본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 버전 일상생활 청각행동 설문지의 신뢰도와 타당도

Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life Questionnaire

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: The Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL) questionnaire has been proven for its reliability and validity across various cultures for assessing auditory behaviors of children with hearing loss. The study’s purpose was to translate the ABEL questionnaire into Korean and verify reliability and validity of Korean version of ABEL (ABEL-K). Methods: After translation, the ABEL-K evaluated for appropriateness, and back translated by a bilingual user to compare to the original regarding semantic equivalence. ABEL-K was completed by 48 parents of children (from ages 3-15 years) with hearing loss (9 children with hearing aids and 39 children with cochlear implants). Among the 48 children, 11 were in preschool, 16 in elementary, and 21 in secondary. Internal consistency reliability of ABEL-K was verified by Chronbach’s alpha. The mixed factorial ANOVA was conducted to compare the age group and the evaluation areas (aural-oral, auditory awareness, and social/conversational skills). The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the scores and chronological age, and scores and period of CI experience were evaluated, respectively. Results: The results indicated that although ABEL-K showed good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.90), there seems to be issues in its validity due to ambiguous expression and the cultural differences. The ABEL scores among age groups were not significantly different. However, there was a significant difference in ABEL scores between auditory awareness and social/conversational skill areas. There was significant correlation with CI experience, but not with chronological age. Conclusion: Thus, this study suggests a way that ABEL-K should be utilized, taking precautions in the interpretation of the results.

Abstract

Purpose: The Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL) questionnaire has been proven for its reliability and validity across various cultures for assessing auditory behaviors of children with hearing loss. The study’s purpose was to translate the ABEL questionnaire into Korean and verify reliability and validity of Korean version of ABEL (ABEL-K). Methods: After translation, the ABEL-K evaluated for appropriateness, and back translated by a bilingual user to compare to the original regarding semantic equivalence. ABEL-K was completed by 48 parents of children (from ages 3-15 years) with hearing loss (9 children with hearing aids and 39 children with cochlear implants). Among the 48 children, 11 were in preschool, 16 in elementary, and 21 in secondary. Internal consistency reliability of ABEL-K was verified by Chronbach’s alpha. The mixed factorial ANOVA was conducted to compare the age group and the evaluation areas (aural-oral, auditory awareness, and social/conversational skills). The Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the scores and chronological age, and scores and period of CI experience were evaluated, respectively. Results: The results indicated that although ABEL-K showed good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.90), there seems to be issues in its validity due to ambiguous expression and the cultural differences. The ABEL scores among age groups were not significantly different. However, there was a significant difference in ABEL scores between auditory awareness and social/conversational skill areas. There was significant correlation with CI experience, but not with chronological age. Conclusion: Thus, this study suggests a way that ABEL-K should be utilized, taking precautions in the interpretation of the results.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. "Knowledge and skills required for the practice of audiologic/aural rehabilitation" (2001)[URL]
  2. Anderson, K. L., "Relationship of degree of longterm hearing loss to psychosocial impact and educational needs", Educational Audiology Association Newsletter, 8, pp.17~18 (1991)
  3. Bagatto, M. P., "The University of Western Ontario pediatric audiological monitoring protocol(UWO PedAMP)", Trends in Amplification, 15(1), pp.57~76 (2011)
  4. 최재희, "청각장애 아동 대상의 설문지 분석 연구", Audiology and Speech Research, 11(4), pp.331~347 (2015), 한국청각언어재활학회
  5. Geal-Dor, M., "Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life(ABEL)questionnaire in Hebrew and in Arabic and its association with clinical tests in cochlear-implanted children", Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, 25(3), pp.301~306 (2014)
  6. Gfeller, K. E., "Let’s Converse: A “How-To” Guide to Develop and Expand Conversational Skills of Children and Teenagers who are Hearing Impaired", pp.177~212 (1994), Alexander Graham Bell Association
  7. Herrera, M. J., "Adaptación transcultural al español de los instrumentos de tamizaje auditivo para escolares TEAP y ABEL", Revista de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello, 75(2), pp.89~95 (2015)
  8. Paul, P. V., "Toward a Psychology of Deafness: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives" (1993), Allyn & Bacon
  9. Purdy, S. C., "A parental questionnaire to evaluate children’s Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life(ABEL)", American Journal of Audiology, 11(2), pp.72~82 (2002)
  10. Schloss, P. J., "Teaching Social-Skills to Hearing-Impaired Students" (1990), Alexander Graham Bell Association
  11. Schum, R. L., "Communication and social growth : A developmental model of social behavior in deaf children", Ear and Hearing, 12(5), pp.320~327 (1991)
  12. Souza, M. R. F. D., "Questionnaire ABEL-Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life : A study of reliability-internal consistency of the brazilian version and reproducibility for test-retest", Revista CEFAC, 16(6), pp.1763~1774 (2014)
  13. Souza, M. R. F. D., "Translation and adaptation of the ABEL : Auditory behavior in everyday life questionnaire into Brazilian portuguese", Jornal da Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia, 23(4), pp.368~375 (2011)
  14. Zanjani, M. O., "Translation and adaptation of the auditory behavior in everyday Life(ABEL)questionnaire into persian : A pilot study", Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences and Research, 2(3), pp.63~67 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)