무라카미 하루키의「헛간을 태우다」와 이창동의 <버닝>에 나타난 세계관-서사방법과 시대와의 상관성을 중심으로

Abstract

This paper analyzes the worldviews of Haruki Murakami's short story Barn Burning and the movie Burning directed by Lee Chang Dong and presents the worldview of those works. In doing so, it attempts to derive the point that this worldview depends on the historical values ​​of the time. This is especially true in the case of Burning, which is a meta narrative; in this story, Jongsu wrote a novel not because of truth, but because of anger, which I consider a point of violence. The novel Barn Burning is a work on whether a novelist, the main character ‘I’, can accept the world parallel world. On the other hand, the movie Burning shows that there are multiple facts by recognition, and it is about a meta novel in which Jongsu, aspiring to be a novelist, writes novels. Jongsu feels that the world is a mystery, but with the disappearance of Hemi, he recognizes one fact and finally completes the novel. And it was the anger by the class differences that prompted the writing of Jongsu’s novel. The novel Barn Burning depicts multiple existing worlds, including a parallel world that reflects the postmodernism of the 1980s. On the other hand, Burning depicts the process of completing a novel by selecting one of several facts that exists for Jongsu, who aspires to be a novelist. Jongsu wrote the novel as a sign of anger in the class society, which reflects the reality of South Korean youth.