How do Korean speakers receive internally headed relative clauses?
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines how Korean internally headed relative clauses (IHRCs) are received by native speakers. Although previous studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of IHRCs by proposing a theoretical framework with which to explain their constraints, no attempt has been made to provide an empirical study of how Korean speakers understand IHRCs with support from appropriate statistical methods. Accordingly, the current study conducted a Likert-scale task experiment and a question-and-answer survey whose results were thoroughly analyzed with multiple statistical tools. The findings are as follows. First, certain examples that have specific grammatical and aspectual features are judged as having higher acceptability. Based on this observation, we propose the possibility that the Korean IHRC is an example of a verb-class-specific construction in which innovative use spreads through semantic similarity. Second, Korean IHRCs are received in three different ways by native speakers: One group of speakers accepts the IHRCs with entity construal, another group with event construal, and a third group of speakers does not accept the IHRCs at all. It is argued that these split interpretations can be understood by observing constructions that are structurally similar to IHRCs. This study contributes to relevant areas by providing an empirical study of Korean IHRCs.
Abstract
This study examines how Korean internally headed relative clauses (IHRCs) are received by native speakers. Although previous studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of IHRCs by proposing a theoretical framework with which to explain their constraints, no attempt has been made to provide an empirical study of how Korean speakers understand IHRCs with support from appropriate statistical methods. Accordingly, the current study conducted a Likert-scale task experiment and a question-and-answer survey whose results were thoroughly analyzed with multiple statistical tools. The findings are as follows. First, certain examples that have specific grammatical and aspectual features are judged as having higher acceptability. Based on this observation, we propose the possibility that the Korean IHRC is an example of a verb-class-specific construction in which innovative use spreads through semantic similarity. Second, Korean IHRCs are received in three different ways by native speakers: One group of speakers accepts the IHRCs with entity construal, another group with event construal, and a third group of speakers does not accept the IHRCs at all. It is argued that these split interpretations can be understood by observing constructions that are structurally similar to IHRCs. This study contributes to relevant areas by providing an empirical study of Korean IHRCs.
참고문헌 (57)
- Bates, Douglas, "Parsimonious mixed models", arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967, ~ (2015)
- Boas, Hans C., "A constructional approach to resultatives" (2003), CSLI Publications
- Cha, Jong-Yul, "Constraints on clausal noun phrases in Korean with the focus on the gapless relative clause construction", PhD, pp.2005
- 조수근, "한국어 내핵 관계절의 용인성에 대한 연구", 언어학, 22(2), pp.183~198 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 조수근, "구어 말뭉치 분석을 통한 한국어 내핵관계절 연구", 언어정보, (23), pp.77~94 (2016), 언어정보연구소
- Chung, Chan, "Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause constructions", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp.68~87 (2003), Michigan State University
- Chung, Daeho, "A complement analysis of the head internal relative clauses", Language and Information, 3(2), pp.1~12 (1999)
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "On double-headed relative clauses", Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, 6(1), pp.67~91 (2011)
- Croft, William, "Typology and universals" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Croft, William, "Verbs: Aspect and causal structure" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Culy, Christopher D., "The syntax and semantics of internally headed relative clauses", PhD, pp.1990
- Dixon, Robert M. W., "Basic linguistic theory 2: Grammatical topics" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Gisborne, Nikolas, "The event structure of perception verbs" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), Chicago University Press
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Goldberg, Adele E., "Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions" (2019), Princeton University Press
- Grosu, Alexander, "A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21(2), pp.159~196 (2012)
- Grosu, Alexander, "Japanese internally-headed and doubly-headed relative constructions, and a comparison of two approaches", Glossa, 4(1), pp.1~23 (2019)
- Hiraiwa, Ken, "The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax", pp.1~32 (2017), John Wiley & Sons
- Hock, Hans H., "Principles of historical linguistics" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
- Jhang, Sae-Eun, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics", pp.269~280 (1991), Hanshin Publishing
- Jhang, Sae-Eun, "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives", PhD, pp.1994
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "The syntactic structures of Korean" (2016), Cambridge University Press
- 김경민, "Distributional Asymmetry in Subject and Object Internally headed Relative clauses in Korean", 한국어학, 94, pp.57~86 (2022), 한국어학회[DOI]
- Kim, Min-Joo, "Event-structure and the internally-headed relative clause construction in Korean and Japanese", PhD, pp.2004
- Kim, Min-Joo, "Formal linking in internally headed relatives", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.279~315 (2007)
- Kim, Min-Joo, "Internally headed relatives parallel direct perception complements", Japanese, 2008, pp.13, 281~292
- Kim, Min-Joo, "Relevance of grammar and pragmatics to the relevancy condition", Language Research, 44(1), pp.95~120 (2008)
- Kim, Min-Joo, "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27(2), pp.345~377 (2009)
- Kim, Yong-Beom, "Internally headed relative clause constructions in Korean", Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp.403~413 (1996), Kyung Hee University
- Kim, Yong-Beom, "Relevancy in internally headed relative clauses in Korean", Lingua, 112(7), pp.541~559 (2002)
- 김용하, "한국어의 내핵 관계절에 대한 소고", 현대문법연구, (75), pp.83~99 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- Kitagawa, Chisato, "Internally-headed and doubly-headed relatives in Japanese - How are they related to each other?", Glossa, 7(1), pp.1~22 (2022)
- Kuroda, Shige-Yuki, "Headless relative clauses in modern Japanese and the relevancy condition", Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.269~279 (1976), University of California
- Lee, Jeongrae, "The Korean internally headed relative clause construction: Its morphological, syntactic and semantic aspects", PhD, pp.2006
- Lee, Ji-Eun, "Relativization in Korean: Formal restriction and functional solutions", PhD, pp.2017
- 이지은, "‘-은 것이’와 ‘-은 것을’로 표시된 내핵관계절 및 유사 구성 연구", 國語學, (95), pp.167~210 (2020), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이지은, "내핵관계절의 형성 제약 및 부사절로의 의미 확장 연구", 어학연구, 57(1), pp.51~85 (2021), 언어교육원
- Lee, Ji-Eun, "Korean internally headed relative clauses: Encoding strategy and semantic relevance", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 41(1), pp.1~32 (2021)
- 문숙영, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 관계절의 몇 문제", 개신어문연구, (35), pp.31~68 (2012), 개신어문학회[DOI]
- 문숙영, "유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 ‘것’ 명사절", 國語學, (84), pp.33~88 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
- Park, Chongwon, "Korean relative clauses: Metonymy, zone activation, and reference point", Studia Linguistica, 76(2), pp.275~314 (2021)
- Park, Chongwon, "Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction", Linguistics Vanguard, 8(1), pp.355~365 (2022)
- 박형진, "한국어의 일명 내핵관계절 구성의 통사와 의미", 반교어문연구, (52), pp.87~118 (2019), 반교어문학회
- 박진호, "언어에서의 전염 현상", 언어, 40(4), pp.619~632 (2015), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Perek, Florent, "Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives" (2015), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- R Development Core Team, "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2019), R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Robenalt, Clarice, "Nonnative speakers do not take competing alternative expressions into account the way native speakers do", Language Learning, 66(1), pp.60~93 (2016)
- Shibatani, Masayoshi, "Handbook of Japanese syntax", pp.271~332 (2017), Walter de Gruyter
- Shibatani, Masayoshi, "Handbook of Japanese Contrastive Linguistics", pp.345~410 (2018), De Gruyter Mouton
- 송상헌, "Different Types of Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Korean: A Corpus-based Analysis", 언어학 연구, (60), pp.89~114 (2021), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
- Sprouse, Jon, "A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001-2010", Lingua, 134, pp.219~248 (2013)
- Verspoor, Marjolijn, "Complementation: Cognitive and functional Perspectives 1", pp.199~225 (2000), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- de Vries, Lourens, "Forms and functions in Kombai, an Awyu language of Irian Jaya" (1993), Australian National University
- Weskott, Thomas, "On the informativity of different measures of linguistic acceptability", Language, 87(2), pp.249~273 (2011)
- 염재일, "Gapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretations", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.597~627 (2015), 언어교육원
- 연재훈, "보문절, 내핵관계절, 분열문에 나타나는 '것'의 통사의미론", 언어학, (90), pp.129~154 (2021), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]