A Study of Performance Information Use and Credibility in Performance Management Systems:Focusing on the Self-Evaluation System

키워드

참고문헌 (45)

1. Alkin, M. C., "A guide for evaluation decision-makers" (1985), Sage
2. Alkin, M. C., "Unbundling evaluation use", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
3. Askim, J., "Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: Experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), pp.297~320 (2008)
4. De Kool, D., "The utilization of performance information: The Dutch network ecological monitoring", Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(1), pp.1~13 (2012)
5. Dull, M., "Results-model reform leadership: Questions of credible commitment", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), pp.255~284 (2008)
6. Forss, K., "Process use of evaluations: Types of use that precede lessons learned and feedback", Evaluation, 8(1), pp.29~45 (2002)
7. Frisco, V., "Congressional use of the Program Assessment Rating Tool", Public Budgeting and Finance, 28(2), pp.1~19 (2008)
8. Government performance: Lessons learned for the next administration on using performance information to improve results, "Government Accountability Office", Government Printing Office, ~ (2008)
9. Government performance: Strategies for building a results-oriented and collaborative culture in the federal government, "Government Accountability Office", Government Printing Office, ~ (2009)
10. Managing for results: Agencies’ trends in the use of performance information to make decisions, "Government Accountability Office", Government Printing Office, ~ (2014)
11. Gilmour, J. B., "Implementing OMB’s Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART):Meeting the challenges of integrating budget and performance", OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1), pp.1~40 (2007)
12. Gilmour, J. B., "Assessing performance budgeting at OMB : The influence of politics, performance and program size", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), pp.169~186 (2006)
13. "Program Assessment Rating Tool" (2005)[URL]
14. Guillén, M. F., "The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain" (2001), Princeton University Press
15. Hatry, H. P., "Performance information in the public sector: How it is used" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
16. Huberman, M., "Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study", American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), pp.363~391 (1990)
17. Hughes, A., "Testimony to the senate homeland security and government affairs subcommittee on federal financial management, government information, and international security", OMB Watch, ~ (2006)
18. Hwang, H. -S., "Recommendations for improving the Korean public service evaluation system from a comparative perspective" (2013), Korean Institute of Public Administration
19. James, O., "The UK core executive’s use of public service agreements as a tool of governance", Public Administration, 82(2), pp.397~419 (2004)
20. Johansson, T., "Explaining the utilization of relative performance evaluation in local government : A multi-theoretical study using data from Sweden", Financial Accountability and Management, 25(2), pp.197~224 (2009)
21. Johnson, C., "Performance information in the public sector: How it is used", pp.140~156 (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
22. 주영효, "The power of institutional isomorphism: an analysis of the institutionalization of performance-based pay systems in Korean National Universities", Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(2), pp.281~297 (2012), 교육연구소[DOI]
23. Julnes, P. de L., "Performance information in the public sector:How it is used", pp.58~71 (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
24. Julnes, P. de L., "Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations : An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation", Public Administration Review, 61(6), pp.693~708 (2001)
25. Kamensky, J. M., "The Obama performance approach : A mid-term snapshot", Public Performance and Management Review, 35(1), pp.132~147 (2011)
26. Kirkhart, K. E., "Reconceptualizing evaluation use : An integrated theory of influence", New Directions for Evaluation, 88, pp.5~23 (2000)
27. 공동성, "재정사업 평가결과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 2006년도 평가결과를 중심으로", 정책분석평가학회보, 17(4), pp.27~56 (2007), 한국정책분석평가학회
28. Laegreid, P., "Performance information in the public sector: How it is used", pp.125~141 (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
29. Lee, H. -S., "Improving the development and operation of performance management plans" (2013), Korean Institute of Public Administration
30. Melkers, J., "Models of performance-measurement use in local governments : Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects", Public Administration Review, 65(2), pp.180~190 (2005)
31. Moynihan, D. P., "The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform" (2008), Georgetown University Press
32. Moynihan, D. P., "Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART", Public Administration Review, 72(4), pp.592~602 (2012)
33. Moynihan, D. P., "The big question for performance management:Why do managers use performance information?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), pp.849~866 (2010)
34. Moynihan, D. P., "Setting the table : How transformational leadership fosters performance information use", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), pp.143~164 (2011)
35. Newcomer, K, "How does program performance assessment affect program management in the federal government?", Public Performance and Management Review, 30(3), pp.332~350 (2007)
36. Performance management and evaluation in public service, "Office for Government Policy Coordination", ~ (2008)
37. The president’s budget for fiscal year 2012: Analytical perspectives, "Office of Management and Budget", Government Printing Office, ~ (2011)
38. Park, J. -H., "A study of the content of performance information and the relevance of performance measures" (2009), Korean Institute of Public Administration
39. 박민정, "ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT RATING TOOL ON PROGRAM BUDGET REDUCTION", International Review of Public Administration, 14(3), pp.25~35 (2010), 한국행정학회
40. Park, N. -W., "Performance management in the Korean public sector" (2006), Center for Performance Evaluation and Management
41. Radin, B. A., "Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic value" (2006), Georgetown University Press
42. Rossi, P. H., "Evaluation: A systematic approach" (1985), Sage
43. Stalebrink, O., "PART in retrospect: An examination of legislators’attitudes toward PART", Public Budgeting and Finance, 31(2), pp.1~21 (2011)
44. Taylor, J., "Strengthening the link between performance measurement and decision making", Public Administration, 87(4), pp.853~871 (2009)
45. Van Dooren, W., "Performance management in the public sector" (2010), Routledge

관련 논문AI추천