동심의 흐름과 변화 양상 연구: 이탁오ㆍ방정환ㆍ계급주의를 중심으로

Abstract

In this article, I looked at the trend and changing pattern of traditional and modern childish innocence. Lee Tak-o saw childish innocence as a sincere, true mind. Childish innocence of Lee Tak-o was philosophical and figurative unlike that of modern times. This was because children were not recognized in the modern sense at the time. Bang Jeong-hwan's childish innocence is similar to Lee Tak-o's in that he focused on the prototype of the human mind. However, he understood not the true heart but the clean beauty as childish innocence. This came from the appearance and nature of real children. Furthermore, he emphasized the need to 'protect' this clean beauty. This is because the knowledge of modernly 'discovered' children has influenced him. He also emphasized the presence of class in childish innocence of writers of classist children's literature. His point is that children's parents are all belonging to any class, so childish innocence of children's mind also reveals class consciousness. Childish innocence of proletarian children who are aware of the absurd reality and seek to confront the bourgeois tyranny is similar to a sense of justice. Through childish innocence of proletarian children's literature including Lee Tak-o and Bang Jeong-hwan, and the changing pattern, it was found that the prototype of the human mind can be combined with the knowledge of the children of that age to form various 'childish innocence '. And here is why the study on 'childish innocence' should continue. Childish innocence is still the most valid signified to describe the signifier, children.