본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소-일 관계 정상화 과정 분석 -영토쟁점을 중심으로 -

<ABSTRACT> TheProcessAnalysisfortheNormalizationof Soviet-JapaneseTies:A StudyontheTerritorialIssue

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Thispaperfocusesonthe threeaspectsnotonlyinpoliticalchangesof the Soviet Union and Japan but also in the change of international situation.First,sinceWorldWarII,both governmentsdidnothaveofficial exchanges for ten years. However, they tried to resume their foreign relation.This paper shows why they tried to improve and resume the foreignrelation. Second,theyrestoreddiplomaticrelationsthrough fournegotiations,but thepeacetreaty wasnotsigned duetodiscord ofresolving theterritorial dispute.Thus,Iwillexamine why they did notfind the compromise to resolvetheterritorialissuebetweenthem. Third,theissueisrelated toEastAsia securitystrategy.Atthattime,thenormalization between theSovietUnion and Japan through resolution ofterritorialissueisa majorproblem to havea strong influenceon the strategic interestand to expand the geopoliticalinfluence ofthe U.S.in NortheastAsia.Thus,theinfluenceoftheU.S.willhavebeen thecritical factor in the conclusion of the peace treaty and in resolution of the territorialissue.SoIwillalsoanalyzethatthereweretheU.S.changesof stanceontheterritorialdisputeandtheU.S.exertedtheirinfluencein the processofSoviet-Japanesenegotiation. Finally,Iwillexamine the implication in solving the territorialissue between the presentRussian-Japanese governments which was given to them throughthejointstatementin1956.

Abstract

Thispaperfocusesonthe threeaspectsnotonlyinpoliticalchangesof the Soviet Union and Japan but also in the change of international situation.First,sinceWorldWarII,both governmentsdidnothaveofficial exchanges for ten years. However, they tried to resume their foreign relation.This paper shows why they tried to improve and resume the foreignrelation. Second,theyrestoreddiplomaticrelationsthrough fournegotiations,but thepeacetreaty wasnotsigned duetodiscord ofresolving theterritorial dispute.Thus,Iwillexamine why they did notfind the compromise to resolvetheterritorialissuebetweenthem. Third,theissueisrelated toEastAsia securitystrategy.Atthattime,thenormalization between theSovietUnion and Japan through resolution ofterritorialissueisa majorproblem to havea strong influenceon the strategic interestand to expand the geopoliticalinfluence ofthe U.S.in NortheastAsia.Thus,theinfluenceoftheU.S.willhavebeen thecritical factor in the conclusion of the peace treaty and in resolution of the territorialissue.SoIwillalsoanalyzethatthereweretheU.S.changesof stanceontheterritorialdisputeandtheU.S.exertedtheirinfluencein the processofSoviet-Japanesenegotiation. Finally,Iwillexamine the implication in solving the territorialissue between the presentRussian-Japanese governments which was given to them throughthejointstatementin1956.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Rodger Sweringen, "The Soviet Union and Postwar Japan", pp.79~78 (1978), Hoover Institution Press
  2. "每日新聞", ~ (1954)
  3. Анатолий Кошкин, "Россия и Япония: узлы противоречий", pp.330~331 (2010), Вече
  4. 유철종, "동아시아 국제관계와 영토분쟁", pp.275~293 (2006), 삼우사
  5. Takahiko Tanaka, "Kuremurin eno shisetsu - hoppo ryodo kosho 1955~1983", pp.32~34 (1983), Bungeishunju-sha
  6. Donald C. Hellman, "Japanese Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy: The Peace Agreement with the Soviet Union", pp.32~59 (1969), University of California Press
  7. John J. Stephan, "TheKuril Islands : Russo-Japanese Frontierin the Pacific", pp.200~201 (1974), Clarendon Press
  8. Marc Gallicchio, "TheKurilesControversy :U.S. Diplomacy in theSoviet-Japan BorderDispute,1941-1956", The Pacific Historical Review, 60(1), pp.69~101 (1991)
  9. Kimie Hara, "Northern Territories, Asia-Pacific Regional Conflicts and the Al and Experience: Untying the Kurillian knot", pp.55~56 (2009), Routledge
  10. Joseph L. Nogee, "Soviet Foreign Policy", pp.117~118 (1984), Pergamon Press Inc
  11. William F. Nimmo, "Japan and Russia : A Reevaluation in the Post-Soviet Era", pp.46~ (1994), Greenwood Press
  12. David Rees, "The Soviet Seizure of the Kuriles", pp.105~ (1985), Praeger
  13. 岡田和裕, "ロシアから見た北方領土: 日本から見れは不法ても, ロシアにとっては合法", pp.137~ (2012), 潮書房光人社
  14. 장기환, "소련의 외교정책:외교정책의 사회경제적 배경", pp.38~ (1983), 대왕사
  15. Russian Relations since 1945: A Difficult Peace, "Japanese-Soviet", pp.1998, Kimie Hara
  16. Kazuhiko Togo, "Japan's Foreign Policy 1945~2003 : The Questfora Proactive Policy", pp.233~ (2005), Brill Academic Publishers
  17. M. Kajima, "Modern Japan's Foreign Policy", pp.140~ (1970), Ruthland
  18. 渡辺昭夫, "戰後日本の 對外政策", pp.92~93 (1991), 有斐閣選書
  19. 石鄕岡建, "論点整理北方領土問題", pp.30~ (2012), 東洋書店
  20. Donald C. Hellmann, "Japanese Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics", pp.50~51 (1969), University of California Press
  21. Shigero Sugiyama, "Post War Japan & High Seas Fishery", Japanese Annual of International Affairs, 1, pp.76~78 (1961)
  22. Shigero Sugiyama, "Northern Territories of Japan", pp.17~ (1972), Association on Northern Territories Problem
  23. 大徿一, "日ロ平和條約への道: 北方領土問題を考える", pp.234~235 (2010), 光陽出版社
  24. М.К.Гориков, "Курилы:острова в океане проблем", pp.259~260 (1998), РОСПЭН
  25. Noble Frankl, "Documentson International Affairs, 1956", pp.751~ (1959), Oxford University Press
  26. В.О.Кистанов, "Япония в АТР", pp.231~ (1995), Восточная Литература
  27. Takahiko Tanaka, "Nisso kokko kaifuku no shiteki kenkyuu", pp.266~ (1995), Yuhikaku
  28. Е.М.Жуков, "Междунар одные отношения на Дальнем Востоке в послевоенные годы 1958-1976" (1978), Мысль
  29. 大徿一, "ソ連の アジア政策 上", pp.268~ (1981), The Shimul Press
  30. "朝日新聞", ~ (1955)
  31. 나카자와 다카유키, "고르바쵸프와 이케다 다이사크", pp.38~ (2005), 문예림
  32. Raymond L. Garthoff, "A Diplomatic History of the Dispute, In Northern Territories and Beyond: Russian, Japanese, and American Perspectives", pp.19~ (1995), Praeger

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)