본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Back to Bureaucracy? The Advent of the Neo-Weberian State in Germany

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

In this contribution, the emergence of the Neo-Weberian State (NWS) is analyzed with regard to the German public administration. Drawing on the concept of a “governance space” which consists of hierarchy, markets and networks, we make a distinction between four empirical manifestations of the of NWS, namely NWS as (1) Come back of the public/re-municipalization; (2) re-hierarchization; (3) de-agencification; (4) de-escalation in performance management. These movements can on the one hand be interpreted as (partial) reversal of NPM approaches and a ‘swinging back of the pendulum’ (see XX & YY, 2019) towards the public and classical Weberian principles (e.g. hierarchy, regulation, institutional re-aggregation). This resulted in a re-strengthening of hierarchy within the overall “governance space” to the detriment of market mechanisms and networks without completely replacing the last two mentioned. As the NPM has not delivered what it promised and does not appear as an appropriate response to more recent challenges connected to crises and wicked problems, a partial “return of the public” and a move away from the economisation logic of NPM have been observed. On the other hand, and connected to this, Post-NPM reversals and managerial “de-escalation” gave way to hybrid models merging NPM and classic Weberian administration. While there are some well-functioning mixtures of NPM and Weberianism, the hybridization of “old” and “neo” elements has also provoked ambivalent and rather negative assessments regarding the actual functioning of NWS in Germany. For reform practices and future administrative modernization, it can be deduced from our analysis that the NWS is only partially suitable as a model for reforms, largely depending on the context of reform and implementation practices.

Abstract

In this contribution, the emergence of the Neo-Weberian State (NWS) is analyzed with regard to the German public administration. Drawing on the concept of a “governance space” which consists of hierarchy, markets and networks, we make a distinction between four empirical manifestations of the of NWS, namely NWS as (1) Come back of the public/re-municipalization; (2) re-hierarchization; (3) de-agencification; (4) de-escalation in performance management. These movements can on the one hand be interpreted as (partial) reversal of NPM approaches and a ‘swinging back of the pendulum’ (see XX & YY, 2019) towards the public and classical Weberian principles (e.g. hierarchy, regulation, institutional re-aggregation). This resulted in a re-strengthening of hierarchy within the overall “governance space” to the detriment of market mechanisms and networks without completely replacing the last two mentioned. As the NPM has not delivered what it promised and does not appear as an appropriate response to more recent challenges connected to crises and wicked problems, a partial “return of the public” and a move away from the economisation logic of NPM have been observed. On the other hand, and connected to this, Post-NPM reversals and managerial “de-escalation” gave way to hybrid models merging NPM and classic Weberian administration. While there are some well-functioning mixtures of NPM and Weberianism, the hybridization of “old” and “neo” elements has also provoked ambivalent and rather negative assessments regarding the actual functioning of NWS in Germany. For reform practices and future administrative modernization, it can be deduced from our analysis that the NWS is only partially suitable as a model for reforms, largely depending on the context of reform and implementation practices.

참고문헌 (74)

  1. Bach, T., "Governance of public sector organizations: Proliferation, autonomy and performance", pp.89~110 (2010), Palgrave Macmillan UK
  2. Bach, T., "Animals in the administrative zoo : organizational change and agency autonomy in Germany", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), pp.443~468 (2010)[DOI]
  3. Bach, T., "The Differential Empowering Effects of Europeanization on the Autonomy of National Agencies", Governance, 28(3), pp.285~304 (2015)[DOI]
  4. Bandemer, S. v., "Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform", pp.667~675 (2019), Springer VS
  5. Bogumil, J., "Verwaltung und Verwaltungswissenschaften in Deutschland" (2020), Springer
  6. Bönker, F., "Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision", pp.71~85 (2016), Palgrave Macmillan
  7. Bouckaert, G., "From NPM to NWS in Europe", Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, (Special Issue) (2022)[DOI]
  8. Bouckaert, G., "The Neo-Weberian state: From ideal type model to reality?", Max Weber Studies, 23(1), pp.13~59 (2023)[DOI]
  9. Bouckaert, G., "European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis", Public Administration Review, 80(5), pp.765~773 (2020)[DOI]
  10. Bouckaert, G., "Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons", pp.1~20 (2016), Palgrave Macmillan
  11. Byrkjeflot, H., "The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe", pp.991~1009 (2018), Palgrave Macmillan
  12. Cingolani, L., "The role of agencification in achieving value-for-money in public spending", Governance, 33(3), pp.545~563 (2020)[DOI]
  13. Deckwirth, C., "Liberalisierung und Privatisierung in Europa: Die Reorganisation der öffentlichen Infrastruktur in der Europäischen Union", pp.64~95 (2008), Westfälisches
  14. Demmke, C., "Leistungsbezahlung in den öffentlichen Diensten der EU-Mitgliedstaaten", Der moderne Staat (dms), 2(1), pp.53~71 (2009)[DOI]
  15. Ebinger, F., "Territorial reforms in Germany and Europe : effects on administrative performance and democratic participation", Local Government Studies, 45(2), pp.1~23 (2018)[DOI]
  16. Fleischer, J., "Public Administration in Germany", pp.61~80 (2021), Palgrave Macmillan
  17. Florio, M, "The Great Divestiture – Evaluating the Welfare Impact of the British Privatization 1979–1997" (2004), MIT Press
  18. Friedländer, B., "Public Administration in Germany", pp.291~310 (2021), Palgrave Macmillan
  19. "Federalism and decentralization in Germany. Basic features and principles for German development cooperation" (2018)[URL]
  20. Gabriel, R., "Social Media", pp.27~52 (2017), Springer Gabler
  21. Grossi, G., "Municipal corporatization in Germany and Italy", Public Management Review, 10(5), pp.597~618 (2008)[DOI]
  22. Grossi, G., "Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision", pp.297~312 (2016), Palgrave Macmillan
  23. Hammerschmid, G., "Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top", pp.63~72 (2016), Edward Elgar Publishing
  24. Hassenteufel, P., "Public Healthcare Systems Between Restructuring and Retrenchment", pp.126~146 (2014), Palgrave Macmillan
  25. Hellström, M., "The Resilience of New Public Management" (2024), Oxford University Press
  26. (2011)[URL]
  27. Jacobsen, C., "Performance management in the public sector: does it decrease or increase innovation and performance?", International Journal of Public Administration, 37(14), pp.1011~1023 (2014)[DOI]
  28. Jethon, A., "Usability and actual use of performance information in German municipal budgets : the perspective of local politicians", Public Money & Management, 42(3), pp.152~159 (2021)[DOI]
  29. "Industrielle Beziehungen", 2011, 99~118, 10.1688[DOI]
  30. Die Mannheimer Corona-Studie: Schwerpunktbericht zu Erwerbstätigkeit und Kinderbetreuung, "Juhl, S.", University of Mannheim, ~ (2020)
  31. Klenk, T., "The governance of hospital markets – Comparing two Bismarckian countries", Journal for European Policy Analysis, 1(1), pp.108~126 (2015)[DOI]
  32. Kuhlmann, S., (2009), Nomos
  33. Kuhlmann, S., "Good Public Governance in a Global Pandemic", pp.291~304 (2020)
  34. Kuhlmann, S., "A Research Agenda for Regional and Local Government", pp.111~131 (2021), Edward Elgar
  35. Kuhlmann, S., "Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform", pp.139~151 (2019), Springer VS
  36. Kuhlmann, S., "Prefects, Governors and Commissioners. Territorial Representatives of the State in Europe", pp.327~352 (2021), Palgrave Macmillan
  37. Kuhlmann, S., "Evaluating administrative modernization in German local governments: success or failure of the “new steering model?", Public Administration Review, 68(5), pp.851~863 (2008)[DOI]
  38. Kuhlmann, S., "Opportunity management of the COVID-19 pandemic : testing the crisis from a global perspective", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), pp.497~517 (2021)[DOI]
  39. Kuhlmann, S., "Multi-level responses to COVID-19 : crisis coordination in Germany from an inter-governmental perspective", Local Government Studies, 48(2), pp.312~334 (2022)[DOI]
  40. Kuhlmann, S., "Institutional designs and dynamics of crisis governance at the local level : European governments facing the polycrisis", Policy Design and Practice (2024)[DOI]
  41. Kuhlmann, S., "Tracing divergence in crisis governance : responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Germany and Sweden compared", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(3), pp.556~575 (2021)[DOI]
  42. Kuhlmann, S., "Handbook on Local and Regional Governance", pp.315~322 (2023), Edward Elgar
  43. Kuhlmann, S., "Public Administration in Germany: Institutions, Reforms, Governance" (2021), Palgrave Macmillan
  44. Kuhlmann, S., "Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe" (2019), Edward Elgar
  45. Laffin, M., "New Perspectives on Intergovernmental Relations: Crisis and Response" (2024), Palgrave Macmillan
  46. Lapuente, V., "Goats or wolves? Private sector managers in the public sector", Governance, 33(3), pp.599~619 (2020)[DOI]
  47. Larsson, B., "The Legitimacy of Performance-Related Pay in Swedish Public Sector Organisation", Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 26(1), pp.45~65 (2022)[DOI]
  48. Mayer, F., (2006), VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
  49. From state to market revisited: more empirical evidence on the efficiency of public (and privately-owned) enterprises, "Mühlenkamp, H.", ~, pp.MPRA Paper No. 47570 (2013)
  50. Consolidate, streamline, digitalise. Reducing bureaucracy. Equipping Germany for the future, "NKR – Nationaler Normenkontrollrat", NKR, ~ (2023)
  51. Oehlert, F., "New Perspectives on Intergovernmental Relations: Crisis and Response" (2024), Palgrave Macmillan
  52. Opphard, K., , pp.75~ (2010), VKS-Information
  53. Pollitt, C., "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis into the Age of Austerity" (2017), Oxford University Press
  54. Proeller, I., "Public Administration in Germany", pp.393~410 (2021), Palgrave Macmillan
  55. Proeller, I., "Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons", pp.139~152 (2016), Palgrave Macmillan
  56. "Verwaltung & Management", 2009, 227~240, 10.1007[DOI]
  57. Schmidt, W., "Performance-related pay in German public services : the example of local authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia", Employee Relations, 33(2), pp.140~158 (2011)[DOI]
  58. Schuster, F., (2003), Verlag für Wirtschaftskommunikation
  59. Sommermann, K. -P., "Public Administration in Germany", pp.17~34 (2021), Palgrave Macmillan
  60. (2017)[URL]
  61. "Guidelines on the Identification and Presentation of Compliance Costs in Legislative Proposals by the Federal Government" (2018)[URL]
  62. Stellermann, R., (2009), Bearing Point
  63. Sześciło, D., "Agencification revisited : trends in consolidation of central government administration in Europe", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), pp.995~1012 (2022)[DOI]
  64. Van Thiel, S., "The politics of quangocracy", The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21(3), pp.522~529 (2019)[DOI]
  65. "Stadtwerk der Zukunft IV: Konzessionsverträge – Handlungsoptionen für Kommunen und Stadtwerke" (2009)[URL]
  66. (2009)[URL]
  67. Weiß, J., "Haushaltsführung und Verwaltungssteuerung in den Kommunen", Double the reform, half the success? The implementation of accrual accounting and managerial instruments through the DOPPIK reforms in German local governments, 2020, pp.13(1), 17~18
  68. Wenzel, A. -K., "Making Performance Pay Work : The Impact of Transparency, Participation, and Fairness on Controlling Perception and Intrinsic Motivation", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), pp.232~255 (2019)[DOI]
  69. Wollmann, H, "Kommunalverwaltung im Modernisierungsschub", pp.1~50 (1996), Leske + Budrich
  70. Wollmann, H., "Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision", pp.313~334 (2016), Palgrave Macmillan
  71. Wollmann, H., "The Provision of Public Services in Europe: Between State, Local Government and Market", pp.168~190 (2010), Edward Elgar Publishing

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)