해방기의 김기림 비평에 나타난 민족 기표의 양상

Abstract

This essay show signifiant nations not Nation in the Kim, Ki-rim's critics of Liberation period(1945-1950). The Nation is transcendental and absolute signifiant, but nations is experienced and relative signifiant. In Kim, Ki-rim's critics, nations means that he thinks experienced and relative aspects of nation, such as nation's identification, variety of literacy task and method of literature nationalistic, and alternative idea against movement of the Right. Benedict Anderson and Prasenjit Duara thinks that what is nation, who discusses nation, and how say nation. Signifiant nation is imagined communities. So nation is not transcendental or absolute signifiant. But the literacy movement of the Right and the Left trusts ours nation only is true, and others nation is not true unconsciously. In the Kim, Ki-rim's critics, I research a aspect of imagined communities's identity. The signifiant nations is experienced and open concept, not transcendental and not-open. All people in the Kim, Ki-rim's critics is open concept. This thought is important. Many scholars think Kim, Ki-rim of Liberation period is the front of the literacy movement of and the Left, and Kim, Ki-rim writes the critics of the Left. We have to re-think Kim, Ki-rim. His critics defer from the critics of the Left. Nation in the critics of literacy movement of the Left is transcendental or absolute signifiant. Nation means the proletariat except the intellectuals. This nation is Nation. But nation in Kim, Ki-rim's critics is all people including the proletariat and the intellectuals. Kim, Ki-rim's nation is nations. Nations are experienced and open signifiant. Also nations in literature nationalistic is not single and uniform concept in the Kim, Ki-rim's critics, is plural and soft concept. Kim, Ki-rim insists literacy task and method is accounted in expressive and formed thing. Kim, Ki-rim looks at nations in literature nationalistic, and thinks that nations is different from Nation which used in the literacy movement of the Left. The literacy movement of the Left discusses that task of literature nationalistic serves in socialism revolution movement and method of literature nationalistic supports in political revolution movement only. But Kim, Ki-rim's literacy task and method in literature nationalistic is plural and soft. Kim, Ki-rim thinks that himself makes an alternative idea against the literacy movement of the Right and the Left. The literacy movement of the Right and the Left suggests transcendental and absolute Nation, but Kim, Ki-rim's nations are alternative. The literacy movement of the Right searches human himself who is transcendental and absolute being. Literature nationalistic of the Right treats this human being. This literature nationalistic shows transcendental and esthetic ideal. However Kim, Ki-rim announce human in moving man in socal and political reality. Man in Kim, Ki-rim's literature nationalistic is a kind of nations. The ideal in man is real. Thus nations in Kim, Ki-rim's literature nationalistic of Liberation period is experienced and relative signifiant, not transcendental and absolute signifiant in the literacy movement of the Right and the Left. We re-think Kim, Ki-rim's literature nationalistic of Liberation period.