본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Evidentiary Uncertainty and Negligence Rules

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류경제학

초록

Abstract

This paper analyzes the effects of evidentiary uncertainty on people's incentives to abide by rules in the context of negligence rules in tort law. It demonstrates that i) the comparative negligence rule is not necessarily superior to the simple or the contributory negligence rule, ii) an application of lenient standards of due care under the contributory negligence rule than in comparative negligence rule would not necessarily restore social efficiency, and iii) a partial reduction of legal uncertainty would not necessarily improve social efficiency. These results contrast previous theoretical literature.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Bar Gill, O, "The Uneasy Case for Comparative Negligence", 5, pp.433~469 (2003)
  2. Bulow, "Journal of Political Economy 93", pp.3 488~1985 511 (1985)
  3. Calfee, "Some Effects of Uncertainty on Compliance with Legal Standards", pp.965~1004 (1984)
  4. Cooter, "An Economic Case for Comparative Negligence", pp.1067~110 (1986)
  5. and Calfee, "Journal of Law", eco(mics), pp.2 279~1986 303 (1986)
  6. Edlin, "Efficient Standards of Due Care Should Courts Find More Parties Negligent under Comparative Negligence? International Review of Law and Economics 14", pp.1 21~1994 34 (1994)
  7. Haddock,D, "An Economic Theory of Comparative Negligence", 16, pp.49~72 (1985)
  8. Kahan,M, "Causation and Incentives to Take Care under the Negligence Rule", 18, pp.427~47 (1989)
  9. Shavell, S, "Economic Analysis of Accident Law", 9483 (2003)
  10. London, "Economic Analysis of Accident Law" (1987), Harvard University Press
  11. Yoo, Yoon Ha, "Is Reducing Legal Uncertainty Always Desirable?", 1(1), pp.13~33 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)