대법원 판결에 나타난 공동행위 성립요건으로서 상호성에 관한 고찰
A Study on Interrelation as a Requirements for Cartel in the Supreme Court's Decision
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In a series of rulings on cases of cartels under the Monopoly Regulation Act, the Supreme Court shows that it understands interrelation as a requisite for establishment. In particular, in the case of Universal Music Supreme Court ruled that cartel regulated under Article 19 clause 1 of the Monopoly Regulation Act mean agreements, this agreement includes not only explicit agreements but also implied ones, it is based on meeting of the minds among cartel participants and the interrelation of the meeting of the minds shall be demonstrated for the verification of the agreement. The ruling has since had a substantial impact on the Supreme Court's ruling on cartels. It seems reasonable for the Supreme Court to identify interrelation as a requirement for the establishment of cartels. However, there is a question of judging on the basis of whether there is sufficient possibility of independent action in identifying interrelation. This method of judgment can cause concerns of under-execution(false negative) in relation to the cartels subject to regulation. Considering the characteristics of oligopolistic market structures, it should be considered that participants act strategically and the their attitude toward competition should also be reflected in the judgment of interrelation.
Abstract
In a series of rulings on cases of cartels under the Monopoly Regulation Act, the Supreme Court shows that it understands interrelation as a requisite for establishment. In particular, in the case of Universal Music Supreme Court ruled that cartel regulated under Article 19 clause 1 of the Monopoly Regulation Act mean agreements, this agreement includes not only explicit agreements but also implied ones, it is based on meeting of the minds among cartel participants and the interrelation of the meeting of the minds shall be demonstrated for the verification of the agreement. The ruling has since had a substantial impact on the Supreme Court's ruling on cartels. It seems reasonable for the Supreme Court to identify interrelation as a requirement for the establishment of cartels. However, there is a question of judging on the basis of whether there is sufficient possibility of independent action in identifying interrelation. This method of judgment can cause concerns of under-execution(false negative) in relation to the cartels subject to regulation. Considering the characteristics of oligopolistic market structures, it should be considered that participants act strategically and the their attitude toward competition should also be reflected in the judgment of interrelation.
참고문헌 (18)
- 권오승, "독점규제법-이론과 실무" (2016), 법문사
- 이 황, "정보교환의 담합 여부에 관한 대법원 판례와 여운", 법률신문, ~ (2016)
- 정재훈, "부당한 공동행위 성립 요건으로서 ‘합의’에 관한 사실인정의 한계, 유니버설 뮤직 사건", 경쟁저널, (175) (2014)
- 정재훈, "공정거래법 소송실무" (2014), 육법사
- 정호열, "경제법 제4판" (2012), 박영사
- 조혜신, "독점규제법상 ‘합의의 도그마’ 논의의 향방 - 합의의 입증과 관련된 최근 대법원 판결에 대한 분석을 중심으로 -", 아주법학, 9(2), pp.233~255 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 홍명수, "공정거래법 제19조 제1항의 해석과 수평적․수직적 공동행위의 규제 법리 고찰", 동아법학, (61), pp.435~456 (2013), 법학연구소
- 홍명수, "행정소송과 형사소송에서 독점규제법 위반사건의 비교 검토", 경제법연구, 14(3), pp.261~292 (2015), 한국경제법학회[DOI]
- Areeda, P. E., "Antitrust Law Vol. VI" (1986), Brown and Company
- Ezrachi, A., "EU Competition Law" (2010), Hart Publishing
- Hovenkamp, H., "Federal Antitrust Policly-The Law of Competition and Its Practice" (2011), West
- On the Meaning of Horizontal Agreements in Competition Law, "Kaplow, L.", Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business, ~, pp.Discussion Paper No. 691 (2011)
- Lange, K. W, "Handbuch zum deutschen und europäischen Kartellrecht" (2006), Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH
- OECD, "Trade and Competition: From Doha To Cancun", ~ (2003)
- Rittner, F., "Europäisches und deutsches Wirtschaftsrecht" (2008), C. F. Müller
- Sullivan, E. T., "Understanding Antitrust and Its Economic Implications" (2003), LexicNexis
- Whish, R., "Competition Law" (2012), Oxford Univ. press
- Whish, R., "Competition Law" (2009), Oxford Univ. Press