대공황에 대한 고등학교 사회과 교과서 서술의 문제점과개선방안
The Great Depression in High School Social Science Textbooks : Critiques and Suggestions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Great Depression is one of the most important economic incidents in the twentieth century. A significant and long-lasting impact of this event is the rise of the government intervention to the economy. Under the catastrophic downturn of the economic condition worldwide, people required their government to play an active role for economic recovery, and this mentalité prolonged even after the Second World War. Social science textbooks taught at Korean high schools mostly referred to the Great Depression for explaining the reason of government intervention in economy. However, the mainstream view commonly found in the textbooks provides a misleading theological interpretation. It argues that inherent flaws of the market economy causes over-production/under-consumption, and that this mismatch ends up with economic crisis. The chaotic situation was resolved by substitution of the governments for the market, and the New Deal was introduced as the monumental example (‘laissez-faire economy →over-production→the Great Depression→government intervention→economic recovery’). Based on economic historians’ researches for past three decades, I argue that this mainstream view commits the fallacy of ex-post justification. Unlike what the mainstream view claims, the Great Depression was neither the result of the ‘market failure’, nor the recovery from the Great Depression but was due to successful government policies. For substantiating this claim, I suggest three points. First, blaming the weakness or instability of the market economy as the cause of the Great Depression is groundless. Unlike what the textbooks describe, the rise of the U.S. stock price during the 1920s cannot be said as a bubble, and there was no sign of under-consumption during the 1920s. On the contrary, a new consensus emerging from the 1980s among economic historians illustrates that the Great Depression was originated from ‘the government failure’ rather than from the ‘market failure’. Policymakers of European countries tried to return to the gold standard regime before the First World War, but discrepancies between this policy and the reality made the world economy vulnerable. Second, the mainstream view identifies the New Deal as Keynesian interventionism and glorifies it for saving the U.S. economy from the crisis. However, this argument is not true. The New Deal was not Keynesian at all. What the U.S. government actually tried was not macroeconomic stabilization but price and quantity control. In addition, New Deal did not brought about economic recovery that people generally believe. Even after the New Deal, industrial production or employment level remained quite low until the late 1930s. Lastly, studies on individual New Deal policies show that they did not work as they were intended. For example, the National Industrial Recovery Act increased unemployment, and the Agricultural Adjustment Act expelled tenants from their land. Third, the mainstream view characterizes the economic order before the Great Depression as laissez-faire, and it tends to attribute all the vice during the Industrial Revolution era to the uncontrolled market economy. However, historical studies show that various economic and social problems of the Industrial Revolution period such as inequality problems, child labor, or environmental problems cannot be simply ascribed to the problems of the market economy. In conclusion, the remedy for all these problems in high school textbooks is not to use the Great Depression as an example showing the weakness of the market economy. The Great Depression should be introduced simply as a historical momentum that had initiated the growth of government intervention. This reform of high school textbooks is imperative for enhancing the right understanding of economy and history.
Abstract
The Great Depression is one of the most important economic incidents in the twentieth century. A significant and long-lasting impact of this event is the rise of the government intervention to the economy. Under the catastrophic downturn of the economic condition worldwide, people required their government to play an active role for economic recovery, and this mentalité prolonged even after the Second World War. Social science textbooks taught at Korean high schools mostly referred to the Great Depression for explaining the reason of government intervention in economy. However, the mainstream view commonly found in the textbooks provides a misleading theological interpretation. It argues that inherent flaws of the market economy causes over-production/under-consumption, and that this mismatch ends up with economic crisis. The chaotic situation was resolved by substitution of the governments for the market, and the New Deal was introduced as the monumental example (‘laissez-faire economy →over-production→the Great Depression→government intervention→economic recovery’). Based on economic historians’ researches for past three decades, I argue that this mainstream view commits the fallacy of ex-post justification. Unlike what the mainstream view claims, the Great Depression was neither the result of the ‘market failure’, nor the recovery from the Great Depression but was due to successful government policies. For substantiating this claim, I suggest three points. First, blaming the weakness or instability of the market economy as the cause of the Great Depression is groundless. Unlike what the textbooks describe, the rise of the U.S. stock price during the 1920s cannot be said as a bubble, and there was no sign of under-consumption during the 1920s. On the contrary, a new consensus emerging from the 1980s among economic historians illustrates that the Great Depression was originated from ‘the government failure’ rather than from the ‘market failure’. Policymakers of European countries tried to return to the gold standard regime before the First World War, but discrepancies between this policy and the reality made the world economy vulnerable. Second, the mainstream view identifies the New Deal as Keynesian interventionism and glorifies it for saving the U.S. economy from the crisis. However, this argument is not true. The New Deal was not Keynesian at all. What the U.S. government actually tried was not macroeconomic stabilization but price and quantity control. In addition, New Deal did not brought about economic recovery that people generally believe. Even after the New Deal, industrial production or employment level remained quite low until the late 1930s. Lastly, studies on individual New Deal policies show that they did not work as they were intended. For example, the National Industrial Recovery Act increased unemployment, and the Agricultural Adjustment Act expelled tenants from their land. Third, the mainstream view characterizes the economic order before the Great Depression as laissez-faire, and it tends to attribute all the vice during the Industrial Revolution era to the uncontrolled market economy. However, historical studies show that various economic and social problems of the Industrial Revolution period such as inequality problems, child labor, or environmental problems cannot be simply ascribed to the problems of the market economy. In conclusion, the remedy for all these problems in high school textbooks is not to use the Great Depression as an example showing the weakness of the market economy. The Great Depression should be introduced simply as a historical momentum that had initiated the growth of government intervention. This reform of high school textbooks is imperative for enhancing the right understanding of economy and history.
참고문헌 (53)
- 권남훈, "고등학교 심화과정 경제관련 교과서에 대한 평가", 경제교육연구, 12(2), pp.1~26 (2005)
- 김은숙, "고등학교 세계사" (2003), (주)교학사
- 김재한, "고등학교 사회" (2002), 법문사
- 김주환, "고등학교 사회" (2002), (주)중앙교육진흥연구소
- 김진영 외, "ㅍ고등학교 경제" (2003), (주)대한교과서
- 박인옥, "제7차 사회과 교과서 편찬과정에 대한 사례 연구", 시민교육연구, 31, pp.143~183 (2000)
- 박종희, "고등학교 사회" (2003), (주)천재교육
- 박형준, "고등학교 1학년 사회의 경제 단원 내용 분석", 경제교육연구, 12(2), pp.27~46 (2005)
- 손봉호, "고등학교 사회" (2002), (주)두산
- 양동휴, "20세기 경제사" (2006), 일조각
- 양동휴, "1930년대 세계대공황 연구" (2000), 서울대학교 출판부
- 오경섭, "고등학교 사회" (2002), (주)도서출판 디딤돌
- 오금성, "고등학교 세계사" (2003), (주)금성출판사
- 오영수, "고등학교 경제" (2003), (주)교학사
- 오창훈, "고등학교 세계사" (2003), 지학사
- 윤동균, "고등학교 경제" (2004), 법문사
- 조병구, "초,중,고등학교 교과서 경제영역 내용 검토 보고서』, 재정경제부?KDI경제정보센터", ~ (2005)
- 전홍렬, "고등학교 경제" (2003), (주)천재교육
- 조도근, "고등학교 경제" (2003), (주)두산
- 조영달, "교육과정의 정치학－7차 사회과 교육과정 결정의 참여구조", 시민교육연구, 31, pp.295~317 (2000)
- 최병모, "고등학교 사회" (2002), (주)대한교과서
- 허우긍, "고등학교 사회" (2003), (주)교학사
- 황만익, "고등학교 사회" (2002), (주)지학사
- Allen, Frederick, "Only Yesterday: An Informal History of the 1920s" (1931), Harper & Low
- Brown, E, "Fiscal Policy in the Thirties: A Reappraisal", American Economic Review, 46(5), pp.857~879 (1956)
- Cole, Harold, "The U.S. and U.K. Great Depression through the Lens of Neoclassical Theory", American Economic Review, 92(2), pp.28~32 (2002)
- Cole, Harold, "New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis", Journal of Political Economy, 112(4), pp.779~816 (2004)
- Eichengreen, Berry, "Golden Fetters: The Gold Standard and the Great Depression, 1919-1939" (1992), Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Eichengreen, Berry, "The Origins and Nature of the Great Slump Revisited", Economic History Review, 45(2) (1992)
- Eichengreen, Barry, "Interwar Unemployment in International Perspective" (1988), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Federal Reserve System, "New Federal Reserve Index of Industrial Production", Federal Serve Bulletin, 26, pp.753~771 (1940)
- Feinstein, Charles, "The European Economy between the Wars" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Friedman, Milton, "A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960" (1963), Princeton
- Galbraith, John, "The Great Crash 1929" (1954), Houghton Mifflin
- Gordon, Scott, "Laissez-Faire,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences", pp.546~549 (1968), MacMillan Company and the Free Press
- Harrod, Roy, "The Life of John Maynard Keynes" (1950), London: MacMillan & Co., Ltd
- Hayek, Friedrich, "The Road to Serfdom" (1944), University of Chicago Press
- Hession, Charles, "A Personal Biography of the Man Who Revolutionized Capitalism and the Way We Live" (1984), Macmillan
- Kindleberger, Charles, "Crashes" (1978), Macmillan
- Kindleberger, Charles, "The World in Depression" (1986), University of California Press
- Lindert, Peter, "Unequal Living Standards", pp.357~386 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Romer, Christina, "The Great Crash and the Onset of the Great Depression", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(3), pp.597~624 (1990)
- Rothermund, Dietmar, "The Global Impact of the Great Depression 1929-1939" (1996), Routledge
- Schumpeter, Joseph, "Capitalism" (1942), Socialism, Democracy
- Schumpeter, Joseph, "History of Economic Analysis" (1954), London:Allen and Unwin
- Skidelsky, Robert, "Vol. 2: The Economist as Saviour 1920-1937" (1992), London: Macmillan
- Sutch, Richard, "Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition, 5 Volumes" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Temin, Peter, "Did Monetary Forces Cause the Great Depression?" (1976), W.W.Norton & Co.,
- Temin, Peter, "Lessons from the Great Depression" (1989), MIT
- Temin, Peter, "The Great Depression", The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, 3, pp.301~328 (2000)
- Temin, Peter, "The End of One Big Deflation, 1933", Explorations in Economic History, 27(4), pp.483~502 (1990)
- The New Encyclopaedia of Britannica, "15th ed" (1990), Chicago
- Whatley, Warren C., "Labor for the Picking: The New Deal in the South", Journal of Economic History, 43(4), pp.905~929 (1983)