원주시 가구의 상수도 수질개선에 대한 지불의사액 추정
Household's Willingness to Pay for Piped Water Quality Improvement in Wonju
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문에서는 상수도 수질개선 프로그램을 시행할 계획을 가지고 있는 원주시를 대상으로 하여 상수도 수질개선에 대한 가구의 지불의사액을 분석하고자 한다. 이를 위해 조건부 가치측정법(CVM)을 적용하되, CVM 연구에서 지켜야 할 다양한 지침을 엄격하게 준수하면서 가구조사를 시행하였다. 구체적으로 원주시 250가구를 무작위로 추출하여 일대일 개별면접을 통해 상수도 수질개선 프로그램에 대해 얼마나 지불할 의사가 있는지를 물었다. 응답자들은 전반적으로 조건부 시장을 잘 받아들였으며 가구당 월 평균 1,583원에서 2,776원의 지불의사액을 가지고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 지불의사는 성별, 교육수준, 소득 등과 같은 가구특성변수에 유의하게 영향을 받았다. 이 값을 원주 전체로 확장하였더니 연간 약 19.9억 원에서 34.9억 원에 해당하였다. 이 값은 상수도 수질개선이 경제적으로 바람직한지 여부를 결정하기 위한 비용-편익분석에서 편익의 값으로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
This paper attempts to examine householdswillingness to pay (WTP) for piped water quality improvement in Wonju, where the local government are planning to implement a piped water quality improvement program. We apply a contingent valuation (CV) method to obtain at least a preliminary evaluation of the WTP. The CV survey was rigorously designed to comply with the guidelines for best-practiced CV studies. We surveyed a randomly selected sample of 250 households in Wonju and asked respondents questions in person-to-person interviews about how much they would be willing to pay for the program. Respondents overall accepted the contingent market and were willing to contribute a significant amount (1,583 to 2,776 won), on average, per household per month. This willingness varies according to individual characteristics such as sex, education level, and income. The aggregate value of the program in Wonju amounts to approximately 1.99 billion won to 3.49 billion won per year. The household values can be the benefits that ensue from the program and compared with the costs of the program to determine whether the program is economically desirable.
참고문헌 (34)
- "수질개선의 편익추정 조건부가치측정법과 반모수 추정법의 적용"
- 김도형, "회피행동 분석을 이용한 서울시 수돗물 수질개선의 편익 측정", pp.337~358 (1994)
- 김재홍, "울산시의 상수도 수질개선의 편익 측정", 10(3), pp.245~262 (2001)
- 정기호, "대구시 수돗물 수질개선의 편익분석:모수 및 준모수적 접근법 응용", 6(2), pp.223~257 (1997)
- Alberini, A, "Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-pay Estimates", 29, pp.169~180 (1995)
- Arrow, "Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation", pp.4601~4614 (1993)
- Bergstrom J.C, "The Economic Value of Water Quality" (2001), Edward Elgar
- Birol, E.K.K, "Using Economic Valuation Techniques to Inform Water Resources Management: A Survey and Critical Appraisal of Available Techniques and an Application" (2006), Science of the Total Environment
- Bjornstad, D.J, "The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources:Methodological Issues and Research Needs" (1996), Edward Elgar
- Brent, R.J, "Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis" (1995), Edward Elgar
- Cameron, T.A. and D. James, "Efficient Estimation Methods for Closed-ended Contingent Valuation Surveys Review of Economics and Statistics 69", pp.269~276 (1987)
- Cameron, "Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice With Follow-Up Questionnaire Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27", pp.218~234 (1994)
- Cooper, J, "Referendum Contingent Valuation" (1995), USDA Economic Research Search Service
- Fisher, A, "The Conceptual Underpinnings of the Contingent Valuation Method, The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources", pp.19~37 (1996), Edward Elgar
- Frederick, K.D, "Economic Values of Freshwater in the United States" (1996), Resources for the Future
- Garrod, G, "Economic Valuation of the Environment" (1999), Edward Elgar
- Gonzalez-Caban, A, "Economic Benefits of Maintaining Ecological Integrity of Rio Mameyes, in Puerto Rico", 21, pp.63~75 (1997)
- "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66", pp.332~341 (1984), Hanemann
- Hanemann, W.M, "The Statistical Analysis of Discrete-response CV Data" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Loomis, "Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73", pp.1255~1263 (1991), Hanemann
- Krinsky, I. and A.L. Robb, "On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities Review of Economics and Statistics 68", pp.715~719 (1986)
- Kristrm, B, "Spike Models in Contingent Valuation", 79, pp.1013~1023 (1997)
- Langford, I.H, "A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Triple-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation", 7, pp.197~211 (1996)
- Loomis, "Comparative Reliability of the Dichotomous Choice and Open-ended Contingent Valuation Techniques Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18", pp.78~85 (1990)
- McConnell, "Models for Referendum Data the Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18"
- Mitchell, "Using Surveys to Value Public Goods Resources for the Future" (1989)
- Um, M.-J, "Estimating Willingness to Pay for Improved Drinking Water Quality Using Averting Behavior Method with Perception Measure", 21, pp.287~302 (2002)
- Yoo, S.-H, "Application of Sample Selection Model to Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Studies", 20(2), pp.147~163 (2001)
- Yoo, S.-H, "A Note on a Bayesian Approach to a Dichotomous Choice Environmental Valuation Model", 31(10), pp.1203~1209 (2004)
- "South Koreans' Willingness to Pay for Korean Unification", 11(1), pp.15~19 (2004)
- Yoo, S.-H, "Measuring the Economic Benefits of the Ozone Pollution Control Policy in Seoul :Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey", 38, pp.49~60 (2001)
- Yoo, S.-H, "Using a Spike Model to Deal with Zero Response Data from Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys", 9, pp.929~932 (2002)
- Young, R.A, "Measuring Economic Benefit for Water Investment and Policies" (1996), The World Bank
- Young, R.A, "Measuring Economic Benefit for Water Investment and Policies" (1996), The World Bank