본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Putin’s Foreign Policy towards Japan(2000-2008): The Issue of Territorial Dispute

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

This paper examines Russia’s policy towards the territorial issue with Japan during the Putin Era(2000-2008). Both states have failed to narrow differences over the disputes during the Putin regime. Russia’s policy did not change the general attitude towards the territorial issue. Japan’s basic goal also remained unchanged. Both sides did not find a reasonable compromise on the basis of a balance of bilateral interests. That means it is very difficult to resolve the issue in the near future. Thus, I would like to suggest a way of settling the territorial dispute between Russia and Japan. First, any territorial negotiations must be based on long-term strategies. Gradualism represents a realistic approach, they will only make progress in the territorial disputes if they do so in a way that benefits both countries. Second, they must persist in efforts to build mutual trust. Third, they should adopt a more constructive attitude to the territorial problem and show readiness for mutual concessions. Finally, patience in diplomatic negotiations is still valid today in the process of negotiation between Japan and Russia for resolving the territorial dispute.

Abstract

This paper examines Russia’s policy towards the territorial issue with Japan during the Putin Era(2000-2008). Both states have failed to narrow differences over the disputes during the Putin regime. Russia’s policy did not change the general attitude towards the territorial issue. Japan’s basic goal also remained unchanged. Both sides did not find a reasonable compromise on the basis of a balance of bilateral interests. That means it is very difficult to resolve the issue in the near future. Thus, I would like to suggest a way of settling the territorial dispute between Russia and Japan. First, any territorial negotiations must be based on long-term strategies. Gradualism represents a realistic approach, they will only make progress in the territorial disputes if they do so in a way that benefits both countries. Second, they must persist in efforts to build mutual trust. Third, they should adopt a more constructive attitude to the territorial problem and show readiness for mutual concessions. Finally, patience in diplomatic negotiations is still valid today in the process of negotiation between Japan and Russia for resolving the territorial dispute.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Choi,Tai-Kang, "Russian-Japanese Relations in the 2000s:The Issue of Territorial Dispute.The Asia-Pacific Political Science Association,3(2)", ~ (2006)
  2. Choi,Tai-Kang, "Russia and Northeast Asia: Linkages between Domestic and Foreign Policies in the Gorbachev Era" (2008), Seoul: Hallym University Press
  3. Hirasawa,, "Japan’s Emerging Foreign Policy", Foreign Affairs(America), 54 (1975), October 1975
  4. Kimura,Hiroshi, "Distant Neighbors:Japanese-Russian Relations under Gorbachev and Yeltsin.2,Armonk,N.Y.:M.E.Sharpe" (2000), 2, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
  5. Togo,Kazuhiko, "Japan’s Foreign Policy,1945-2003 The Zuest for a Proactive Policy.Boston:Brill" (2005), Boston: Brill.
  6. Yun,Yeongmi, "An Analysis of the Main Difficulties for Russian Transfer Ownership of the Kuril Islands to Japan in the post Soviet Period.Korean Political Science Review.39(4)" (2005), Korean Political Science Review. 39(4).
  7. "Gazeta", ~
  8. "Interfax", ~
  9. "Itar-Tass", ~
  10. "Izvestia", ~
  11. "Mainichi Shimbun", ~
  12. "New Times", ~
  13. "Radio Free Europe", Radio Liberty(RFE, ~
  14. "RIA Novosti", ~
  15. "The Japan Times", ~
  16. "The Times", ~
  17. "Vremya Novostei", ~
  18. "Yomiuri Shimbun", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)