국회의원의 면책특권의 제한
Restriction on National Assembly Member's Immunity from Responsibility
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The National Assembly Member's immunity from responsibility is regulated in Article 45 of Constitution of the Republic of Korea. In the past time, the National Assembly member had exercised this immunity from responsibility to reveal, and to correct the concealment, the inventions and fabrication of unlawful exercise power by power authority, power man and community officials. Recently, the National Assembly member often make use of this immunity from responsibility, disclose false contents in the point of party politics, has the advantage of political situation and public opinion. Particularly, if the National Assembly member pour down political attack for the other party by making use of this immunity from responsibility about election time, this political attack distort public opinion, and bring to reverse of election, and infringe the pair election principle. Therefore, it need to restrict the immunity from responsibility of the National Assembly member. In this paper, I will trying to work the following questions. First, I will trying to find out the meaning of immunity responsibility and the historical record of immunity from responsibility. Second, I will trying to study the necessity of the restriction on immunity from responsibility. To restrict on immunity from responsibility, the Constitution of the Republic of Korea Article 45 prescribed "No member of the National Assembly shall be held responsible outside the National Assembly for opinions officially expressed or votes cast in the Assembly". In this sentence, I focus on "for opinions officially expressed", and re-set up the meaning of it and then I will try to present the method of the restriction on the immunity from responsibility.
Abstract
The National Assembly Member's immunity from responsibility is regulated in Article 45 of Constitution of the Republic of Korea. In the past time, the National Assembly member had exercised this immunity from responsibility to reveal, and to correct the concealment, the inventions and fabrication of unlawful exercise power by power authority, power man and community officials. Recently, the National Assembly member often make use of this immunity from responsibility, disclose false contents in the point of party politics, has the advantage of political situation and public opinion. Particularly, if the National Assembly member pour down political attack for the other party by making use of this immunity from responsibility about election time, this political attack distort public opinion, and bring to reverse of election, and infringe the pair election principle. Therefore, it need to restrict the immunity from responsibility of the National Assembly member. In this paper, I will trying to work the following questions. First, I will trying to find out the meaning of immunity responsibility and the historical record of immunity from responsibility. Second, I will trying to study the necessity of the restriction on immunity from responsibility. To restrict on immunity from responsibility, the Constitution of the Republic of Korea Article 45 prescribed "No member of the National Assembly shall be held responsible outside the National Assembly for opinions officially expressed or votes cast in the Assembly". In this sentence, I focus on "for opinions officially expressed", and re-set up the meaning of it and then I will try to present the method of the restriction on the immunity from responsibility.
참고문헌 (18)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2009), 법문사
- 권형준, "國會議員의 免責特權에 관한 考察", 법학논총, 24(4), pp.9~26 (2007), 법학연구소
- 김철수, "(학설판례)헌법학(下)" (2008), 박영사
- 박봉국, "최신 국회법(제3판)" (2004), 박영사
- 성낙인, "헌법학 제3판" (2011), 법문사
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론 제5판" (2011), 박영사
- 정희철, "(기본강의)헌법 개정6판" (2011), 도서출판 여산
- 최윤철, "국회의원의 면책특권" (2006), 고시계
- 전광석, "한국헌법론 제7판" (2011), 집현재
- 홍성방, "헌법학(개정6판)" (2009), 현암사
- 이재상, "형법각론(제5판)" (2007), 박영사
- 김준호, "민법강의" (2009), 법문사
- John E. Nowak, "Constitutional Law(Sevnth Edition)" (2009), West Publishing Co
- von Munch, "Grundgesetz-Kommentar" (1983), Band2
- Zippelius, "Deutsches Staatrecht" (2005)
- 佐藤幸治, "議員の免責特權について覺書", 法學論叢, 126(4)
- 原田一明, "國會議員の免責特權(2)-國會議員の發言と國家賠償責任-, 憲法判例百選Ⅱ", 別冊ジュリスト, (155) (2000)
- 淸田雄治, "國會議員の免責特權(1)-第1次國會亂鬪事件-, 憲法判例百選Ⅱ", 別冊ジュリ スト, (155) (2000)
