신채호의 역사전기소설에 나타난 탈식민성 연구
A Study on Postcoloniality in Shin Chae Ho's Historic and Biographic Novels
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The moment when the Korean national word ‘Min Jok’ started to be used in modern concept was earlier than 1905 or later. That time, the enlightenment period's neo-Confusian intellectuals were committed to forming national narratives and demonstrating willful spirits to make their country safe from other races' oppression by way of protesting against the oppression of Japanese imperialism. One of the most important things that they did for national narratives and subversive freedom of oppression, through their historical narratives of Korean heroes, is to awaken Korean people’s national consciousness benumbed or distorted by the imperialists' colonial strategies and to heal it. Shin also tried to maintain national spirit in spite of loss of national sovereignty. The focus of the national discourse in the early modern Korea was on the restoration of national culture in order to be free from ‘Sino centrism’, China’s policy to emphasize its political-cultural-racial superiorities neglecting its boundaries. However, the attempt in early modern Korea put its focus on freedom from the Chinese centrists’ culture, not from the Japanese colonists’. In this tendency, what the nationalist Shin also regarded China as a colonist and produced the subversive discourse of its centrism shows his postcolonial perspectives to heal oppressed Koreans. This study explores the contextual relation of Shin's thought and narrative centering around historic and biographic novels, such as <The Lives of Eul Ji Moon Duk>, <The Lives of Lee Soon Shin>, and <The Lives of a Chief Commander Choi>. These lives of Shin's early own writing, through the process of recreating heroic narratives, shows that the writer distinctively reflects the voice of subversive discourse on his writing.
Abstract
The moment when the Korean national word ‘Min Jok’ started to be used in modern concept was earlier than 1905 or later. That time, the enlightenment period's neo-Confusian intellectuals were committed to forming national narratives and demonstrating willful spirits to make their country safe from other races' oppression by way of protesting against the oppression of Japanese imperialism. One of the most important things that they did for national narratives and subversive freedom of oppression, through their historical narratives of Korean heroes, is to awaken Korean people’s national consciousness benumbed or distorted by the imperialists' colonial strategies and to heal it. Shin also tried to maintain national spirit in spite of loss of national sovereignty. The focus of the national discourse in the early modern Korea was on the restoration of national culture in order to be free from ‘Sino centrism’, China’s policy to emphasize its political-cultural-racial superiorities neglecting its boundaries. However, the attempt in early modern Korea put its focus on freedom from the Chinese centrists’ culture, not from the Japanese colonists’. In this tendency, what the nationalist Shin also regarded China as a colonist and produced the subversive discourse of its centrism shows his postcolonial perspectives to heal oppressed Koreans. This study explores the contextual relation of Shin's thought and narrative centering around historic and biographic novels, such as <The Lives of Eul Ji Moon Duk>, <The Lives of Lee Soon Shin>, and <The Lives of a Chief Commander Choi>. These lives of Shin's early own writing, through the process of recreating heroic narratives, shows that the writer distinctively reflects the voice of subversive discourse on his writing.
참고문헌 (16)
- 신채호, "改訂版丹齋申采浩全集" (1987), 형설출판사
- 신채호, "꿈하늘-신채호작품집" (1990), 동광출판사
- 신채호, "신채호문학유고선집" (1995), 한국문화사
- 신채호, "백세 노승의 미인담(외)" (2004), 범우사
- 박노자, "우승열패의 신화" (2005), 한겨레출판
- 베네딕트 앤더슨, "민족주의의 기원과 전파" (1996), 사회비평사
- 정여울, "제국 그 사이의 한국 1895~1919" (2007), 휴머니스트 출판그룹
- 김현주, "신채호의 ‘역사’ 이념과 서사적 재현 양식의 연관성에 대한 연구", 상허학보, 14, pp.298~325 (2005), 상허학회
- 송명진, "고대사의 재정립 과정과 개화기 傳의 서술 양상 연구", 현대문학의 연구, 1(30), pp.99~130 (2006), 한국문학연구학회
- 송은영, "근대 소설의 역사성과 허구성-역사와 문학의 동일성과 타자성-", 상허학보, 10, pp.4~116 (2003), 상허학회
- 신용하, "한말 애국계몽운동의 사회사", pp.374~ (2004), 나남출판
- 이도연, "낭만적 정신의 현실적 구조 - 신채호의 <꿈하늘(夢天)>(1916)론", 민족문화연구, 37, pp.221~241 (2002), 민족문화연구원
- 이영신, "단재 신채호의 문학 연구", 박사, 고전문학, pp.2000
- 윤해동, "한국 민족주의의 근대성 비판", 역사문제연구, (4), pp.58~ (2000), 역사문제연구소
- 최현주, "신채호 문학의 탈식민성 고찰", 한국문학이론과 비평, 7(3), pp.324~345 (2003), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 한형구, "한국 근대 문학과 ‘민족’(民族)이라는 상상 공동체-민족주의적 정열, 혹은 한국 근대문학 형성의 주동력", 한국근대문학연구, 12(12), pp.202~236 (2005), 한국근대문학회
