본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Critical Review of Current Crisis Simulation Methodology

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

This paper is concerned with simulation exercises used to train key response agencies for crisis situations. While ‘multi-agency’ simulations are increasingly acknowledged as a necessary and significant training tool for emergency response organisations, many current crisis simulations are still focused on the revision of existing response plans only. However, a crisis requires a rapid reaction, yet in contrast to an ‘emergency’, the risks for critical decision makers in crisis situations are difficult to measure, owing to their ill-structure. In other words, a crisis situation is likely to create great uncertainty, unfamiliarity and complexity, and consequently should be managed by adaptive or second order expertise and techniques, rather than routine or structured responses. In this context, the paper attempts to prove that the current practices of simulation exercises might not be good enough for uncertain, unfamiliar, and complex ‘crisis’ situations, in particular, by conducting case studies of two different underground fire crises in Korea (Daegu Subway Fire 2003) and the UK (King’s Cross Fire 1987). Finally, it is suggested that the three abilities: ‘flexibility’, ‘improvisation’ and ‘creativity’ are critical in responding to a crisis situation.

Abstract

This paper is concerned with simulation exercises used to train key response agencies for crisis situations. While ‘multi-agency’ simulations are increasingly acknowledged as a necessary and significant training tool for emergency response organisations, many current crisis simulations are still focused on the revision of existing response plans only. However, a crisis requires a rapid reaction, yet in contrast to an ‘emergency’, the risks for critical decision makers in crisis situations are difficult to measure, owing to their ill-structure. In other words, a crisis situation is likely to create great uncertainty, unfamiliarity and complexity, and consequently should be managed by adaptive or second order expertise and techniques, rather than routine or structured responses. In this context, the paper attempts to prove that the current practices of simulation exercises might not be good enough for uncertain, unfamiliar, and complex ‘crisis’ situations, in particular, by conducting case studies of two different underground fire crises in Korea (Daegu Subway Fire 2003) and the UK (King’s Cross Fire 1987). Finally, it is suggested that the three abilities: ‘flexibility’, ‘improvisation’ and ‘creativity’ are critical in responding to a crisis situation.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. "Banfield, Krisis or Crisis? Workplace Ministry in Hertfordshire & Bedfordshire"[URL]
  2. U. Beck, "Risk Society" (1992), Sage
  3. A. Boin, "The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership under Pressure" (2005), Cambridge University Press
  4. E. P. Borodzicz, "Risky business: Crisis simulations examined in the context of the safety people", 박사, pp.1997
  5. E. P. Borodzicz, "Individual and Group Learning in Crisis Simulations", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(3), pp.139~147 (2002)
  6. E. P. Borodzicz, "The Missing Ingredient is the Value of Flexibility", Simulation and Gaming, 35(3), pp.414~426 (2004)
  7. E. P. Borodzicz, "Risk, crisis & security management" (2005), John Wiley & Sons
  8. "Cabinet Office, Emergency Preparedness", HM Government, ~ (2005)
  9. J. Chung, "Comparative Study of Underground Fires: the Cases of the Daegu Subway Fire and the King´s Cross Underground Fire", Proc. the 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (2005)
  10. R. T. Clemen, "Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools" (2001), Duxbury Thomson Learning
  11. M. T. Crichton, "Training Decision Makers-Tactical Decision Games", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8(4), pp.208~217 (2000)
  12. B.Crossland, ""The King"s Cross Underground Fire and the Setting Up of the Investigation", Fire Safety Journal,vol.18,no.1, pp.3~11 (1992)
  13. J. R. Daring, "Crisis Management in International Business: Keys to Effective Decision Making", Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 15(8), pp.3~8 (1994)
  14. W. R. Dombrowsky, "Again and Again: Is a Disaster What We Call Disaster? Some Conceptual Notes on Conceptualizing the Object of Disaster Sociology", International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 13(3), pp.241~254 (1995)
  15. D. Fennell, "Investigation into the King’'s Cross underground fire" (1998), HMSO
  16. R. Flin, "Sitting in the Hot Seat: Leasers and team for Critical Incident Management" (1996), Jones Willey & Sons
  17. C. Hansen, "Changing Definitions of Crisis, in Natural Risk and Civil Protection" (1994), E&FN Spon
  18. Home Office, "Dealing with Disasters (Revised Third Edition)" (2003), Home Office
  19. Investigation Report on the 2.18 Daegu Subway Accident, "W. H. Hong", Kyungpook University, ~ (2004)
  20. T. Horlick-Jones, "Planning and coordinating urban emergency management", Disaster Management, 6(3), pp.141~146
  21. J. M. Jacques, "Cognition towards crisis: the blind man held a handful of snow……and concluded that white was cold", International Journal of Emergency Management, 3(1), pp.21~39 (2006)
  22. Creativity in Emergency Response to the World Trade Centre Disaster, in Beyond September 11th: An account of Post-Disaster Research, "J. M. Kendra", Natural Hazards Research and Information Centre, University of Colorado, ~ (2003)
  23. J. M. Kendra, "Elements of Resilience after the World Trade Centre Disaster: Reconstructing New York City’'s Emergency Operation Center", Disasters, 27(1), pp.37~53 (2003)
  24. B. S. Kim, "A Study on the Building-up of the Crisis Management System for the Effective Disaster management: Focus on the analysis of Dae-gu Subway fire accident", 석사, pp.2005
  25. W. C. Kriz, "Creating effective learning environments and learning organisations through gaming simulation design", Simulation and Gaming, 34(4), pp.495~511 (2003)
  26. C. Lalonde, "n search of Archetypes in Crisis Management", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(2), pp.76~88 (2004)
  27. C. S. Lee, "A Study on the Activities of Emergency Response Organisation: Focusing on the Case of Fire in Daegu Subway", 박사, pp.2007
  28. A. McConell, "Mission Impossible? Planning and Preparing for Crisis", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14(2), pp.59~69 (2006)
  29. K. Moodie, "The Technical Investigation of the Fire at London’'s Kings’' Cross Underground Station", Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 3(2), pp.49~63 (1991)
  30. E. Morin, "Pour une crisiologie", Communications, 25, pp.149~163 (1976)
  31. "Disaster reports: Fire in Daegu Subway" (2004)[URL]
  32. C. Perrow, "Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies" (1999), Princeton University Press
  33. N. Pidgeon, "Safety culture: key theoretical issues", Work and Stress, 12(3), pp.202~216 (1998)
  34. M. Punch, "Policing Disasters: the British experience", International Journal of Police Science and Management, 3(1), pp.40~54 (2000)
  35. E. Quarantelli, "Disasters are different, therefore planning for and managing them requires innovative as well as traditional behaviours", Proc. the Third Emergency Planning and Disaster Management Conference (1995)
  36. U. Rosenthal, "Crisis management: second order techniques, In Natural Risk and Civil Protection" (1994), E&FN Spon
  37. U. Rosenthal, "he Changing World of Crisis and Crisis Management, In Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas and Opportunities" (2001), Springfield
  38. C. Roux-Dufort, "s Crisis Management (Only) a Management of Exceptions", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(2), pp.105~114 (2007)
  39. D. Smith, "For whom the bell tolls: Imagining accidents and the development of crisis simulation in organisations", Simulation and Gaming, 35(3), pp.347~362 (2004)
  40. P. ’'t Hart, "Between crisis and normalcy: The long shadow of post-crisis politics, In Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities" (2001), Springfield
  41. B. Toft, "Learning from Disasters: a management approach (1st edition)" (1994), Butterworth-Heinemann
  42. B. Toft, "Limits to the mathematical modelling of disasters, In Accident and Design: contemporary debates in risk management" (1996), UCL press
  43. B. Toft, "Learning from Disasters: a management approach (2nd edition)" (1999), Perpetuity Press
  44. TCRP Report 86, "Vloume 12: Making Transportation Tunnels Safe and Secure", TRB (Transportation Research Board), 2006
  45. B. A. Turner, "Man-Made Disasters" (1978), Wykeham Publications
  46. B. A. Turner, "Flexibility and Improvisation in Emergency Services", Disaster Management, 6(2), pp.84~90 (1994)
  47. D. Upton, "Official Crisis Simulations in the UK and Elsewhere, In The International Simulation and Gaming Research Yearbook: Effective Learning from Games and Simulations" (2007), SAGSET
  48. G. R. Webb, "Planning to improvise: the importance of creativity and flexibility in crisis response", International Journal of Emergency Management, 3(1), pp.66~72 (2006)
  49. 11 and further Research Issues, "The Role of Simulation Exercises in the Assessment of Robustness and Resilience of Private or Public organisations, In Resilience of Cities to Terrorist and other Threats: Learning from 9", pp.2008, J. L. Wybo

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)