What Restricts or Boosts the Use of Internally-Headed Relative Clauses in Korean

키워드

참고문헌 (64)

1. Baddeley, A. D., "The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval?", Memory & Cognition, 21(2), pp.146~155 (1993)
2. Bock, J. K., "Syntactic persistence in language production", Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), pp.355~387 (1986)
3. Bock, K., "Framing sentences", Cognition, 35(1), pp.1~39 (1990)
4. Boyd, J. K., "Learning what not to say: The role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production", Language, 87(1), pp.55~83 (2011)
5. Cha, J.-Y, "Constraints on clausal noun phrases in Korean with the focus on the gapless relative clause construction", doctor, pp.2005
6. Chang, F., "Becoming syntactic", Psychological Review, 113(2), pp.234~272 (2006)
7. 조수근, "한국어 내핵 관계절의 용인성에 대한 연구", 언어학, 22(2), pp.183~198 (2014), 대한언어학회[DOI]
8. 조수근, "구어 말뭉치 분석을 통한 한국어 내핵관계절 연구", 언어정보, (23), pp.77~94 (2016), 언어정보연구소
9. Chung, C., "Differences between externally and internally headed relative clause constructions", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp.3~25 (2003), CSLI Publications
10. Chung, D. -H., "A complement analysis of the head internal relative clauses", Language and Information, 3(2), pp.1~12 (1999)
11. Clark, E. V, "Mechanisms of Language Acquisition", pp.1~33 (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
12. Croft, W, "Radical construction grammar" (2001), Oxford University Press
13. Dixon, R. M. W, "Basic linguistic theory 2: Grammatical topics" (2010), Oxford University Press
14. Foraker, S., "Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one", Cognitive Science, 33(2), pp.287~300 (2009)
15. Forster, K. I., "The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time", Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), pp.163~171 (2009)
16. Temporal interpretation of internally headed relative clauses in Japanese, "Fuji, M.", Rutgers University, 75~91 (1998)
17. Goldberg, A. E, "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), Chicago University Press
18. Goldberg, A. E, "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" (2006), Oxford University Press
19. Goldberg, A. E, "Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions" (2019), Princeton University Press
20. Goldwater, M. B., "Structural priming as structure‐apping: Children use analogies from previous utterances to guide sentence production", Cognitive Science, 35(1), pp.156~170 (2011)
21. Grosu, A., "A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21(2), pp.159~196 (2012)
22. Hare, M. L., "Structural priming: Purely syntactic?", Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp.208~211 (1999)
23. Horie, K., "Internally headed relative clauses in Korean and Japanese: where do the differences come from?", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 5, pp.449~458 (1993)
24. Horie, K, "Nominalization in Asian Languages", pp.473~496 (2011), John Benjamins Publishing Company
25. Jhang, S.-E, "Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives", doctor, pp.1994
26. 조미정, "The Correlation Between Syntactic Nominalization and the Internally Headed Relative Constructions in Korean", 생성문법연구, 13(4), pp.535~ (2003), 한국생성문법학회
27. Jung, Y.-S, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics", pp.235~248 (1995), Hanshin Publishing
28. Kim, J.-B, "The syntactic structures of Korean" (2016), Cambridge University Press
29. 김경민, "Distributional Asymmetry in Subject and Object Internally headed Relative clauses in Korean", 한국어학, 94, pp.57~86 (2022), 한국어학회[DOI]
30. Kim, M.-J, "Event-Structure and the Internally-Headed Relative Clause Construction in Korean and Japanese", doctor, pp.2004
31. Kim, M. -J., "Formal linking in internally headed relatives", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.279~315 (2007)
32. Korean Linguistics, "Japanese", pp.2008, Kim, M.-J
33. 김민주, "Relevance of Grammar and Pragmaticsto the Relevancy Condition", 어학연구, 44(1), pp.95~120 (2008), 언어교육원
34. Kim, M. -J., "E-type anaphora and three types of kes-construction in Korean", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27(2), pp.345~377 (2009)
35. Kim, N.-K, "The grammar of Korean complementation" (1984), University of Hawaii at Manoa Center for Korean Studies
36. Kim, R., "Why do nonnative English learners perform L2 statistical preemption less than native counterparts? The role of different repertoires for L1 and L2 constructions", Poster session at the 42nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (2017)
37. Kim, Y. -B., "Relevancy in internally headed relative clauses in Korean", Lingua, 112(7), pp.541~559 (2002)
38. 김용하, "한국어의 내핵 관계절에 대한 소고", 현대문법연구, (75), pp.83~99 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
39. Kitagawa, C., "Typological variations of head-internal relatives in Japanese", Lingua, 115, pp.1243~1276 (2005)
40. Kuroda, S.-Y, "Headless relative clauses in modern Japanese and the relevancy condition", Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.269~279 (1976), University of California
41. A study of evidentiality and polysemic features from nominalizer + particle Constructions, "Lee, J.-E", NRF KRM, ~ (2018)
42. 이지은, "‘-은 것이’와 ‘-은 것을’로 표시된 내핵관계절 및 유사 구성 연구", 國語學, (95), pp.167~210 (2020), 국어학회[DOI]
43. 이지은, "내핵관계절의 형성 제약 및 부사절로의 의미 확장 연구", 어학연구, 57(1), pp.51~85 (2021), 언어교육원
44. Lee, J. -E., "Korean internally headed relative clauses: Encoding strategy and semantic relevance", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 41(1), pp.1~32 (2021)
45. Lee, J.-R, "The Korean internally headed relative clause construction: Its morphological, syntactic and semantic aspects", doctor, pp.2006
46. 이주원, "Revisiting the persuade-constructions in Korean with empirical evidence", 언어연구, 37(1), pp.29~70 (2020), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
47. Marcotte, J, "Causative alternation errors in child language acquisition", Doctor, pp.2005
48. 문숙영, "유형론적 관점에서 본 한국어 관계절의 몇 문제", 개신어문연구, (35), pp.31~68 (2012), 개신어문학회[DOI]
49. 문숙영, "유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어의 ‘것’ 명사절", 國語學, (84), pp.33~88 (2017), 국어학회[DOI]
50. Park, C. -W., "Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction", Linguistics Vanguard, 8(1), pp.355~365 (2022)[DOI]
51. Park, C. -W., "Korean relative clauses: Metonymy, zone activation, and reference point", Studia Linguistica, 76(2), pp.275~314 (2022)
52. 박형진, "한국어의 일명 내핵관계절 구성의 통사와 의미", 반교어문연구, (52), pp.87~118 (2019), 반교어문학회
53. Ramscar, M., "The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule", Cognitive Psychology, 45(1), pp.45~94 (2002)
54. Ransom, E. N., "The grammaticalization of complementizers", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 4, pp.364~374 (1988)
55. Robenalt, C., "Judgement evidence for statistical preemption: It is relatively better to vanishthan to disappear a rabbit, but a lifeguard can equally well backstroke or swim children to shore", Cognitive Linguistics, 26(3), pp.467~503 (2015)
56. Robenalt, C., "Nonnative speakers do not take competing alternative expressions into account the way native speakers do", Language Learning, 66(1), pp.60~93 (2016)
57. 류병래, "한국어 내핵 관계절의 존재에 대한 증거와 비증거", 언어와 정보, 26(2), pp.1~25 (2022), 한국언어정보학회
58. Shimoyama, J., "Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, pp.147~182 (1999)
59. Shimoyama, J, "Wh-constructions in Japanese", doctor, pp.2002
60. Song, J. J, "Linguistic typology: Morphology and syntax" (2001), Pearson
61. 송상헌, "Different Types of Internally Headed Relative Clauses in Korean: A Corpus-based Analysis", 언어학 연구, (60), pp.89~114 (2021), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
62. Ungerer, T., "Using structural priming to test links between constructions: English caused-motion and resultative sentences inhibit each other", Cognitive Linguistics, 32(3), pp.389~420 (2021)
63. 염재일, "Gapless Adnominal Clauses in Korean and their Interpretations", 어학연구, 51(3), pp.597~627 (2015), 언어교육원
64. 연재훈, "보문절, 내핵관계절, 분열문에 나타나는 '것'의 통사의미론", 언어학, (90), pp.129~154 (2021), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천