The Evolution of Welfare Production Regimes in East Asia: A Comparative Study of Korea, Japan, and Taiwan
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the evolution of a dualistic welfare production regime in Korea and Japan, with Taiwan as a contrasting case. It examines how institutions evolved during the industrialization period in the three countries. Taking the view of historical institutionalism, the Varieties of Capitalism approach (Hall & Soskice, 2001) provided theoretical grounds for analyzing the variation of welfare production regimes in East Asia. The study argues that historical events (in Japan, the end of World War II and the Allied occupation; in Korea, the influx of foreign aid followed by the Korean War and the military government; in Taiwan, the defeat of the Kuomintang and ethnic divisions) created a critical juncture for these countries’ institutional developments. Korea and Japan developed large-company-oriented welfare production regimes, while Taiwan’s regime was more small and medium size enterprises (SMEs)-oriented. The dualistic welfare production regime of large companies and small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) in Korea and Japan is further explained by the functional equivalent welfare system that developed together with each country’s production regime.
Abstract
This study examines the evolution of a dualistic welfare production regime in Korea and Japan, with Taiwan as a contrasting case. It examines how institutions evolved during the industrialization period in the three countries. Taking the view of historical institutionalism, the Varieties of Capitalism approach (Hall & Soskice, 2001) provided theoretical grounds for analyzing the variation of welfare production regimes in East Asia. The study argues that historical events (in Japan, the end of World War II and the Allied occupation; in Korea, the influx of foreign aid followed by the Korean War and the military government; in Taiwan, the defeat of the Kuomintang and ethnic divisions) created a critical juncture for these countries’ institutional developments. Korea and Japan developed large-company-oriented welfare production regimes, while Taiwan’s regime was more small and medium size enterprises (SMEs)-oriented. The dualistic welfare production regime of large companies and small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) in Korea and Japan is further explained by the functional equivalent welfare system that developed together with each country’s production regime.
참고문헌 (51)
- Adams, D., "Education and social change in Korea" (1993), Garland
- Ashton, D., "Education and training for development in East Asia: The political economy of skill formation in East Asian newly industrialised economies" (1999), Routledge
- Aspalter, C., "Conservative welfare state system in East Asia" (2001), Praeger
- Aspalter, C., "The East Asian welfare model", International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(4), pp.290~301 (2006)
- Brinton, M. C., "Married women’s employment in rapidly industrializing societies: Examples from East Asia", American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), pp.1099~ (1995)
- Chang, S.M., "Secondary education in Korea" (1995), KDI
- Chen, S., "Changing patterns of industrial relations in Taiwan", Industrial Relations, 42(3), pp.315~340 (2003)
- Chen, S., "Industrial Democracy, Economic Growth, and Income Distribution in Taiwan", American Asian Review, pp.49~77 (1995)
- Cho, J. H., "East Asian economy, from 20th century to 21st century" (2009), Sigmapress
- Chu, J.J., "Industrial Unions VS Employers: The Power Struggle in the Taiwanese Workplaces", Asian Profile, 22(2), pp.105~118 (1994)
- Croissant, A., "Changing welfare regimes in East and Southeast Asia: Crisis, change and challenge", Social Policy & Administration, 38(5), pp.504~524 (2004)
- Deyo, F. C., "The political economy of social policy formation: East Asia’s newly industrialized countries, in States and development in the Asian Pacific rim", pp.289~306 (1992), Sage
- Dore, R., "British factory—Japanese factory: The origins of national diversity in industrial relations" (1974), Allen & Unwin
- Esping-Andersen, G., "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" (1990), Polity Press
- Estévez-Abe, M., "Gendering the varieties of capitalism: A study of occupational segregation by sex in advanced industrial societies", World Politics, 59(1), pp.142~175 (2006)
- Margarita Estevez-Abe, "Welfare and capitalism in postwar Japan" (2008), Cambridge University Press,
- Estévez-Abe, M., "Social protection and the formation of skills: A reinterpretation of the welfare state, in Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage", pp.145~183 (2001), Oxford University Press
- Farh, J., "Human resource management in Taiwan, Republic of China, in Human resource management on the Pacific Rim: Institutions, practices and attitudes", pp.265~294 (1995), de Gruyter
- Fields, K., "Enterprise and the State in Korea and Taiwan" (1995), Cornell University Press
- Frenkel, J. H., "The resurgence and fragility of trade unions in Taiwan, in Organized labor in the Asia-Pacific region", pp.162~186 (1993), ILR Press
- Gerlach, M. L., "Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business" (1992), University of California Press
- Goodman, R., "The East Asian welfare states: Peripatetic learning, adaptive change, and nation-building, in Welfare state in transition: National adaptation in global economies", pp.192~224 (1996), Sage Publications
- Gordon, A., "The evolution of labor relations in Japan" (1985), Harvard University Press
- Green, F., "The role of the state in skill formation: evidence from the Republic of Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan", Oxford Review on Economic Policy, 15(1), pp.82~96 (1999)
- Hall, P.A., "Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Hall, P.A., "Political science and the three new institutionalisms" (1996), Blackwell
- Immergut, E. M., "The theoretical core of the new institutionalism", Politics and Society, 26(1), pp.5~34 (1998)
- Jang, B. I., "Introduction to Japanese economy" (2008), Ulsan University Press
- Johnson, C. A., "MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975" (1975), Stanford University Press
- Jones, C., "New Perspectives on the welfare states in Europe" (1993), Routledge
- Kasza, G., "One world of welfare: Japan in comparative perspective" (2006), Cornell University Press
- Keizer, A., "Changes in Japanese employment practices" (2010), Routledge
- Ku, Y., "Developments in East Asian Welfare studies", Social Policy & Administration, 41(2), pp.115~131 (2007)
- Kwon, H.J., "Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia", Development and Change, 36(3), pp.477~497 (2005)
- Kwon, S., "The Korean welfare state: A paradox of expansion in an era of globalisation and economic crisis", International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(3), pp.242~248 (2007)
- Kwon, S. M., "East Asian production regime and welfare system: A comparative study on Korea, Japan and Taiwan", Paper presented at the Spring 2004 Korean Social Welfare Conference (2003)
- 권순미, "산업화시기 동아시아국가의 기업지배구조와 복지제도 : 일본, 한국, 대만의 비교", 아세아연구, 48(2), pp.253~290 (2005), 아세아문제연구소
- 권순미, "금융체제, 기업지배구조, 그리고 고용체제:한국과 일본의 비교", 한국정치학회보, 40(5), pp.251~277 (2006), 한국정치학회
- Lee, Y., "East Asian welfare regimes: Testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state", Social Policy & Administration, 41(2), pp.197~212 (2007)
- Levine, S., "Human resources in Japanese industrial development" (1980), Princeton University Press
- Odagiri, H., "Growth through Competition, Competition through Growth" (1994), Clarendon Press
- Osterman, P., "Internal Labour Markets" (1985), MIT
- Peng, I., "Labour market dualization in Japan and South Korea", Paper presented in the Labour Market Dualization Workshop (2010)
- Schmitter, P., "Trends toward corporatist intermediation" (1979), Sage Publication
- Seeleib-Kaiser, M., "Globalisation, Political Discourse, and Welfare Systems in a Comparative Perspective: Germany, Japan, and the USA", Czech Sociological Review, 38(6), pp.749~769 (2002)
- Song, H. K., "comparative analysis of labour market structure: Korea and Taiwan", Korean Sociology, 34(winter), pp.951~979 (2000)
- Thelen, K., "How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan" (2004), Cambridge University Press
- Thelen, K., "Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, in Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative politics" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Weiss, L., "War, the state, and the origins of the Japanese employment system", Politics and Society, 21(3), pp.325~354 (1993)
- Wilkinson, B., "Labour and industry in the Asia-Pacific: Lessons from the newlyindustrialized countries" (1994), de Gruyter
- 양재진, "한국의 산업화시기 숙련형성과 복지제도의 기원: 생산레짐 시각에서 본 1962-1986년의 재해석", 한국정치학회보, 38(5), pp.85~103 (2004), 한국정치학회
