs. The Joseon kings’ Buddhist beliefs and practices were strongly criticized by the Confucian scholar-officials as undesirable behaviors for leaders of a Confucian state. Despite of these criticisms, the Joseon kings did not give up their Buddhist beliefs. My paper consists of three parts. First, I explain the Joseon kings’ theoretical defense of Buddhism and the cases of Joseon kings’ personal Buddhist beliefs and practices. Second, I focus on the sources of the Joseon kings’ political authority and Buddhism as a source of legitimacy. Third, I explain the flexible and realistic policies on Buddhism, the Kings’ amicable response to Buddhism, and the efficiency of kingship through the political use of Buddhism. Confucianism was regarded as the only source of a king’s political authority in a Confucian state. But the fact that many Joseon people believed in Buddhism could not be ignored. Buddhism also could be a useful element to increase the people’s religious and political ties to kings who believed in Buddhism. I think that the Joseon kings knew this fact and used it politically. Confucianism was the dominant element of the kings’ political authority and the sources of the legitimacy of Joseon Dynasty. But the kings’ Buddhist beliefs and amicable policies to Buddhism have political significance in that they contributed to the formation of people’ s friendly feelings toward the kings and the integration of national unity.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Buswell, Robert E., "Buddhism under Confucian Domination: The Synthetic Vision of Sosŏn Hyujŏng. In Culture and the State in Late Chosŏn Korea" (1999), Harvard University Press
  2. "Culture/tourism"[URL]
  3. Duncan, John B., "The Origins of the Chosŏn Dynasty" (1999), University of Washington Press
  4. Geum, Jang-tae, "Yugyoui jonggyoseonggwa yugyo: Cheongjugyoui gyolyu (The Religiosity of Confucianism and the Interchange between Confucianism and Catholicism)", Jonggyowa munhwa, 9, pp.1~37 (2003)
  5. Gkwak, Je-u, "Hankuk Munjip Chong-gan", 58
  6. Hanguk bulgyo jeonseo, "Complete Works of Korean Buddhism 韓國佛敎全書" (1979), Dongkuk University Press
  7. Hanguk Munjip, "韓國文集叢刊 (Collections of the Pre-modern Korean Scholars’ Writings)" (2004), Institute for the Translation of Korean Classics Press
  8. Heo Mok, "Hanguk Munjip Chong-gan", 99
  9. Jeong, Do-Jeon, "The Miscellaneous Excuses of Buddhism. Sambong Jip 三峯集" (1961), National Institute of Korean History re-published edition
  10. "Joseon wangjo sillok"[URL]
  11. Kalton, Michael, "The Writings of Kwon Kun: The Context and Shape of Early Yi Dynasty Neo-Confucianism", pp.89~123 (1985), Columbia University Press
  12. 김종명, "세종의 불교관과 유교 정치", 불교학연구, 25, pp.239~282 (2010), 불교학연구회
  13. Kim, Sang-Hyun, "Munjeongwanghuui bulgyo jungheungjeongcheak (Buddhist Restoration Polices of the Queen Mungjeong)", Hanguk bulgyohak (The Journal of Korean Association for Buddhist Studies), 56, pp.25~52 (2010)
  14. Kim, Su-on, "Hankuk Munjip Chong-gan"
  15. 고혜령, "牧隱集을 통해 본 李穡의 불교와의 관계", 진단학보, 102(102), pp.351~386 (2006), 진단학회
  16. Nam, Hee Suk, "Joseonhugi wangsilui bulgyosinanggwa bulseoganhaeng (The Buddhist Beliefs of the Royal Family and the Publications of Buddhist Scriptures in Late Joseon)", Guksagwan nonchong, 99, pp.47~78 (2002)
  17. 부남철, "Buddhism and Confucianism in King Sejong’s State Administration: Tension and Unity between Religion and Politics", The Review of Korean Studies, 8(3), pp.25~46 (2005), 한국학중앙연구원
  18. Pu, Nam Chul, "Yugyojeok hakjagunju jeongjoui jonggyojeongchaek (Confucian Scholar-king Jeongjo (r.1776-1800): His policy on religion)", Hanguk jeongchi hakhoebo (Korean Political Science Review), 37(2), pp.47~65 (2003)
  19. Sim, Jae-ryong, "Korean Buddhism: Tradition and Transformation" (1999), Jimoondang
  20. Yi, Hang-ro, "Hankuk Munjip Chong-gan", 304
  21. Yi, Sang-baek, "Hanguk munhwasa nongo" (1984), Eulyu munwhasa
  22. 유병래, "朝鮮朝 昭格殿의 연원과 터에 관한 고찰", 한국사상과 문화, 32(32), pp.127~173 (2006), 한국사상문화학회
  23. Yu, Seong-Ryeong, "Hankuk Munjip Chong Gan", 52

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)