본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한중간 영토 분쟁에 대한 비판적 검토 - 한중 양국의 논리와 대응 -

A Critical Review of Territorial Dispute between Korea and China - The logic and responses of Korea and China -

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The objective of the present study was to make a critical review of Korea-China territorial dispute, which is one of important disputes between the two countries throughout history, and to consider how to resolve the dispute. Specifically, we analyzed previous researches in Korea and China on the issue of Gando, which is the core of the territorial dispute between Korea and China and examined Chinese logic in the dispute and its response to the problem, and proposed strategic plans for the territorial dispute in a macroscopic position. Chapter I studied discussions on the issue of Gando in the Korean side from the viewpoints of history and international law. First, from the viewpoint of history, we examined previous researches on the geographical boundary of Gando, the existence of no-man’s land, the interpretation of ‘Dongwitomun (東爲土門)’ in Mt. Paektu Demarcation Stone, and the reason for the rise of the issue of Gando in the territorial negotiation in 1885 and the territorial negotiation in 1887. Next, from the viewpoint of international law, we examined the legal effect of Mt. Paektu Demarcation Stone (1712), the legal effect of the Gando Convention (1909), and the legal effect of the North Korean-Chinese Boundary Protocol (1964) and its succession after reunification. Chapter II explained Chinese research on the issue of Gando and the structure of its logic. On the assumption that ‘Gando does not exist,’ Chinese researchers concentrated their efforts on proving that the issue of Gando was fabricated by Japan in the course of Japanese invasion to Manchuria. Chapter III reviewed Chinese logic and responses in its territorial disputes with other countries including the dispute over the dominium of Dao-Yu-Dao with Japan and the dispute over the dominium of Spratly Islands with Vietnam. Based on the discussions above, Chapter IV proposed strategic plans to cope with the issue of Gando. Specifically, first, research on Gando should be made anew separately from the issue of the dominium of Gando. Second, for research on the issue of Gando, data should be collected and the results of previous researches should be organized systematically. Third, the expected results of maintaining the dominium of Gando should be discussed from different aspects. What to be emphasized most of all is paying attention to Chinese logic and strategies concerning this matter.

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to make a critical review of Korea-China territorial dispute, which is one of important disputes between the two countries throughout history, and to consider how to resolve the dispute. Specifically, we analyzed previous researches in Korea and China on the issue of Gando, which is the core of the territorial dispute between Korea and China and examined Chinese logic in the dispute and its response to the problem, and proposed strategic plans for the territorial dispute in a macroscopic position. Chapter I studied discussions on the issue of Gando in the Korean side from the viewpoints of history and international law. First, from the viewpoint of history, we examined previous researches on the geographical boundary of Gando, the existence of no-man’s land, the interpretation of ‘Dongwitomun (東爲土門)’ in Mt. Paektu Demarcation Stone, and the reason for the rise of the issue of Gando in the territorial negotiation in 1885 and the territorial negotiation in 1887. Next, from the viewpoint of international law, we examined the legal effect of Mt. Paektu Demarcation Stone (1712), the legal effect of the Gando Convention (1909), and the legal effect of the North Korean-Chinese Boundary Protocol (1964) and its succession after reunification. Chapter II explained Chinese research on the issue of Gando and the structure of its logic. On the assumption that ‘Gando does not exist,’ Chinese researchers concentrated their efforts on proving that the issue of Gando was fabricated by Japan in the course of Japanese invasion to Manchuria. Chapter III reviewed Chinese logic and responses in its territorial disputes with other countries including the dispute over the dominium of Dao-Yu-Dao with Japan and the dispute over the dominium of Spratly Islands with Vietnam. Based on the discussions above, Chapter IV proposed strategic plans to cope with the issue of Gando. Specifically, first, research on Gando should be made anew separately from the issue of the dominium of Gando. Second, for research on the issue of Gando, data should be collected and the results of previous researches should be organized systematically. Third, the expected results of maintaining the dominium of Gando should be discussed from different aspects. What to be emphasized most of all is paying attention to Chinese logic and strategies concerning this matter.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 신기석, "간도 영유권에 관한 연구" (1979), 탐구당
  2. 노계현, "한국외교사론" (1984), 대왕사
  3. 강석화, "조선후기 함경도와 북방 영토의식" (2000), 경세원
  4. 이한기, "한국의 영토" (1969), 서울대학교출판부
  5. 篠田治策, "白頭山定界碑" (1938), 樂浪書院
  6. 이석우, "동아시아의 영토 분쟁과 국제법" (2007), 집문당
  7. 吳祿貞, "延吉邊務報告" (1907)
  8. 이성환, "간도는 누구의 땅인가" (2004), 살림
  9. 이창위, "동북아 지역의 영유권 분쟁과 한국의 대응전략" (2006), 다운샘
  10. 이춘근, "동아시아의 해양 분쟁과 해군력 증강 현황" (1998), 한국해양전략연구소
  11. 박종귀, "아시아의 분쟁" (2000), 새로운 사람들
  12. 안병우, "중국의 변강 인식과 갈등" (2007), 한신대학교출판부
  13. 신각수, "국경 분쟁의 국제법적 해결에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1991
  14. 황명준, "간도 영유권 문제의 국제법적 분석", 석사, pp.2005
  15. 이일걸, "중국의 동북공정과 간도 영유권 문제", 백산학회 주최 학술대회 발표 자료집 (2004)
  16. 박선영, "정체성 게임 시대의 중국과의 역사 전쟁:동북 프로젝트를 통해 본 ‘동북’의 의미", 역사학보, 182 (2004)
  17. 박선영, "중국학계의 조선과 청조간 국경 영토 논리와 그 한계", 한국사론, 40 (2004)
  18. 최장근, "간도 문제에 있어서 일제 논리의 수용 가능성", 한국사론, 41 (2004), .
  19. 이성환, "간도 문제 연구의 회고와 전망-새로운 연구 지평의 확장을 위한 비판적 검토-", 백산학보, 76 (2006)
  20. 김기훈, "근대 중국 동북(만주)사 연구의 동향", 백산학보, 47 (1996)
  21. 김춘선, "압록,두만강 국경 문제에 관한 한,중 양국의 연구 동향", 한국사학보, 12 (2002)
  22. 秋月望, "朝淸境界問題にみられゐ朝鮮の『領域觀』-『勘界談判』後から日露戰爭期まで-", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 40 (2002)
  23. 노영돈, "백두산 지역에 있어서 북한과 중국의 국경 분쟁과 국제법", 국제법논총, 35(2) (1990)
  24. 백산학회, "간도문제와 국제법 in; 한국의 북방영토" (1998), 백산자료원
  25. 孫春日, "‘간도’ 문제에 대한 중국의 인식", 인하대학교 법과대학 제4차 국제법주간 국제학술대회 논문집 (2005)
  26. 배성준, "중국의 ‘간도 문제’ 연구 동향 n; 중국의 민족, 변강 문제 연구 동향" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  27. 한철호, "근대 한중 국경조약과 국경 문제의 연구 현황과 과제 in: 한중관계사 연구의 성과와 과제" (2003), 국사편찬위원회, 한국사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)