國會議員 免責特權의 範圍와 限界 그리고 改善方案
A Scope, Limit and Improvement Plan of the Parliamentary Privilege of Speech
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the development of modern parliamentary institutions, the privilege of speech has been established as the privilege for preserving legislative independence and autonomy. Especially, the main object of privilege is to protect the right of the national assembly, and its members to enable them to carry out their constitutional functions effectively, against outside interference. It is said that the privilege of speech is one of the cornerstones of parliamentary democracy, or so essential to the rights of the people. However, recently the reappraisal and restriction of privilege of speech has been debated according to the abuse of privilege of speech by assemblyman. Because the privilege of speech is not unlimited, it is used to take within limited extent. If the privilege of speech is abused, the legislative activity of opposition will be seriously restricted. As the way of restriction of the privilege of speech, there are legislative control, self-regulation, political control, strategic control, etc. And in order to establish a real parliament democracy, the national assembly and its members themselves must make a effort to ensure their own privilege. Above all, I think it is desirable that national assembly resolves the problems of the privilege of speech for itself by strengthening stature and function of National Assembly Special Committee on Ethics.
Abstract
With the development of modern parliamentary institutions, the privilege of speech has been established as the privilege for preserving legislative independence and autonomy. Especially, the main object of privilege is to protect the right of the national assembly, and its members to enable them to carry out their constitutional functions effectively, against outside interference. It is said that the privilege of speech is one of the cornerstones of parliamentary democracy, or so essential to the rights of the people. However, recently the reappraisal and restriction of privilege of speech has been debated according to the abuse of privilege of speech by assemblyman. Because the privilege of speech is not unlimited, it is used to take within limited extent. If the privilege of speech is abused, the legislative activity of opposition will be seriously restricted. As the way of restriction of the privilege of speech, there are legislative control, self-regulation, political control, strategic control, etc. And in order to establish a real parliament democracy, the national assembly and its members themselves must make a effort to ensure their own privilege. Above all, I think it is desirable that national assembly resolves the problems of the privilege of speech for itself by strengthening stature and function of National Assembly Special Committee on Ethics.
참고문헌 (14)
- 정만희, "현대헌법과 의회주의" (1995), 법문사
- 김선택, "국회의원의 면책특권?불체포특권 제한입법의 헌법적 한계", 10(3) (2004)
- 김형성, "국회의원의 면책특권과 불체포특권 -헌법 및 법률개정 논의 중심으로-", 16(2) (2004), 성균관대학교 비교법연구소
- 박규환, "국회의원 면책특권의 허용범위 확정에 관한 기본권 이론적 연구 -인격권(명예훼손)을 중심으로-", 34집(3) (2006)
- 신동운, "“국회의원의 면책특권과 그 형사법적 효과”" (1993), 서울대학교 법학
- 이금옥, "대통령의 사면권 행사의 법적 문제와 통제", 5(2) (1999)
- 이금옥, "미국에 있어서 대통령 사면권의 운용실태", 12집(1) (2006)
- 이금옥, "선거법상 낙천?낙선운동의 위법성 문제", 29집(4) (2001)
- 정만희, "“국회의원의 면책특권”", (10) (1990)
- 최윤철, "국회의원의 면책특권의 보호범위에 관한 연구", 11집 (2003)
- 原田一明, "議會特權の憲法的考察" (1995), 信山社
- John E. NowaK, "Constitutional Law" (2004), West, a Thomson business
- Laurence H. Tribe, "American Constitutional Law", 1 (2000), New York, Foundation Press
- Smith, Stanley De, "Constitutional and Administrative Law" (1998), Penguin Books
