본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국주재 러시아 총영사 플란손의 착임과정에서 제기된 인가장 부여 문제에 관한 연구

A Study on Planson’s Arrival at His Post as The Consul-General in Seoul and Matter of Granting Exequatur

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

George de Planson was the Russian Consul-General in Seoul from 1906 to 1908 year. The name of the Korean Emperor was written on Plason's patent. It means. that Russia has not recognized the right of Japan to a protectorate over Korea. Therefore, Japan could not accept such diplomatic action Russia. Japan used the occasion to resolve a question of Japanese right for protectorate over Korea. After the Russo-japanese war in 1904-1905 Portsmouth peace treaty was concluded between Russia and Japan. Russia believe that independence of Korea is not ignored by this treaty. And also believe the treaties, which signed in 1884 and 1888 years between Russia and Korea, still have the force. Therefore, by the insistence of russian government, the Russian Consul-General in Seoul would have to get his exequatur from the Foreign Office of korean government in Seoul. Japan could not accept that russian argument. Russo-japanese diplomatic war over Korea began. Especially, marquis Ito thought that Russia deliberately ignores the rights of Japan in Korea. And he did not want, that this case become a precedent for non-recognition of Japan's right to protection on Korea. But this problem has been solved surprisingly. The new minister of foreign affairs of Russia, Izbolskii has pursued pro-English policy and on the extension of this policy he also pursued pro-Japan policy. He accepted all requests from Japan. So He agreed with issue of new patent for Planson and receipt of Plason’s exequatur from Japanese Government. However, the question of treaties between Korea and Russia had no resolution. Therefore, Japan had to sign another two new treaties with Russia in 1907 and 1910 year.

Abstract

George de Planson was the Russian Consul-General in Seoul from 1906 to 1908 year. The name of the Korean Emperor was written on Plason's patent. It means. that Russia has not recognized the right of Japan to a protectorate over Korea. Therefore, Japan could not accept such diplomatic action Russia. Japan used the occasion to resolve a question of Japanese right for protectorate over Korea. After the Russo-japanese war in 1904-1905 Portsmouth peace treaty was concluded between Russia and Japan. Russia believe that independence of Korea is not ignored by this treaty. And also believe the treaties, which signed in 1884 and 1888 years between Russia and Korea, still have the force. Therefore, by the insistence of russian government, the Russian Consul-General in Seoul would have to get his exequatur from the Foreign Office of korean government in Seoul. Japan could not accept that russian argument. Russo-japanese diplomatic war over Korea began. Especially, marquis Ito thought that Russia deliberately ignores the rights of Japan in Korea. And he did not want, that this case become a precedent for non-recognition of Japan's right to protection on Korea. But this problem has been solved surprisingly. The new minister of foreign affairs of Russia, Izbolskii has pursued pro-English policy and on the extension of this policy he also pursued pro-Japan policy. He accepted all requests from Japan. So He agreed with issue of new patent for Planson and receipt of Plason’s exequatur from Japanese Government. However, the question of treaties between Korea and Russia had no resolution. Therefore, Japan had to sign another two new treaties with Russia in 1907 and 1910 year.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 박환, "대륙으로 간 혁명가들" (2003), 국학자료원
  2. 송금영, "러시아의 동북아 진출과 한반도 정책" (2004), 국학자료원
  3. 外務省, "日本外交文書", 第三十九卷 第二冊
  4. 최문형, "국제관계로 본 러일전쟁과 일본의 한국병합" (2004), 지식산업사
  5. 최문형, "러시아의 남하와 일본의 한국침략" (2007), 지식산업사
  6. А. В. Маринов, "Внешняя политика России перед первой мировой войны, М", pp.45~ (1974)
  7. "АВПРИ, ф.143, оп.491, д.83, л.24", ~
  8. "АВПРИ, ф.150, оп.493, д.214, лл.27-52об", ~
  9. "АВПРИ, ф.150, оп.493, д.63, лл.8-10об", ~
  10. "АВПРИ, ф.150, оп.493, д.64", ~
  11. "Б. А. Романов, Россия в Маньчжурии, Л", ~ (1928)
  12. "Б. Д. Пак, Россия и Корея, М", ~ (2004)
  13. "Б. Д. Пак, Там же, М.", 385~386 (2004)
  14. "Б. Д. Пак, там же", 377~
  15. "Б. Д. Пак, Там же", 387~
  16. "Б. Д. Пак, там же", 380~381
  17. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1, ед. хр.214, 215, 216", ~
  18. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1, ед. хр.214, лл.13-13об", ~
  19. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1, ед.хр.214, лл.14-16об", ~
  20. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед. хр.149, л.2", ~
  21. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед. хр.149, лл.1-1об", ~
  22. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед. хр.149, лл.2об-3", ~
  23. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.11.(5월 29일 발송)", ~
  24. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.12.(6월 3일 발송)", ~
  25. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.22.(7월 10일 발송)", ~
  26. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.4", ~
  27. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.5", ~
  28. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.5об", ~
  29. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, л.8.(5월 29일 발송)", ~
  30. "ГАРФ, ф.818, оп.1. ед.хр.153, лл.9-9об.(5월 29일 발송)", ~
  31. "Дипломаитческий словарь, Т. 2, с.496", ~
  32. Он же, "Очерки Дипломатической Истории Русско-японской Войны", pp.1895~1907 (1947)
  33. "Там же, лл.3об-4", ~
  34. "Там же, лл.4об-5об", ~
  35. "Там же, лл.6-8", ~
  36. "Там же, лл.8-8об", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)