A Study of Subsidy Policy in the Ship Financing Market
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study considers the case in which governments decide whether to support private commercial banks with a subsidy policy in order to encourage participation in the international ship financing market. We examine two cases: (i) identical efficiency between domestic and foreign commercial banks; and (ii) different efficiencies between these banks. In the first case, the domestic government has the incentive to provide a subsidy strategy for domestic commercial banks to maximize social welfare, while the foreign government does not use the subsidy support. Furthermore, in the second case, foreign governments and commercial banks always prefer the subsidy strategy in order to maximize both social welfare and profits. However, the domestic government uses the subsidy strategy depending on the efficiency gap between the two banks. Our model suggests that governments need to support commercial banks with an appropriate subsidy strategy (direct or indirect) to promote participation in the market.
Abstract
This study considers the case in which governments decide whether to support private commercial banks with a subsidy policy in order to encourage participation in the international ship financing market. We examine two cases: (i) identical efficiency between domestic and foreign commercial banks; and (ii) different efficiencies between these banks. In the first case, the domestic government has the incentive to provide a subsidy strategy for domestic commercial banks to maximize social welfare, while the foreign government does not use the subsidy support. Furthermore, in the second case, foreign governments and commercial banks always prefer the subsidy strategy in order to maximize both social welfare and profits. However, the domestic government uses the subsidy strategy depending on the efficiency gap between the two banks. Our model suggests that governments need to support commercial banks with an appropriate subsidy strategy (direct or indirect) to promote participation in the market.
참고문헌 (15)
- Chen, C. H., "Privatization and optimal share release in the Chinese banking industry", Economic Modelling, 26, pp.1161~1171 (2009)
- Cho, G., "The Shipping Industry Support Policies in Leading Countries and Its Implications" (2012), Hyundai Research Institute
- 박지혜, "한국과 중국 향장품의 수출경쟁력 비교를 통한 수출성장 전략", 통상정보연구, 14(2), pp.317~346 (2012), 한국통상정보학회
- Fries, S., "Market entry, privatization and bank performance in transition", Economics of Transition, 14, pp.579~610 (2006)
- Hwang, D., "Development Strategy for Korean Ship Financing", Busan Development Forum (2012)
- Klein, M. A., "A theory of the banking firm", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 3, pp.205~218 (1971)
- "Maritime Korea", Korea Maritime Research Institute, ~ (2011)
- "Maritime Korea", Korea Maritime Research Institute, ~ (2012)
- "Maritime Korea", Korea Maritime Research Institute, ~ (2013)
- Monti, M., "Mathematical Methods in Investment and Finance" (1972), North-Holland
- 박광서, "한국 해운산업 발전을 위한 선박금융 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 해운물류연구, 27(4), pp.695~718 (2011), 한국해운물류학회
- Purroy, P., "Strategic competition in retail banking under expense preference behavior", Journal of Banking & Finance, 24, pp.809~824 (2000)
- Saha, B., "Mixed ownership managerial incentives and bank competition", Bulletin of Economic Research, 63, pp.385~403 (2010)
- Tirole, J., "The Theory of Corporate Finance" (2006), Princeton University Press
- Xavier, F., "Microeconomics of Banking" (2008), MIT Press