논증 평가 기법 개발
Developing the way of evaluating arguments
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The most important thing in teaching arguments is to analyse and evaluate arguments. We need reasonable, reliable, and efficient criterion to evaluate arguments. After examining the criterions of Korean textbooks, this paper develops the criterion which satisfies the conditions of argument evaluation, and apply it to newspaper editorials. The way of evaluating arguments which this paper develops is unique in that how many premises there are and what structure they have in arguments are considered. The process and product are displayed effectively in evaluation table.
Abstract
The most important thing in teaching arguments is to analyse and evaluate arguments. We need reasonable, reliable, and efficient criterion to evaluate arguments. After examining the criterions of Korean textbooks, this paper develops the criterion which satisfies the conditions of argument evaluation, and apply it to newspaper editorials. The way of evaluating arguments which this paper develops is unique in that how many premises there are and what structure they have in arguments are considered. The process and product are displayed effectively in evaluation table.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김광수, "논리와 비판적 사고" (1995), 철학과현실사
- 김영정, "사고와 논술 기초편(하)" (2006), EBS
- 민병곤, "신문사설의 논증 구조분석-논증 이론의 교육적 적용을 위하여-", 제43회 국어국문학 학술대회집 (2000)
- 바커,스티븐, "논리학의 기초" (1986), 서광사
- 박준호, "논리와 논증의 이해" (2003), 한국문화사
- 박준호, "비형식 논리학의 논증과 논증 평가 개념", 범한철학, 34, pp.151~175 (2004)
- 새먼, 웨즈리 C, "논리학" (1988), 박영사
- 정대현, "논리교실 필로지아" (2002), (주)오란디프
- 어빙 코피, "논리학입문 (제10판)" (2000), 경문사
- 이광모, "논증과 글쓰기" (2006), 형설출판사
- 최훈, "논리는 나의 힘" (2003)
- 최훈, "오류 연구의 최근 동향", 수사학, 5 (2006), 한국수사학회
- 최훈, "창의적인 논술,‘깊이’에서 만들어진다", OK논구술.net, pp.46~50 (2006)
- 탁석산, "오류를 알면 논리가 보인다" (2001), 책세상
- 하병학, "토론과 설득을 위한 우리들의 논리", 철학과현실사
- Biro, J, "Normativity, Argumentation and an Epistemic Theory of Fallacies, Argumentation Illuminated", pp.85~103 (1992), Sic Sat
- Blair, "Premise Relevance, Norms in Argumentation", pp.67~83 (1989), Foris
- Damer, T. Edward, "Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments, Fourth Edition" (2001), Wadsworth
- Freeman, James B, "Thinking Logically: Basic Concepts for Reasoning, Second Edition" (1993), Prentice-Hall Inc
- Goiver,Trudy, "What is a Good Argument?", Metaphilosophy, 22, pp.393~409 (1992)
- Govier,Trudy, "A Practical Study of Argument, fifth edition" (2001), Wadsworth
- Groarke,L, "In defense of deductivism: Replying to Govier, Argumentation Illuminated", pp.113~121 (1992), Sic Sat
- Hitchcock,David, "Validity in Conductive Arguments, New Essays in Informal Logic", pp.58~66 (1994), Vale Press
- Johnson,Ralph A, "Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Kohane,Howard, "Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reasoning in Everyday Life" (1971), Wadsworth
- McPeck,John E, "Critical Thinking and Education" (1981), Martin Press
- Quine, W. V. O, "Two Dogmas of Empiricism", The Philosophical Review, 60, pp.20~43 (1951)