believe/consider/croire-부정사 구조의 논항 체계에 대한 비교연구
A Comparative Study of Argument Status in Infinitival Constructions of believe/consider/croire
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to observe the distributional characteristics of arguments, and to analyze their movement operations by comparing the infinitival constructions between English verbs “believe/consider” and French verb “croire”. We can describe their distributional characteristics as follows: We can conclude from these results that English verb “consider” is more similar to the French counterpart “croire” than “believe” from the structural point of view. In particular, the grammaticality of a sentence depends not only on the existence or not of TP in infinitival constructions, but also on the lexical realization or not of the embedded subject in small clauses. Finally, we verify that the HNPS plays an important role in small clauses of French “croire”, but there is no evidence of this phonological operation in English “consider”-clause.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to observe the distributional characteristics of arguments, and to analyze their movement operations by comparing the infinitival constructions between English verbs “believe/consider” and French verb “croire”. We can describe their distributional characteristics as follows: We can conclude from these results that English verb “consider” is more similar to the French counterpart “croire” than “believe” from the structural point of view. In particular, the grammaticality of a sentence depends not only on the existence or not of TP in infinitival constructions, but also on the lexical realization or not of the embedded subject in small clauses. Finally, we verify that the HNPS plays an important role in small clauses of French “croire”, but there is no evidence of this phonological operation in English “consider”-clause.
참고문헌 (18)
- Alhorais, N., "The Categorial Status of the Small Clause Node: A Minimalist Approach" (2006), University of Newcastle
- Boskovic, Z., "The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach" (1997), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Boskovic, Z., "Agree, Phase, and Intervention Effects" (2005), University of Connecticut
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Dordrecht Foris
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by Phase", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT
- Chomsky, N., "On Phases" (2005), MIT
- Chomsky, N., "The Theory of Principles and Parameters", pp.13~127 (1995), Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
- Haegeman, L, "English Grammar: A Generative Perspective" (1999), MA: Blackwell
- Huot,H, "Constructions infinitives du fran?is,Gen?e:Droz", ~ (1981)
- Kayne,R-S, "Connectedness and Binary Branching.Dordrecht:Foris", ~ (1984)
- Martin, R., "A minimalist theory of PRO and control", Ph.D., pp.1996
- McCawley, J-D., "The Syntactic Phenomena of English" (1988), The University of Chicago Press
- Rouveret,A, "Pr?entation et commentaire.La nouvelle syntaxe,Paris:Editions du Seuil", ~ (1987)
- Runner, J-T., "The Accusative Plus Infinitive Construction in English", pp.1~15 (2006), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax
- Ruwet,N, "Grammaire des insultes et autres ?udes.Paris:Editions du Seuil", ~ (1982)
- Safir, K. -J., "Syntactic Chains" (1985), Cambridge : Univ. Press
- Stowell, T, "Origins of Phrase Structure", Ph.D., pp.1981