‘역사전쟁’에서 ‘역사외교’로 - ‘동북공정’에 대한 한국인의 대응양상 -
From ‘History War’ to ‘History Diplomacy’ - Korean Correspondence for ‘Northeast Asia Project’ -
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to examine Korean correspondence for the history dispute between Korea and China. The Korean correspondence was sorted in three times. That is, 1) from July 2003 to June 2004, 2) from July 2004 to August 2006, 3) before and after September 2006. When China distorted the history of Goguryeo, the Korean strongly criticized it in the first time. Because the mass media made an issue of history distortion. A history dispute between Korea and China spread greatly in the second time. Though a verbal mutual understanding made ends meet between the two countries, but that was not able to block the diffusion of the history dispute. While a history dispute spread, the Korean looked at China in the object of the menace. Strain between the two countries rose in the third time, but the correspondence plan was groped for a middle long term, too. That is, Korean correspondence was changing from "History War" to "History Diplomacy".
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine Korean correspondence for the history dispute between Korea and China. The Korean correspondence was sorted in three times. That is, 1) from July 2003 to June 2004, 2) from July 2004 to August 2006, 3) before and after September 2006. When China distorted the history of Goguryeo, the Korean strongly criticized it in the first time. Because the mass media made an issue of history distortion. A history dispute between Korea and China spread greatly in the second time. Though a verbal mutual understanding made ends meet between the two countries, but that was not able to block the diffusion of the history dispute. While a history dispute spread, the Korean looked at China in the object of the menace. Strain between the two countries rose in the third time, but the correspondence plan was groped for a middle long term, too. That is, Korean correspondence was changing from "History War" to "History Diplomacy".
참고문헌 (28)
- "시민사회단체 홈페이지", ~
- "고구려역사연대"[URL]
- "고구려연구회(사)"[URL]
- "국학운동시민연합 홈페이지"[URL]
- "아시아평화와 역사교육연대"[URL]
- "우리역사바로알기시민연대"[URL]
- "참여하는 4050 전문가 연대(참사련)"[URL]
- "흥사단"[URL]
- "조선일보 2003.11-2007.11", ~ (2003)
- 고구려연구재단, "2004년 고구려연구재단 연구자료 편람집" (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 송기호, "동아시아의 역사분쟁" (2007), 솔
- 신형식, "고구려는 중국사인가" (2004), 백산 자료원
- 월간중앙 역사탐험팀, "역사탐험 2004-2 ; 2004-3 ; 2004-4", ~ (2004)
- 월간중앙, "광개토대왕이 중국인이라고?" (2004), 중앙일보시사미디어
- 윤휘탁, "신중화주의" (2006), 푸른역사
- 유용태, "환호속의 경종" (2006), 휴머니스트
- 김인성, "역사적 진실 왜곡에 대한 비판과 반성", ~
- 김지훈, "한중 역사 갈등 줄이기", 역사문제연구, (17)
- 김희교, "한국 언론의 동북공정 보도 비판", 역사비평, 69 (2004)
- 박선영, "논단 : 정체성 게임 시대의 중국과의 역사전쟁", 역사학보, 182
- 박장배, "중국의 ‘소수민족’정책과 지역구조", 고구려연구재단 제1차 국내학술회의 발표논문
- 반병률, "동북공정에 대한 우리나라의 대응과 반성 in: 중국의 동북공정 5년, 그 성과와 한국의 대응", ~ (2007)
- 안병우, "중국의 고구려사 왜곡과 동북공정", 국제정치연구, 7(2) (2004)
- 유용태, "중화민족론과 동북지정학― 논리근거", 동양사학연구, (93), pp.177~225 (2005), 동양사학회
- 이희옥, "중국의 ‘동북공정’ 추진현황과 참여기관 실태 in: 중국의 동북공정과 중화주의" (2005), 고구려연구재단
- 임기환, "중국의 동북공정과 한국 역사학계의 대응: 고구려사 인식을 중심으로", 사림, 26(26), pp.1~22 (2006), 수선사학회
- 임기환, "중국의 동북공정이 남긴 것", 역사와 현실, 62
- 정두희, "논단 : 중국의 동북공정으로 제기된 한국사학계의 몇 가지 문제", 역사학보, 183 (2004)